130 likes | 276 Views
Thompson Online. Project Proposal Conceptual Design Phase March 8, 2010. Project Sponsor: Dr. Judy Skupa Assistant Superintendent Learning Services Project Lead: Kellie Bashor Technology Integration Coordinator. Problem Background.
E N D
Thompson Online Project Proposal Conceptual Design Phase March 8, 2010 Project Sponsor: Dr. Judy Skupa Assistant Superintendent Learning Services Project Lead: Kellie Bashor Technology Integration Coordinator
Problem Background • Prediction: Within 10 years, 50% of K-12 courses will be online • We are not prepared
Problem Background In Colorado • 13,903 students are enrolled in an online program – 87% living outside their home district • This is a gain of 12.5% in online students from 2008 to 2009 In Thompson • 357 students are home schooled and 1326 students attend in another district • All enrolled students don’t have online or hybrid access
Proposed Solution • Offer a robust online program through Thompson School District • Create a revenue stream rather than expense line • Meet compliance with CDE for PPOR and Accreditation Competition and Demand
Guiding Questions • How do we create a robust virtual learning environment? • How do we set ourselves apart as the most relevant, rigorous, engaging option? • How do we know it is effectively producing 21st Century learners/supporting 21st century learning? • How do we make this a partnership and not competition with our current schools?
Assumptions • Online learning options are necessary to remain a competitive school district • Thompson Online should be designed to meet multiple student group needs, not focusing on one sub-population, using differentiated instructional practices available through an online format
Potential Results • Increase retention and satisfaction of students and parents • Recapture funding loss and maintain a positive money flow • Close the achievement gap • Provide all students with online 21st century experiences
Context for the Solution Personalized Learning Precision Learning The student, with guidance from his/her personal learning network, determines his/her own learning journey meeting his/her needs, strengths, and interests; district, state and federal public rigorous education requirements; and a world class citizenship expectation.
Online School : Phase 1 • K to 12 • Core content from a provider • Quality staffing from a provider and from in-district teachers and staff support • Forward-looking technology systems • Key policies and processes
Timeline • April 2010 • Finalize scope for Phase 1 2010-2011 • Stakeholder information and input meetings cont. • May 2010 • Design school • August 2010 • Establish Thompson Online • October 2010 • Establish first Per Pupil Count
Project Team • Tech Advisory Membership • Leading participants • Monika Hardy • Alicia Cepaitis • Lanny Haas • Scott Elias • Rocky Madden • Lisa Leith • Diane Lauer
Appendix • Conceptual Phase deliverables • Understanding current environment • Research on best practices • Research documents • Required elements for an online program • Timeline and key dates • Budget details • Next phase documentation
Thompson Online Project Proposal Conceptual Design Phase Project Sponsor: Dr. Judy Skupa Assistant Superintendent Learning Services Project Lead: Kellie Bashor Technology Integration Coordinator