1 / 23

Lisa J. Delaney, M.S., NIOSH Roy T. McKay, Ph. D., University of Cincinnati

Determination of Known Exhalation Valve Damage Using a Negative Pressure User Seal Check Method on Full Face Respirators. Lisa J. Delaney, M.S., NIOSH Roy T. McKay, Ph. D., University of Cincinnati Andrew Freeman, M.D., University of Cincinnati. Respirator Leakage Pathways.

jamese
Download Presentation

Lisa J. Delaney, M.S., NIOSH Roy T. McKay, Ph. D., University of Cincinnati

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Determination of Known Exhalation Valve Damage Using a Negative Pressure User Seal Check Method on Full Face Respirators Lisa J. Delaney, M.S., NIOSH Roy T. McKay, Ph. D., University of Cincinnati Andrew Freeman, M.D., University of Cincinnati

  2. Respirator Leakage Pathways • Improper respirator-to-face seal • Inefficient air filtration device • Leak sites in the respirator body • Improperly functioning exhalation valves • Source:Brueck, Scott et.al. Method Development for Measuring Respirator Exhalation Valve Leakage. Am.Ind. Hyg. Assoc. 7(3): 174-179 (1992).

  3. Exhalation Valves • Consists of valve seat, valve, and valve cover • Allows for unidirectional airflow out of respirator • Prevents unfiltered air from entering respirator

  4. Regulations and Recommendations • OSHA • NIOSH • ANSI

  5. Negative Pressure User Seal Check (NPUSC) • Procedure • Cover filter/cartridge opening with palm of hand, • Inspire as to create a negative pressure to cause the respirator to collapse slightly, and • Hold breath for a designated amount of time • Criteria for Passing • Facepiece remains slightly collapsed AND • No inward air leakage is detected

  6. Respirator Leak Checker™ • Measurement device developed by Drs. Freeman and McKay, Univ. of Cincinnati • Measures in-mask pressure differentials • Assesses ability of respirator wearers to properly conduct a USC

  7. Hypotheses 1. Test subjects can identify respirator leakage due to damaged exhalation valves by performing NPUSCs. 2. The RLC can detect respirator leakage due to damaged exhalation valves.

  8. Materials • Full facepiece elastomeric respirator with oral/nasal cup • Exhalation Valves 1. Undamaged (control) 2. Warped 3. Slit 4. Adhesive

  9. Materials con’t. • Ambient aerosol (AA) condensation nuclei counter- T.S.I. PortaCount Plus • Controlled negative pressure (CNP)- Dynatech Nevada 3000 • In-mask pressure differential- Respirator Leak Checker

  10. Test Protocol • Respirator size selected and donned • Test subject trained • The following tests were performed for each valve (beginning and ending with the control exhalation valve): • NPUSC • RLC measurement • TSI PortaCount measurement • Dynatech Nevada Fit Tester 3000 measurement

  11. Select and don respirator Perform NPUSC and obtain RLC measurement Perform PortaCount fit test Perform Dynatech Nevada fit test Yes No Replace with next exhalation valve? Stop

  12. Modifications from OSHA Protocol • NPUSC • Held breath for 7 seconds instead of the OSHA required 10 seconds • TSI PortaCount • Test subject remained facing straight ahead during all measurements • Fit factor calculated from third maneuver

  13. Modifications from OSHA Protocol con’t. • Dynatech Nevada Fit Tester 3000 • Fit factor calculated from first maneuver, normal breathing, head facing straight ahead

  14. Data Analysis • Fit factors analyzed using a repeated measure analysis of variance (ANOVA) to determine differences between valves • Maximum pressure generated and time above threshold during NPUSC were analyzed using ANOVA to determine differences between valves

  15. Test Subject Characteristics • 26 test subjects included in study • 54% male/46% female • 50% were experienced respirator wearers

  16. Relationship Between Fit Factors and Percent Failing/Unsure NPUSCs

  17. In-Mask Pressure Differential Measurements During NPUSC • 98% (102/104) met the criteria set for passing the NPUSC • Failed tests occurred with the undamaged and slit valves • No significant difference between maximum pressure generated and time above threshold between the damaged and undamaged valves

  18. Conclusions • NPUSCs rarely identified leakage due to exhalation valve damage • RLC was useful for assessing ability to conduct NPUSC • Inspection, fit testing, and NPUSC is needed to maintain proper protection

  19. Acknowledgements • Support for this research was received in part through the NIOSH ERC Grant to the University of Cincinnati (T42 CCT510420) and from the University of Cincinnati • Dr. Roy McKay

More Related