1 / 10

ENTER.HUB LAP peer reviews. Final integration workshop, Łódź, PL

This workshop focuses on the implementation and legitimacy of the Local Action Plan (LAP) for the project "Gare, coeur d'agglo" in Łódź. It aims to bring together all stakeholders involved in the project to officially present the LAP and discuss issues related to human capital and mobility. The workshop will also address the challenges of linking local and transnational exchanges, managing the LAP, and ensuring its sustainability.

jamesphelan
Download Presentation

ENTER.HUB LAP peer reviews. Final integration workshop, Łódź, PL

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ENTER.HUBLAP peer reviews. Final integration workshop, Łódź, PL 9th – 10th of October, 2014

  2. 1. Legitimacy - Implementation 2. Meet all the stakeholders to present their the LAP officially after finalizing (mail to the coordinator responsible), also the architects of the project “Gare, coeur d’agglo”

  3. 14 since 2013 Before each workshop 6 persons for each group (human capital and mobility ULSG PSO Neighbouring municipality communities Civil society CCLVD GARE, CŒUR D’AGGLO Development Council DDT PARTNERSHIP PROTOCOL CAC Creil Nogent-sur-Oise Conseil Général Conseil Régional SMTCO SNCF RFF DREAL Oise-la-Vallée Employment center EPFLO SODA IUT Employment stakeholders UTC Universities

  4. 1. City context

  5. 2. Theme Human Capital High unemployment Bad attractivity Poor synergy between the stakeholders Many different cultures Inadequation between people and jobs

  6. 2. Theme Human Capital The hard = Master plan • District of the culture : master plan must add on it • Creative spaces (art, entrepreneurship, exchanges, research) : beginning in 2015 • Platform grouping devices in creating : beginning in 2015 The soft = LAP

  7. 2. Theme Mobility Congestion Less quality of the public spaces Complexity and multiple actors Good rail infrastructure Leading car use

  8. 2. Theme Mobility The hard = Master plan • Diagnosis walking : in 2015 • Walking tours commented : not yet decided • Creation of a coordinating committee of supply : 2014 • Reflection on the prospects for Roissy hub and for the star : 2014 The soft = LAP

  9. 6. Risk analysis

  10. Conclusions • ULSG : meetings, work habits, different views, colaboration, stakeholder and problem identification, articulation scale, methodology, freedom, inhabitants are in the centre of the reflections… • Difficulties in linking Local and transnational exchanges. How do the other partners ? • PAL : requires a significant investment in time including • How do you manage it ? • Legitimacy to implement the PAL ? • Which links between the PAL and the Masterplan? • Reflection to the sustainability of the ULSG : new themes (particularly participation) • Do other partners think on it ?

More Related