150 likes | 281 Views
Partnering with watershed organizations to produce tributary-specific report cards. Caroline WIcks EcoCheck (NOAA-UMCES Partnership) Virginia Water Quality Monitoring Summit October 22, 2011. Outline. Ecosystem health report cards Purpose of MTAC
E N D
Partnering with watershed organizations to produce tributary-specific report cards Caroline WIcks EcoCheck (NOAA-UMCES Partnership) Virginia Water Quality Monitoring Summit October 22, 2011
Outline • Ecosystem health report cards • Purpose of MTAC • Development of sampling and analysis protocols for tidal indicators • Finished document • Next steps & upcoming products • Acknowledgements
Provide a performance-derived grade for an ecosystem component or a geographic region Enable communication of complex information to a broad audience Can provide accountability; measuring the success of a particular effort Identify regions or issues of concern Ecosystem health report cards are popular education and outreach tools
Differences in scale matter • What about my local river? • Local monitoring programs are able to collect information at a finer scale than state or national agencies
Purpose of MTAC • Mid-Atlantic Tributary Assessment Coalition • Formed to foster collaboration & enhance report card utility across water systems • Increase scientific validity • Standardize indicators and methods • Provide guidelines for successful report card production • Develop protocol document!
Development of sampling & analysis protocols • Select indicators • Six core, but elective indicators are also encouraged
Development of sampling & analysis protocols • Reach consensus on sampling guidelines • Temporal sampling regime • Preferred vs. minimum time periods, resolution
Development of sampling & analysis protocols • Reach consensus on sampling guidelines • Location of sampling sites • Sub-region delineation • Salinity regime • Depth • Location of sampling sites
Development of sampling & analysis protocols • For each indicator, reach consensus on: • Field sampling procedures • Laboratory analysis methods (if necessary) • Data analysis methods • Criteria to use? • Scoring techniques • Pass/fail • Multiple thresholds
Example –Chlorophyll a • Field sampling procedures • Necessary equipment • Sample collection process • Preparation of samples for analysis • Laboratory analysis • Each chapter begins with an introduction to the indicator
Example – Analysis and scoring of Chlorophyll a data • Explain threshold criteria, data sorting & organization process • Step by step scoring process • Station scores • Sub-region scores • Area weighting to find overall region scores
Development of sampling & analysis protocols • Provide guidelines for synthesis and communication of results via a report card • Think about communication strategy
Final product! • Available as a free PDF download (along with tributary report cards and other documents) at: www.eco-check.org • Direct link to PDF: http://ian.umces.edu/pdfs/ecocheck_report_313.pdf
Next steps & upcoming products • Continue to grow… • Bacteria meetings were held in Spring 2011, supplementary document forthcoming • Beginning work on non-tidal protocol document Fall 2011, expect completion during 2012
Acknowledgements MTAC is funded in part by the Chesapeake Bay Trust Thank you: Caroline Wicks, Heath Kelsey, Bill Dennison, Jana Davis, Katie Foreman, Peter Bergstrom, Diana Muller, Chris Trumbauer, Ron Melcer, Carol Cain, Cathy Wazniak, Carol McCollough, Jamie Brunkow, Megan Ward, Beth Wasden, Rupert Rossettti, Theaux Le Gardeur, Sally Hornor, David Florez, Eliza Smith Steinmeier, Brent Bolin, & Masaya Maeda • Link to protocol document (PDF): • http://ian.umces.edu/pdfs/ • ecocheck_report_313.pdf