340 likes | 544 Views
Outsourcing – What Makes Sense?. Charles R. Williams Benedictine University. Why Do We Outsource?. Lack of In-House Skills Operating Efficiencies Cost Savings Access to Innovative Service. What Do We Outsource. IT Infrastructure Application Management Application Services
E N D
Outsourcing – What Makes Sense? Charles R. Williams Benedictine University
Why Do We Outsource? • Lack of In-House Skills • Operating Efficiencies • Cost Savings • Access to Innovative Service C. R. Williams
What Do We Outsource • IT Infrastructure • Application Management • Application Services • Distributed Services • Business Processes • Processing Services • E-Learning/Distance Learning C. R. Williams
Problems with Outsourcing • Lack of Cooperation Among Internal Units • Vendors Don’t Fulfill Their Promises • Implementation Takes Longer Than Expected • Project Goes Over Budget • Technical Problems Make It Impossible to Meet Expectations C. R. Williams
Problems with Outsourcing • Vendor Is Unfamiliar with the Needs of Higher Education • Flawed Process • Resistance from Collective Bargaining Units C. R. Williams
History • Benedictine Outsourced IT in the Late 1990s • Also Outsourced Security, Campus Services, Bookstore, and Food Service • Vendor Provided All IT Staff • CIO Initially Reported to the Provost then to the Executive Vice President • Joint Faculty-Staff Governance Committee C. R. Williams
Reasons That Benedictine Reconsidered • Inconsistent Alignment with the University’s Strategic Direction • Lack of Tight Integration Between IT and Other Departments • Staffing Stability • CIO Turnover • Control over Vendor’s Staff • Lack of Expected Cost Savings C. R. Williams
Inconsistent Alignment with the University’s Strategic Direction • Started with Tight Alignment • University Staffing Changed • CIOs Changed • Led to Vendor Governance Model • Led to … C. R. Williams
Lack of Tight Integration Between IT and Other Departments • An Ineffective Governance Structure • Shadow Systems Completely Outside of the ERP System • Functions Retained in IT C. R. Williams
Stability of Staff • Presumed Benefit – More Professional Staff • Small Client => Training Location for Vendor Staff • “It’s never long before any HR problems your supplier has trickle down to you.” – Susan Overby, CIO C. R. Williams
CIO Turnover • Continuity in This Position Is Important • Alignment with Senior Administrators Is Important • Initial Vendor CIO Is a Sales Representative/Turnover CIO • “A lot of the complaints you hear from people who have outsourced is actually disappointment in the level of quality of the outsourcers’ staff.” -- Orlov C. R. Williams
Loss of Control Over IT • Turnover at the CIO Level • Turnover at the Senior Administrator Level • Led to Lack of Continuity • Led to the Use of Vendor Policies & Procedures • Led to Ceding the Responsibility for IT to the Vendor • Led to Loss of Control C. R. Williams
No Longer Seeing Cost Savings • Cost Savings Existed at the Beginning • The University Desired More Services • The Vendor Was Willing to Sell More Services • Led to Increasing Payments for Staff • Led to Loss of Savings to Reinvest in Better Uses of Technology • Led to … C. R. Williams
A New RFP • Solicited New Proposals • Range of Cost from About $1.4M to $5.6M • Led to an Evaluation of an In-House Department • Led to the Termination of the Contract to Outsource and the Creation of an In-House IT Department C. R. Williams
Issues to Consider • The Timing of the Change • The Hiring of New Staff • The Transition Time & Staffing • The Loss of Institutional Memory • The Cost of the Transition • The Problems the Vendor Will Have with Its Staff C. R. Williams
The Timing of the Change • Critical to the Success of the Transition • Constraints on Timing • Contract Termination Clauses • Cost to Buyout the Contract • Required Notice of Termination • Use the Period after Notification Wisely • Hire Staff (Even from Outside Education) • Begin Knowledge Transfer C. R. Williams
The Hiring of New Staff • No Compete/No Solicitation Clauses • CIO Who Reflects Institution’s Goals and Style Is First Priority • If You Have Time, Design the Organization (A Luxury) • Direct Reports Next • Use Them to Help Hire Additional Staff • “New Leader in Town” Issues Too C. R. Williams
The Transition Time & Staffing • Ideally Transition Should Be a Year • Not Likely – Too Expensive • The More Overlap The Better the Transition • What Happens to Existing Vendor Staff after Notice is Given? • This is Critical to Success – Build it into the Initial Contract C. R. Williams
The Loss of Institutional Memory • An Abnormal Staff Transition • Some Information Will Be Lost in Transition • Routine Tasks Are Especially Critical C. R. Williams
The Cost of the Transition • Will Be Larger than You Planned • Salary Issues • New Employee Training & Inefficiencies • Need to Continue to Outsource Part of the Staff • Consequences to Relationship Building of the Intense Hiring Process C. R. Williams
The Problems the Vendor Will Have with Its Staff • Loss of Staff Who Wish to Stay in the Area • Transfer of Staff • Need to Capture Institutional Memory before They Leave C. R. Williams
Lessons Learned • Plan for Success & Plan for Failure • Get Institutional Buy-In • Plan for a Long Transition Period • Leadership is Critical to Success • Use Other Resources During the Transition • Maintain Control over the Outsourced Department C. R. Williams
Plan for Success & Plan for Failure • When You Outsource, Plan for Both. • Success • Leads to Adding Services • Plan to Eliminate No Longer Needed Services C. R. Williams
Plan for Success & Plan for Failure • Success • Sean Barker • Maintain Control • Measure, Measure, Measure • Marry the Partner • Take Responsibility for Requirements • Review Regularly C. R. Williams
Plan for Success & Plan for Failure • Failure • The Vendor May Move out of Your Market • The Vendor May Go out of Business • Your Management May Change • You May Not Meet the Vendor’s Requirements • The Vendor May Not Meet Your Requirements C. R. Williams
Plan for Success & Plan for Failure • Consequences • Negotiate Service Increases • Negotiate Exit Strategy • Make your outsourcing decision rationally with the full understanding of the process, the consequences, and the issues of bringing the department back in house. C. R. Williams
Get Institutional Buy-In • From the Most Junior Positions • To the Governing Board • In-sourcing is Complex • The New Staff Needs Institutional Support • Anyone Can Cause the Process to Fail • Our Success is Attributable to Institutional Leadership C. R. Williams
Plan for a Long Transition Period • This will take longer than you expect. • Short Transition Period Leads to Lack of Understanding of Vendor Decisions • For Example, No Planning Context • At Least Six Months • Shorter & You Pay in Lost Opportunities while New Staff Learns C. R. Williams
Leadership is Critical to Success • Institutional Leadership & Support Are Critical • Departmental Leadership Is Key • The New Staff Must Trust & Respect Its Leader • Performance Is Critical C. R. Williams
Use Other Resources During the Transition • They can help with the transition process. • We used an IT auditor from our auditing firm to help with positions, organizational structure, and managing the process • We used our area peer institutions in defining positions and establishing competitive salaries. C. R. Williams
Maintain Control over the Outsourced Department • From the Beginning • Outsource the Work not the Control and Responsibility • If You Do, You Lose • Bringing It Back Will Be Difficult C. R. Williams
Maintain Control over the Outsourced Department • “An outsourcing decision should never be made with the idea of removing all risk or responsibility for something – recruiting or otherwise. The work may move; responsibility stays.” --Overby C. R. Williams
OPEN DISCUSSION! C. R. Williams
Contact Information Charles R. (Randy) Williams Benedictine University 5700 College Road Lisle, IL 60532 630-829-6025 cwilliams@ben.edu C. R. Williams