1 / 9

Drake Curriculum Analysis Committee

Drake Curriculum Analysis Committee. Update December 2012. Drake Curriculum Analysis Committee. Lots to do Work with the Director of Institutional Research and Assessment to develop a rolling plan for assessment …

janice
Download Presentation

Drake Curriculum Analysis Committee

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Drake Curriculum Analysis Committee Update December 2012

  2. Drake Curriculum Analysis Committee • Lots to do • Work with the Director of Institutional Research and Assessment to • develop a rolling plan for assessment … • evaluate the data for evidence of student learning and make recommendations for program improvement… • evaluate the effectiveness of the assessment instruments and procedures … • Encourage participation by faculty, staff, and students in assessment • Report assessment results on a regular basis… • Consult with the Associate Provost for Curriculum and Assessment regarding faculty and staff development programs … • Liaise with the colleges and schools to share general education and program assessment data …

  3. Drake Curriculum Analysis Committee • Goals for the year: long-term view • Develop working precepts-shared vision • Taking inventory of assessment thus far • Create key components of an assessment plan • Transition to the ‘review and recommending’ body • Large task • Measurement with intent to improve

  4. Drake Curriculum Analysis Committee • Develop working precepts • Timeline of AOI review • Multiple methods of investigation • Direct, rubrics, embedded assessments; • Indirect; self-assessments, • Quantitative and qualitative; curricular and co-curricular; meaningful to faculty; • Focus on program evaluation • What process can be repeated across AOIs?

  5. Drake Curriculum Analysis Committee • Inventory • What existing data do we have? How might that data support the plan(e.g., NSSE, Drake Survey, CLA) • Other Campus work • Critical Thinking • Information Literacy • What data is missing? • How will information be shared • How to garner collaboration with faculty

  6. Assessment Implementation

  7. % of FYS Papers Receiving a Median Rating of “Less than satisfactory”

  8. Select results from Drake 2010-2011 Collegiate Learning Assessment

  9. CT Closing The Loop • May 2012 workshop (Robertson & Roth) • Support needed to promote Critical Thinking • Assignment design • Struggle with assumptions/alternatives • CT Faculty working group (6 faculty, 4 schools/colleges) • Strategies for sharing results and best practices • Recommendations for engaging wider audience

More Related