1 / 12

Homework Exercise

Homework Exercise. Megan Morava. Problem 1. Accounting for R&D Expensing vs. Capitalizing Comparing RNEA and REI under both accounting methods Value of the firm under each method Forecasting until steady state. Expensing R&D.

janice
Download Presentation

Homework Exercise

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Homework Exercise Megan Morava

  2. Problem 1 • Accounting for R&D • Expensing vs. Capitalizing • Comparing RNEA and REI under both accounting methods • Value of the firm under each method • Forecasting until steady state

  3. Expensing R&D • Each dollar of R&D spent expected to generate $1.60 of revenue over each of the subsequent five years • R&D expense is $100 each year • Other expenses are 80% of sales

  4. Capitalizing R&D • R&D expenditures are no longer constant, instead capitalized and amortized over a five year period

  5. Comparison of RNEA and REI • RNEA and REI much lower under expensing than capitalizing at start, but ends up being much greater in later years • This is because under the expensing method, enterprise income is much lower in early years • However, NEA is much greater under capitalizing method, causing RNEA and REI to be lower comparatively in later years

  6. RNEA and REI forecasted in 2020 • RNEA and REI are higher under the expensing method than the capitalizing method in 2020 • This is caused by higher NEA under the capitalizing method • 80 vs. 280

  7. Valuing the Firm • The value of the firm is the same under both accounting treatments • Income shifting does not change intrinsic value of the firm • If you only forecasted to 2016, steady-state would not be reached (REI growth does not equal 0%) and the true enterprise value would not be reflected

  8. Part g • RNEA is higher even though revenue is growing at a slower rate • This is caused by higher net income starting in 2016 and onward • Lower income driven by less R&D expense in later years

  9. Problem 2 • Forecasts of EPAT and NEA under 3-year vs. 5-year depreciation method • Which method shows the firm to be more profitable in 2017 before the IPO? • Depreciation method does not affect intrinsic value of firm

  10. EPAT and NEA: 3-year vs. 5-year

  11. Depreciation Method & Intrinsic Value

  12. Analysis • 5-year depreciation shows firm to be more profitable in 2017, just prior to IPO • 388.50 vs 488.50 • Caused by lower depreciation expense under 5-year depreciation method • Depreciation method does not change intrinsic value of the firm • While the market may look to earnings, the intrinsic value of the firm doesn’t change so it should not affect IPO • Profits will be equal in 2022 when stock options vest • Argument for 3-year depreciation method, because depreciation is accelerated, causing great tax benefits

More Related