1 / 18

Hypothesis-Generating Interviews

Learn how to conduct hypothesis-generating interviews for outbreak investigations, including case-patient selection, question formulation, and interviewing techniques. Understand the importance of these interviews in identifying potential sources of exposure and transmission modes. Enhance your outbreak investigation skills.

janiej
Download Presentation

Hypothesis-Generating Interviews

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Hypothesis-Generating Interviews

  2. Goals • Discuss the uses of hypothesis-generating interviews • Present information on case-patient selection, questions to ask and when and where to conduct hypothesis-generating interviews. • Provide useful tips on how to conduct an interview during an outbreak.

  3. Why use hypothesis-generating interviews? • To obtain initial clues on possible sources of exposure • To develop a hypotheses-testing questionnaire • To identify signs and symptoms of the disease

  4. Why use hypothesis-generating interviews? • To help develop or refine the case definition • To develop a develop a demographic profile and identify the population at risk • To develop a list of potential exposures

  5. Who Do We Interview? • Case-patients • 8 to 10 • Differing demographic profiles • Typical clinical presentation • Occurring in the middle of the outbreak • Family member or friend if case-patient is unavailable • Parent or guardian if case-patient is a child • Health care providers, lab workers, clinical staff

  6. Who Do We Interview? • Examples: • 1984-1985 Minnesota outbreak of Thyrotoxicosis • 1997 Michigan and Virginia Salmonella outbreaks

  7. What Do We Ask? • Use existing hypothesis-generating resources as a template and guide • However, each outbreak is unique and questions should meet the needs of the investigation at hand • Contact others who have investigated similar outbreaks • Adapt the questionnaires used to the particular setting

  8. What Do We Ask? • Basic demographic information • Clinical details • Activities • Food consumption

  9. What Do We Ask? • Known or suspected agent • Likely exposures • Known reservoirs • Modes of transmission • Activities occurring during a specific period based on known incubation period and date of onset • Unknown agent • Broad, less specific questions • Activities, clinical signs and symptoms

  10. When And Where Do We Conduct The Interview • Early in the investigation • Case-patients’ homes or health care setting • Other settings • e.g. the local health department, if several case-patients need to be brought together • Unusual approaches may be required • 1981 epidemic of listeriosis in Canada • 1983 epidemic of listeriosis in Massachusetts

  11. How Do We Conduct The Interview? • Face to face • Telephone (under special circumstances) • Language considerations • Age, level of education, and other case-patient characteristics • Culturally sensitive wording • Mindful of uncomfortable topic areas • Avoid jargon and abbreviations

  12. How Do We Conduct The Interview? • Standardized forms • Types of questions • Closed-ended • Open-ended

  13. How Do We Conduct The Interview? • Tips: • Review the literature • Obtain background information • Enhance interviewing and people skills • Act friendly and professional • Use memory aids

  14. How Do We Conduct The Interview? • Tips: • Introduce yourself and give your credentials • Explain the purpose of the interview and tell the case-patient how long the interview will take • Be systematic but flexible when questioning • Provide contact information • Thank the interviewee for participating • Acknowledge his or her contribution to the investigation

  15. Conclusions • Hypothesis-generating interviews increase efficiency of outbreak investigations by • helping confirm the existence of an outbreak • providing insights on potential causative agents • identifying potential sources of exposure and modes of transmission • From the information obtained, investigators • create case definitions • construct epi-curves • proceed to test hypotheses through analytic studies

  16. References 1. Reingold, A. Outbreak investigations—a perspective. Emerg Infect Dis. Jan-Mar 1998;4:21-27. 2. Cummings SR, Stewart AL, Hulley SB. Designing questionnaires and data collection instruments. In Hulley SB, Cummings SR, Browner WS et al, eds. Designing clinical research. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2001:231-245. 3. CDC Epidemiology Program Office. Case studies in applied epidemiology. No 873-703. An epidemic of Thyrotoxicosis. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/eis/casestudies/Xthyrotox.instruct.873-703.pdf.

  17. References 4. Breuer T, Benkel DH, Shapiro RL, et al. A multistate outbreak of Escherichia coli O157:H7 infections linked to alfalfa sprouts grown from contaminated seeds.  Emerg Infect Dis. 2001;7(6):977-982. Available from http://wwwcdc.gov/ncidod/eid/vol7no6/breuer.htm. 5. US Department of Health and Human Services. Principles of epidemiology. An introduction to applied epidemiology and biostatistics. 2nd ed. Self-study course 3030-G. Lesson 6: Investigating an outbreak. Available at http://www.phppo.cdc.gov/PHTN/catalog/pdf-file/Epi_Course.pdf.  

  18. References 6. Schlech WF, Lavigne PM, Bortolussi RA, et al. Epidemic listeriosis—evidence for transmission by food. N Engl J Med. 1983;308:203-206. 7. Fleming DW, Cochi SL, MacDonald KL, et al. Pasteurized milk as a vehicle of infection in an outbreak of listeriosis. N Engl J Med. 1985;312:404-407.

More Related