1 / 108

Adaptive Imaging Preliminary: Speckle Correlation Analysis

Adaptive Imaging Preliminary: Speckle Correlation Analysis. sample volume. transducer. Speckle Formation. Speckle results from coherent interference of un-resolvable objects. It depends on both the frequency and the distance. Speckle Second-Order Statistics.

jaquelinet
Download Presentation

Adaptive Imaging Preliminary: Speckle Correlation Analysis

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Adaptive Imaging Preliminary:Speckle Correlation Analysis

  2. sample volume transducer Speckle Formation • Speckle results from coherent interference of un-resolvable objects. It depends on both the frequency and the distance.

  3. Speckle Second-Order Statistics • The auto-covariance function of the received phase-sensitive signals (i.e., before envelope detection) is simply the convolution of the system’s point spread function if the insonified region is • macroscopically slow-varying. • microscopically un-correlated.

  4. Speckle Second-Order Statistics • The shape of a speckle spot (assuming fully developed) is simply determined by the shape of the point spread function. • The higher the spatial resolution, the finer the speckle pattern, and vice versa.

  5. Speckle Statistics • The above statements do not hold if the object has structures compared to or larger than the ultrasonic wavelength. • Rician distribution is often used for more general scatterer distribution. • Rayleigh distribution is a special case of Rician distribution.

  6. van Cittert-Zernike Theorem • A theorem originally developed in statistical optics. • It describes the second-order statistics of the field produced by an in-coherent source. • The insonification of diffuse scatterers is assumed in-coherent. • It is different from the aforementioned lateral displacement.

  7. van Cittert-Zernike Theorem • The theorem describes the spatial covariance of signals received at two different points in space. • For a point target, the correlation of the two signals should simply be 1. • For speckle, correlation decreases since the received signal changes.

  8. van Cittert-Zernike Theorem • The theorem assumes that the target is microscopically un-correlated. • The spatial covariance function is the Fourier transform of the radiation pattern at the point of interest.

  9. correlation radiation pattern van Cittert-Zernike Theorem

  10. van Cittert-Zernike Theorem • The theorem states that the correlation coefficient decreases from 1 to 0 as the distance increases from 0 to full aperture size. • The correlation is independent of the frequency, aperture size, …etc.

  11. van Cittert-Zernike Theorem • In the presence of tissue inhomogeneities, the covariance function is narrower since the radiation pattern is wider. • The decrease in correlation results in lower accuracy in estimation if signals from different channels are used.

  12. van Cittert-Zernike Theorem correlation distance

  13. van Cittert-Zernike Theorem RF Signals Channel Time (Range)

  14. van Cittert-Zernike Theorem(Focal length 60mm vs. 90mm)

  15. van Cittert-Zernike Theorem(16 Elements vs. 31 Elements)

  16. van Cittert-Zernike Theorem(2.5MHz vs. 3.5MHz)

  17. van Cittert-Zernike Theorem(with Aberrations)

  18. correlation coefficient displacement L/2 Lateral Speckle Correlation

  19. Lateral Speckle Correlation • Assuming the target is at focus, the correlation roughly decreases linearly as the lateral displacement increases. • The correlation becomes zero when the displacement is about half the aperture size. • Correlation may decrease in the presence of non-ideal beam formation.

  20. Lateral Speckle Correlation 14.4 mm Array

  21. Lateral Speckle Correlation

  22. Lateral Speckle Correlation

  23. Lateral Speckle Correlation

  24. Lateral Speckle Correlation: Implications on Spatial Compounding

  25. Speckle Tracking • Estimation of displacement is essential in many imaging areas such as Doppler imaging and elasticity imaging. • Speckle targets, which generally are not as ideal as points targets, must be used in many clinical situations.

  26. Speckle Tracking • From previous analysis on speckle analysis, we found the local speckle patterns simply translate assuming the displacement is small. • Therefore, speckle patterns obtained at two instances are highly correlated and can be used to estimate 2D displacements.

  27. Speckle Tracking • Displacements can also be found using phase changes (similar to the conventional Doppler technique). • Alternatively, displacements in space can be estimated by using the linear phase shifts in the spatial frequency domain.

  28. Speckle Tracking • Tracking of the speckle pattern can be used for 2D blood flow imaging. Conventional Doppler imaging can only track axial motion. • Techniques using phase information are still inherently limited by the nature of Doppler shifts.

  29. Adaptive Imaging Methods:Correlation-Based Approach

  30. body wall viscera point of interest v1 v2 v3 transducer array Sound Velocity Inhomogeneities

  31. Velocity (m/sec) water 1484 blood 1550 myocardium 1550 fat 1450 liver 1570 kidney 1560 Sound Velocity Inhomogeneities

  32. Sound Velocity Inhomogeneities • Sound velocity variations result in arrival time errors. • Most imaging systems assume a constant sound velocity. Therefore, sound velocity variations produce beam formation errors. • The beam formation errors are body type dependent.

  33. Sound Velocity Inhomogeneities • Due to beam formation errors, mainlobe may be wider and sidelobes may be higher. • Both spatial and contrast resolution are affected. no errors with errors

  34. beam formation geometric delay aligned velocity variations correction Near Field Assumption • Assuming the effects of sound velocity inhomogeneities can be modeled as a phase screen at the face of the transducer, beam formation errors can be reduced by correcting the delays between channels.

  35. Correlation-Based Aberration Correction No Focusing

  36. Correlation-Based Aberration Correction Transmit Focusing Only

  37. Correlation-Based Aberration Correction Transmit and Receive Focusing

  38. Correlation-Based Aberration Correction Wire: Before Correction Wire: After Correction

  39. Correlation-Based Aberration Correction Diffuse Scatterers: Before Diffuse Scatterers: After

  40. Correlation Based Method • Time delay (phase) errors are found by finding the peak of the cross correlation function. • It is applicable to both point and diffuse targets.

  41. Correlation Based Method • The relative time delays between adjacent channels need to be un-wrapped. • Estimation errors may propagate.

  42. Correlation Based Method • Two assumptions for diffuse scatterers: • spatial white noise. • high correlation (van Cittert-Zernike theorem). filter correlator Dx

  43. Correlation Based Method • Correlation using signals from diffuse scatterers under-estimates the phase errors. • The larger the phase errors, the more severe the underestimation. • Iteration is necessary (a stable process).

  44. Alternative Methods • Correlation based method is equivalent to minimizing the l2 norm. Some alternative methods minimize the l1 norm. • Correlation based method is equivalent to a maximum brightness technique.

  45. Baseband Method • The formulation is very similar to the correlation technique used in Color Doppler.

  46. CORDIC acc. I I Q Q sign control Q sign bit acc. CORDIC acc. Baseband Method

  47. One-Dimensional Correction:Problems • Sound velocity inhomogeneities are not restricted to the array direction. Therefore, two-dimensional correction is necessary in most cases. • The near field model may not be correct in some cases.

  48. One-Dimensional Correction:Problems

  49. One-Dimensional Correction:Problems

  50. Two-Dimensional Correction • Using 1D arrays, time delay errors can only be corrected along the array direction. • The signal received by each channel of a 1D array is an average signal. Hence, estimation accuracy may be reduced if the elevational height is large. • 2D correction is necessary.

More Related