290 likes | 397 Views
2141 Technical Assistance Trainings. March 2010. Welcome. Third annual 2141 Club meeting Recognizing new members Introductions Developing a support network. Accountability. HQT Plans
E N D
2141 Technical Assistance Trainings March 2010
Welcome • Third annual 2141 Club meeting • Recognizing new members • Introductions • Developing a support network
Accountability • HQT Plans • The SEA enters into an agreement on the use of funds with any LEA that has not made progress toward meeting its annual measurable objectives (AMO) in meeting the highly qualified teacher challenge for three consecutive years and has also failed to make AYP for three years. 2141 (c)
AYP and HQT • District has not met AYP for at least 3 consecutive years • District does not have 100% of classes taught by HQT for at least 3 consecutive years
Requirements • Develop plan • Components of Plan • Title IIA funding • Paraprofessionals
Mountain, Coast, High Desert Partners __________ _ ___________ ____________ Job Alike
Connector: Sharing Successes • Individually • Pick up 4 square post-its - two PINK and two YELLOW. • The PINK post-its represent areas of greatest program strength • The YELLOW post-its represent areas for greatest program growth • Jot down areas of strength and areas for growth, one idea per post-it.
Connector: Sharing Successes • Find your Coast Partner and share your program successes.
Outcomes • To learn from and with other district teams about effective practices through the sharing and analyzing of artifacts of practice • To assess professional development program strengths and challenges and apply new insights to your program context • To engage in network dialogue and learning • To learn the requirements for compliance under 2141(c)
Collaborative Norms • Equity of Voice • Active Listening • Safety for all perspectives • Confidentiality • Others
Evidence of Implementation • How are you monitoring progress? • To what degree is a program achieving what it said it would accomplish?
Implementation of New Strategies • Mentoring Model • 49 hours on average over 6-12 month period for teachers to be able to use new strategies effectively. Yoon, et. al. 2007
Effects of Training and Coaching on Teacher’s Implementation
Sharing Artifacts of Practice • In your district team prepare the story behind your artifact of implementation • Be prepared to address its original intent, how it might be changed, what was learned • Share the artifact and story with Mountain partner
Sharing Artifacts of Practice (Continued) • Join with another group of 2 and share examples • Go to a table and review other examples of evidence of implementation and discuss • Be ready to share what your group has found.
Program Evaluation • To what degree is the professional development program having the effect it intended. • Five Levels of PD evaluation
Critical Levels of PD Evaluation • Participants’ Reactions • Participants’ Learning • Organizational Support and Change • Participants’ Use of New Knowledge and Skills • Improvement of Student Learning • Narrowing of Student Achievement Gaps
Sharing Artifacts of Practice • In your district use the 5 Levels of PD Evaluation to determine what levels your plan addresses • Share the artifact of impact and with High Desert partner
Sharing Artifacts of Practice (Continued) • Join with another group of 2 and share examples • Go to a table and review other examples of evidence of impact and discuss • Be ready to share what your group has found
Standards for Professional Development • Context Standards • Content Standards • Process Standards
The Guide • 9 components • Summary of Needs analysis • Identified Needs • SMART Goals • HQT Goal • Strategies/Activities • Implementation • Evaluation • Coherence • Progression
The Guide…cont. • 3 Levels • Developing • Established • Advanced • It is possible to be in more than one level on the same component
The Guide…cont. • Highlight the appropriate level for each component • Write clarifying comments in the comment column • Come to a consensus within the reading team about the level and comments when producing the master copy
Feedback… • Presented in language that enables the recipient to understand the criticism but not become defensive • Feedback to be received without interruption • Recipients may then ask clarifying question
Reporting Requirements • Must report teacher status in Staff Assignment Collection • Opened February 4, 2010 • Closes April 2, 2010
Next Steps • Complete Professional Development Plan • Staff Assignment: HQT data review in May • Submit to ODE by June 15, 2010 • Plans reviewed and feedback to districts by August 1, 2010