350 likes | 545 Views
European Commission. The new European regulatory framework for railways « The Dutch future of European Rail » Amsterdam – 28/10 /2003 Jean-Arnold Vinois, Head of the “Railway Transport and Interoperability” Unit. Summary. 1 - European railways in figures 2 - EU legislation in force
E N D
European Commission The new European regulatory framework for railways « The Dutch future of European Rail » Amsterdam – 28/10/2003 Jean-Arnold Vinois, Head of the “Railway Transport and Interoperability” Unit
Summary 1 - European railways in figures 2 - EU legislation in force 3 - EU legislation under examination 4 - Further proposals under preparation 5 - State of play of the reform 6 - The challenge of enlargement 7 - The challenge of financing the railways
Rail Passenger Traffic (billion p.km) EU(15) ? Source: Prognos + European Transport Report 2002
Rail Passenger Traffic Market Shares of Passenger Transport (in %) CEEC EU (15) Source: Prognos, European Transport Report 2002
Rail Passenger Traffic: trends High speed train Plane Conv. rail Car
Rail Freight Traffic (billion tkm) ? EU 15 Source: Prognos + European Transport Report 2002
Market Shares of Freight Transport (in %) CEEC EU (15) Source: Prognos, European Transport Report 2002
Rail Safety EU 15 Nbr of Fatalities Railway passengers Sources: UIC; National Statistics
Rail Safety Fatalities Railway crossings (EU 15) Sources: UIC; National Statistics
Financing State aids awarded to the Railway Sector MEUR
Financing State aids awarded to the Railway Sector MEUR
Optimise the use of existing infrastructure Rebalancing the use of modes in favour of environmental friendly modes : rail, inland waterways, shortsea shipping Fair and efficient pricing for infrastructures use Users first Aims of the European Transport Policy
« Creation of an integrated European railway area to allow cross border services under a single responsibility in order to guarantee the quality of services to the customer » A major objective of the European Railway Policy
Eurobarometer - Spring 2003 - EU 15 “If safety standards are met, competition is the best way to make the railways more efficient.” Tend to agree 71.5 % Tend to disagree 12.1 % No opinion 16.4 %
A. Decided 1. To ensure fair and non discriminatory access to the infrastructure Separation of essential functions i.e. allocation of capacity and charging Open access to infra and services for international freight services from 15 March 2003 on Transeuropean Rail Freight Network (TERFN) from 15 March 2008 on the whole network Charging principle of social marginal costs (with possible mark-ups) National regulatory body to survey functioning of the market and arbitrate conflicts between infra-manager and railway undertaking Main actions undertaken at European level
Main actions undertaken at European level A. Decided 2. To ensure interoperability of the network • High Speed (Dir. 96/48) • Trans-European Network for High Speed rail • Adoption of technical specifications for interoperability (TSI) for the whole system (plus European standards)In force since 30 Nov. 2002 • ERTMS deployment and migration strategy to be prepared by each Member State
Main actions undertaken at European level • Conventional Rail (Dir. 2001/16) • Applicable to TEN as identified (i.e. also TERFN) • Mandate to AEIF in June 2001 for TSI in 2004 on key items for freight traffic • New mandates to AEIF in Sept. 2002
Interoperability related activitiesProgramming mandates and TSI development
B. Broad agreement on the second packageTo be finally decided before end 2003 by Council and Parliament 1. Open access for international freight services on the whole network from 2006 and national services from 2008 (Council/EP conciliation on this) 2. Extension of interoperability requirement to the whole network (under conditions): accepted 3. Accession of the Community to OTIF: accepted Main actions undertaken at European level
4. Directive on railway safety Creation of national safety authority Delivery of safety certificate Common indicators, methods and targets Creation of independent investigation bodies for accidents 5. Creation of an European Railway Agency (ERA) from 2004 To prepare Technical Specifications for Interoperability with representatives of the sector To prepare Common Safety Methods and Targets To advise Commission and Member States 100 people (+ 15 Mio € a year) Main actions undertaken at European level
C. To be proposed in 2003Subject to decisions of the Commission 1. Access to the infrastructure for international passenger services (requested by EP for 2006). Issues to consider: High speed rail services Occasional services Cross border regional services Scheduled international services Problem of cabotage Link with Public service obligations Main actions undertaken at European level
2. Further discussion on the draft regulation on public services obligations after Altmark judgement(?) Regional and national services Obligation to tender if exclusive rights or compensation for P.S. 3. Rights and obligations of international rail passengers 4. Freight quality (compensation schemes considered) 5. Drivers licence directive Main actions undertaken at European level
State of Play 1. At European level • Enlargement to take place on 1/05/2004 - Accession Treaties concluded in April 2003. Successful referenda • Second package: EP 1st reading on 14 January 2003; common position of Council 26 June; EP second reading on 22 October 03 • New Commission proposals under preparation • Social Dialogue between CER and ETF successful • Competition rules (abuse of dominant position, restrictive agreements, state aids; e.g. GVG/FS recent decision) • Revision of TEN guidelines and priority projects and revision of TEN financial regulation (proposal 1st October 2003) • Preparation of EU financial perspectives 2007-2013
State of Play 2. At national level • Implementation of infrastructure package of 2001 by 15 March 2003 • Open access already in D-I-UK-NL-Nordic countries but some more legal work needed in D-UK-S. • Open access still to be concretised in B - F – L -SP particularly • Infringement procedures against 9 countries before the European Court of Justice • Real challenges : setting the various bodies such as regulatory body, independence of allocation body and definition of TERFN. • Interoperability • ERTMS deployment plan and migration strategy
State of Play EU Licensed railway undertakings(Notifications sent to the Commission)
State of Play 3. The players • Infrastructure managers : to prepare network statement and clear conditions for access (cfr. Rail Net Europe) • Railway undertakings : • Historic operators seeking alliances between them or with new entrants to facilitate cross border freight operations (eg. Mannheim-Woippy, Brenner Rail Cargo) • New entrants (IKEA, DLC, Rail4Chem, RTC, etc) challenging historic operators on some corridors (North-South, Brenner, etc.) • Improvement of services to be expected soon and better competitiveness against road
State of Play • Customers • Organize themselves to express their needs • European Rail Freight Customers Platform • European Passengers Federation • Supplying industry • Main driver of standardisation activity • Offers more interoperable equipments (eg. Multi current loc, ERTMS, etc) at reduced costs
State of Play Other aspects: • New partnerships between players • Border crossings problems to identify • Charter on Passenger services (CER) • Freight quality charter (CER) • Initiatives on quality indicators (UIRR, UIP)
The challenge of enlargement • To take place on 1 May 2004 • Participation of candidates to all European bodies from April 2003 • To implement the acquis communautaire by the time of accession • Open access for international freight services fromthe accession with 3 years transitional period for Poland and Hungary (up to end 2006)
A new railway geography after EU enlargement OTIF EU bilateral agreement EU (1st May 2004) EEA 15 + Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Czech Rep., Hungary, Slovakia, Poland, Slovenia Switzerland Balkanic States, Irak, Maroc, Algeria, Syria, Lebanon, Tunisia Norway Liecht. EU candidates Turkey Albania, Iran Bulgaria, Romania, Azerbaijan, Byelorussia, China, Cuba, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kirgizia, Korean PDR, Russia, Tajikistan Turkmenistan, Ukraine, Uzbekistan, Vietnam OSJD
The financing challenge • Trans-European network approach • Revision of guidelines to tackle accession countries and new list of 29 projects (Commission proposal 1st October 2003) • Idea of dedicated railfreight network • Revision of TEN financial regulation • Proposed support of 30 % to cross border projects • Revision of financial perspectives 2007-2013 • Securing infrastructure financing is a key issue • Revision of “Eurovignette” directive 99/62 • New rules of road charging • Cross modal financing possible under conditions
Conclusions • European Regulatory framework under way : there is a clear vision of all the aspects • A lot of work still to be done • Urgent need of the agency on interoperability and safety • Addressing all types of bottlenecks (short and long term actions needed) • Promoting a dedicated rail freight network • European ERTMS deployment plan for mid 2004 • Investments on infrastructure and rolling stock, particularly in accession countries • Huge tasks but mobilisation of players now visible
For further information: Site: http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/energy_transport/index_en.html