1 / 20

MARE ISLAND NAVAL SHIPYARD

MARE ISLAND NAVAL SHIPYARD. Mare Island Sites Time Critical Removal Action Presented By: David Godsey, Navy Dwight Gemar, Weston. RAB Meeting April 26, 2007. Time Critical Removal Action. Objectives/Scope

jarvis
Download Presentation

MARE ISLAND NAVAL SHIPYARD

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. MARE ISLAND NAVAL SHIPYARD Mare Island Sites Time Critical Removal Action Presented By: David Godsey, Navy Dwight Gemar, Weston RAB Meeting April 26, 2007

  2. Time Critical Removal Action • Objectives/Scope • Excavate soil with contaminant concentrations exceeding established target cleanup goals for five sites • Transport soil to Investigation Area H1 (IA-H1) for placement within the IA-H1 Containment Area as subgrade fill • Perform confirmation sampling of excavations • Restore sites • Timing • Coordinate with completion of IA-H1 Containment Area cap (in progress) 2

  3. Time Critical Removal Action (Scope) • TCRA sites • Installation Restoration Site 04 (IR04) • Paint Waste Area (PWA) • Defense Reutilization and Marketing Office Fenced Scrapyard Area (DRMO) • Horse Stable Area (HSA) • Installation Restoration Site 05 (IR05) • Soil Consolidation at IA-H1 • Consistent with approved Remedial Action Plan for IA-H1 (August 2006) 3

  4. Site IR04 Background • Formerly used for the disposal of expended abrasive blasting material (ABM) • ABM contaminants include copper, chromium, nickel, and zinc • Soil, sediment, and groundwater extensively characterized 1983-2006 • No munitions history (surveyed/investigated with no items encountered) • 2006 Remedial Investigation concluded that metals in soil and sediment pose unacceptable risks to the environment • Estimated TCRA soil removal volume is 20,000 cubic yards 4

  5. Site IR04 Photos Submarine Hull Sandblasting 1980 Photo of IR04 Site 5

  6. Paint Waste Area Background • Located in northern end of MI in an upland area adjacent to wetlands near Building 505 • Area containing exposed paint waste debris identified by U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service in 2002 • ~520 cubic yards of contaminated soil removed in 2003 removal action • Results of additional 2003 sampling indicate additional contaminated soil remains in/around the original site • Contaminants of concern are metals and organics • Estimated TCRA soil removal volume is 8,500 cubic yards 6

  7. Paint Waste Area Photos 2003 SMHM Protection Measures PWA Site During 2003 Removal Action 7

  8. DRMO Background • Located in central Mare Island near intersection of Azuar Drive and “A” Street • Former Defense Reutilization and Marketing Office scrapyard serving MINS and other activities (1942-2005) • Surveys completed between 1985 and 2002 identified lead oxide (submarine batteries) and PCBs (oil-filled transformers) as likely site contaminants • History of munitions and low-level radiological items • Addressed by 1996 and 2005-2006 removal actions • No longer realistic concerns • Contaminated areas under asphalt and outside DRMO fence remains • Estimated TCRA soil removal volume is 20,000 cubic yards 8

  9. DRMO Site Map and Step-Out Grids 1980 Photo 1967 Photo 9

  10. Horse Stable Area Background • 1.5 acre site located in the center of the Western Magazine Area • Expended ABM used as grading for stable facilities • 342 cubic yards of contaminated soil removed in 2003 based on visual survey • 2004 analysis of site soil and groundwater samples: • Chromium, arsenic, and lead exceeded human health comparison criteria at one or more location locations • Chromium, nickel, lead, and zinc exceeded conservative ecological benchmarks for soil • Estimated TCRA soil removal volume is 1,500 cubic yards 10

  11. Horse Stable Area Photo 11

  12. Site IR05 Background • Located on southern end of MI along Carquinez Strait • Munitions disposal area (burning and open detonation) from 1947 and 1975 • Also used for the open storage of munitions items • Contamination of the site by munitions documented by a series of investigations conducted 1982-1994 • Two munitions investigation/removal actions completed (1995-1997 MINS/SSPORTS and WESTON 2007) • Sampling data indicates metals and organics in soil pose a potential hazard to ecological receptors • Estimated TCRA soil removal volume is 40,000 cubic yards 12

  13. Site IR05 Photos 1950’s Munitions Disposal IR05 Site in 2006 13

  14. Target Cleanup Goals (TCGs) Development • Reuse considerations • Industrial (IR04, DRMO) • Open Space (PWA, HSA, IR05) • Ecological risk • Ecological Receptors (uplands vs wetlands) • Hazard Quotient = 1 using High Threshold Reference Values (TRVs) • Human health risk • < 10-5 cancer risk or Hazard Quotient = 1 for noncancer risk • Ecological risk generally drives cleanup goals lower than human health risk • Mare Island ambient/background values • Used if higher than calculated ecological or human health risk values 14

  15. Soil Placement in IA-H1 Containment Area 15

  16. IA-H1 Placement Area Cross-Section 16

  17. Soil Transportation Routes 17

  18. Project Schedule • Preparation and review of project documents – May and June 2007 • Public review – July 2007 • Fieldwork (excavation, confirmation sampling, backfill) – August through October 2007 • Demobilization and site restoration – November 2007 • Preparation of project summary report – January 2008 18

  19. TCRA Benefits • Allows for economical and timely disposal • May accelerate site closures by using conservative cleanup criteria • Provides needed fill material for IA-H1 engineered cap • Reduces truck traffic on public streets • Contaminated soil transport on non-public roads only 19

  20. Summary • Contaminated soil from five MI sites is proposed to be excavated and transported to the IA-H1 Containment Area for placement under the engineered cap • Confirmation sampling of excavations will be completed and results accepted prior to backfilling with clean soil • Accelerated timing needed to support the schedule for completion of IA-H1 Containment Area engineered cap 20

More Related