1 / 46

Carbon Sequestration Module VI: CO 2 Sequestration and CH 4 Recovery from Coal

Carbon Sequestration Module VI: CO 2 Sequestration and CH 4 Recovery from Coal . Maurice Dusseault Department of Earth Sciences University of Waterloo. Last 40 slides here are from Iman Mansourine. The Knowledge Needs for CH 4 …. Pashin et al . 2000. …and with CO 2 Sequestration.

jasia
Download Presentation

Carbon Sequestration Module VI: CO 2 Sequestration and CH 4 Recovery from Coal

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Carbon Sequestration Module VI: CO2 Sequestration and CH4 Recovery from Coal Maurice Dusseault Department of Earth Sciences University of Waterloo Last 40 slides here are from Iman Mansourine

  2. The Knowledge Needs for CH4… Pashin et al. 2000

  3. …and with CO2 Sequestration Pashin et al. 2000

  4. Coal Bed Disposition, Black Warrior Basin, Alabama… Pashin et al. 2000

  5. More Geological Issues… Volume, thickness, number of beds, coal nature, ash content of coal, depth, temperature, permeability, … …

  6. Needs for Sequestration in Coal Pashin et al. 2000

  7. CO2… Proximity Infrastructure Transportation Formations Gas seals Regulatory … Pashin et al. 2000

  8. Enhanced Coalbed Methane Recovery Iman Mansourine November 18th,2003

  9. Introduction • Coalbed methane is the natural gas that is both generated and • stored in coal seams • Coal is the most abundant energy source in the world, and it is a • major source of hydrocarbons particularly gas • - Methane represent more than 90-95% of the gas volume • Coalbed methane has become a significant component of U.S. • natural gas supplies, 7% of total US natural gas production • The injection of CO2 in coalbeds is the most attractive option: • the CO2 is stored and at the same time the recovery of coalbed • methane is enhanced

  10. Principal points of the presentation: • Coalbeds reservoirs characteristics • - Geologic sequestration of CO2 in coalbed reservoirs

  11. Coalbed reservoirs characteristics

  12. Coalbed Reservoir GasContent • Gas Storage Mechanisms • Free gas within natural fractures • Dissolved gas in water within natural fractures • Adsorbed gas within the coal matrix Total gas Volume Free Gas Volume Dissolved Gas Volume + Adsorbed Gas Volume + = Typically > 95%

  13. Characteristics of Coalbed reservoirs • Coalbed are characterized by their dual porosity: • Primary porosity: micropores • Secondary porosity: macropores ( fractures) Source: Van Der Meer

  14. Coal flow mechanisms Source: Law

  15. Characteristics of Coalbed reservoirs • The coalbed porosity and permeability changes as • reservoir pressure is lowered and gas production occurs. • The permeability of coal vary in two basic ways: • 1- Phase-relative permeability effects • 2- Change in the effective stress within the seams • Coalbeds can hold 2-3 times as much gas as conventional • sandstone reservoirs. Source: ARI, 2002

  16. Gas recovery conventional vs. coalbeds Source: ARI 2002

  17. Productive stages of a coalbed methane well Source: ARI 2000

  18. Characteristics of natural gas in coal • - The natural gas found in coal is "sweet" not "sour" as it does not • contain hydrogen sulphide • - It is generally pure methane with small amounts of carbon dioxide • and nitrogen • It is of near-pipeline quality when produced and requires • minimal processing; and, • - It is generally produced at lower pressures than conventional • natural gas.

  19. Geologic sequestration of CO2 in coalbeds

  20. Why? • Coals have the ability to physically adsorb large volume • of CO2 in a highly concentrated state • Coals are frequently located near large point sources • of CO2 emissions • The injection of CO2 into coal seams enhances the • commercial methane recovery process

  21. Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions Using Enhanced Coalbed Methane (ECBM) Source: Gunter, 1998

  22. Reservoir mechanisms Gas Sorption Isotherm Source: ARI,2000

  23. Reservoir mechanisms Coalbed Adsorption Phenomenon Source: Reeves

  24. Reservoir mechanisms Source: Reeves

  25. Reservoir mechanisms Source: Reeves

  26. CO2 sources Three CO2 sources may be used within CO2-ECBM recovery Operations: 1- Natural: High pressure CO2 from underground reservoirs is likely to be the lowest cost source 2- Potential industrial CO2 sources including gas-fired plants and other large industrial plants 3- Anthropogenic sources that currently are being vented to the atmosphere

  27. Effects Coal Properties and Operational Parameters ( SPE 78691) • Purpose: Determine which operational parameters are • important to adjust for coals with different physical properties • in order to maximize the amount of CO2 remaining in coalseams • How? Use of PSU-COALCOMP, a dual-porosity coalbed • methane simulator, to model primary and secondary production • of methane from coal, for a variety of coal properties and • operational parameters

  28. Effects Coal Properties and Operational Parameters ( SPE 78691) • Three properties affect the performance of the sequestration • process: • The sweep efficiency: well geometry • The reservoir pressure level • The degree of departure from chemical equilibrium between the • gasses and the coal: the sorption time constant

  29. Effects Coal Properties and Operational Parameters ( SPE 78691) Results • For short time constants: as injection pressure is increased CO2 sequestrated and methane produced both increase, regardless to the size of the injection wells • For large time constants: • - Increasing injection pressure in the longer injectors decreases • performance • - For short injectors: increasing injection pressure continues to • improve performance • The dependence of CO2 sequestrated on injector length is • minimal for the higher injection pressures

  30. Worldwide ECBM (Sequestration) Projects Source: ARI 2002

  31. Global Assessment of CO2-ECBM/ Sequestration Resources/Capacity Source: ARI 1998

  32. The potential for technically-recoverable CBM Source: ARI

  33. Detailed Examination of US CO2-ECBM/Sequestration Potential Source: DOE/ARI study (2003)

  34. Largest Pilots to Date: San Juan Basin • The world’s first experimental pure CO2-ECBM recovery pilot • The second field demonstration site Source: SPE 48881 Location of CO2/N2 pilots, San Juan Basin

  35. Allison Unit Well Pattern • 4 CO2-injection wells. • 9 methane production • wells. Source: SPE 48881

  36. Allison unit : CO2 injection • - The Allison pilot utilizes approximately 3 MMcfd of naturally • occurring CO2 produced from at McElmo Dome across the • San Juan basin • Bottom Hole pressure of about 1100 psi, safely below the • the formation fracture gradient • High purity (99%) • - Essentially dry

  37. Allison Unit Production Source: ARI, 2003

  38. Comparison of Numerical Simulators for Greenhouse Gas Storage in Coalbeds (Law et al.) • To model CBM production processes, many features have to be • taken into account: • Dual porosity nature of coalbeds • Darcy flows of gas and water in the natural fracture system • Diffusion of a single gas component at the coal surface • Coal matrix shrinkage due to gas desorption

  39. Comparison of Numerical Simulators for Greenhouse Gas Storage in Coalbeds (Law etal.) • Five numerical simulators are being compared for their capability • to model CO2 storage project: • Stars, Computer modeling group • GEM, Computer modeling group • Eclipse, Schlumberger Geoquest • GCOMP, BP-Amoco • SIMED II, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research • Organization • Only Stars and GCOMP are conventional oil and gas simulators

  40. Comparison of Numerical Simulators for Greenhouse Gas Storage in Coalbeds (Law et al.) • The comparison is based on field test data of coalbed reservoir • in Alberta, Canada • Description of Test Problem Sets: • - A single well test with pure CO2 injection • - CO2 injection/CBM production in an inverted five-spot • pattern

  41. Comparison of Numerical Simulators for Greenhouse Gas Storage in Coalbeds (Law et al.) Problem set 1: Single well CO2 injection test • - Cylindrical (r--z) grid system: • 29 x 1 x 1 • Operating conditions: • 15-day CO2 injection period • 45-day shut-in period, pressure falloff • 60-day production period • 62.5-day shut-in period, pressure build up

  42. Comparison of Numerical Simulators for Greenhouse Gas Storage in Coalbeds (Law et al.) Problem set 2: 5-Spot CO2 injection/ CH4 production process Rectangular (x-y-z) grid system: 11 x 11 x 1 Operating conditions 182.5-day injection rate 182.5-day production rate

  43. Comparison of Numerical Simulators for Greenhouse Gas Storage in Coalbeds (Law et al.)

  44. Comparison of Numerical Simulators for Greenhouse Gas Storage in Coalbeds (Law et al.)

  45. The benefits of ECBM • Sequestration of CO2 in coal is a promising market-based environmental solution that can reduce greenhouse gas emissions while increasing coalbed methane recovery • Increase in total reserves • Recovered methane can be used as fuel for electricity and hydrogen generation

  46. The benefits of ECBM • Alternatively, the record gas can be sold for profit, re-affirming coal as the fuel of choice for power plants • Reduction of emitted CO2, a contributor to global warming and long-term climate instability • The greatest impact of CBM may be in countries such as Australia, China and India where coal is the primary energy source and conventional natural gas are small

More Related