230 likes | 385 Views
E N D
1. Concept to Construction:Asset Management In Project DesignHighline Water District Matthew J. Maring, P.E.
AWWA PNWS Conference May 1, 2008
2. Initial Project Design Concept Transmission Capacity Improvements
4600’ 16” Diameter Mains
Dead-End Main Looping Improvements
6500’ 8” Diameter Mains
New Pressure Zone Creation
7 PRVs and 12 Isolation Valves
$4.7M Total Estimated Capital Cost
3. Asset Management Project Approach Asset Management Predesign Review
Business Case Evaluation
Hydraulic Modeling Analysis
Alternative Design Approaches
Identify, Optimize, Assess, Compare
Identify Preferred Design Solutions
Detailed Design
Construction
4. Business Case Evaluation Process Form Expert Team – Highline and BC Staff
Problem Definition
Level of Service Definition
Data Collection, Problem Characterization
Alternative Development Brainstorming
Alternative Performance Evaluations
Hydraulic Modeling Analysis
Alternative Performance, Cost, and Risk Comparison
Preferred Solutions ? Detailed Design
5. Business Case Difference Lifecycle Cost – A dollar is a dollar
Capital, O&M, R&R, Risk Costs
Triple Bottom Line Lifecycle Costing
Financial
Community/Social
Environmental
Preferred Solution = Lowest Lifecycle Cost that Meets Level of Service
Decisions
Justified, Documented, Repeatable
Publically Defensible and Transparent
6. Problem Definition Problem 1: Transmission Capacity
Low Pressures
Limited Fire Flow
Problem 2: Dead-End Mains
Water Circulation and Turn Over
Low Pressures
Limited Fire Flow
Problem 3: High Pressure Areas
Frequent Main Breaks
7. Level of Service Definition Peak Hour Demand Pressures > 30-40 psi
Max Day Demand + Fire Flow > 20 psi
Dead-End Mains
Address Pressures and Fire Flows
Correct where Financially Preferable
High Pressures and Main Breaks
Distribution Leakage Standards
Correct where Financially Preferable
Goal: Max Static Pressures < 100 psi
8. Data Collection and Problem Characterization Hydraulic Model System Performance
Minimum Pressures, Fire Flows
Water Main Breaks
3 to 4 Times More Frequent in High Pressure Areas
$6K+ Average Cost per Break
Repair Labor, Materials, Equipment
Lost Water, Insurance Claims/Deductibles
Reduce High Pressure Breaks to “Normal” Levels = $18K Annual Savings
Dead-End Main Flushing is “Cheap”
9. Future Model Scenario: Existing System Pressure and Fire Flow Performance
10. High Pressure AreaRaw Main Break Data
11. High Pressure Area Main Break Comparison
12. Main Breaks: High Pressures or Acidic Soils?
13. Alternative Development Problem 1: Low Pressures and Fire Flows
Pipe and Pump Improvements
Various Sizes and Combinations
Problem 2: Dead-End Mains
Looping
Alternating and Continuous
Problem 3: High Pressure Areas
New Pressure Zone
PRV Quantity and Locations
Isolation Valve Quantity and Locations
14. Alternative Performanceand Hydraulic Modeling
15. Alternative Performanceand Hydraulic Modeling
16. Alternative Performance New Zone Area Pressures, Before and After
17. Lifecycle NPV Cost Comparison Lifecycle Net Present Value (NPV) Analysis
Capital (Design, Construction, CM)
O&M, R&R, Risk Costs
Amount Invested Today to Fund All Current and Future Asset Costs
18. Risk Cost Considerations Risk Cost = (Probability) x (Consequence)
Example A: (Annual Number of Main Breaks) x (Average Break Repair Cost)
Example B:(Likelihood of Insurance Claim) x (Insurance Deductible + Staff Costs)
Benefit Cost = (Probability) x (Avoided Consequence)
Example C: (Avoided Number of Main Breaks) x (Average Break Repair Cost)
19. Preferred Solution for Detailed Design Transmission Capacity Improvements
1800’ 12” Diameter Mains
Pump Station Upgrades
Dead-End Main Looping Improvements
2700’ 8” Diameter Mains (Alternating)
New Pressure Zone Creation
3 PRVs Supply 50 psi Pressure Reduction
Existing Valves Provide Zone Separation
20. Preferred Solution Delivers Optimal Performance and Cost Savings
21. Avoided Risk Costs Demonstrate Project Value High Pressure Areas Main Breaks
$0.5M Lifecycle NPV Repair Cost
New Pressure Zone Creation
$0.4M Lifecycle NPV Cost
$0.5M Lifecycle NPV Avoided Repairs
$0.1M Savings Over Status Quo
22. Asset Management Approach Success Business Case Evaluation and Hydraulic Modeling Analysis Approach Results:
Cost Savings
$2.6M Capital Costs = 53%
$2.3M Lifecycle Costs = 45%
Higher Overall Level of Service
Takes Advantage of Existing Assets
Pump Station Upgrades vs. New Water Mains
New Pressure Zone Pays for Itself
$0.4M Lifecycle Cost vs.
$0.5M Avoided Lifecycle Main Break Repair Costs
23. Acknowledgements Highline Water District:
Matt Everett, General Manager
Tom Keown, Engineering and Operations Manager
Mike Becker, Operations Supervisor
Dave Stanley, Field Supervisor
Dan Sleeth, Maintenance Lead
24. Questions?