1 / 4

Operational Energy Current Operations

Operational Energy Current Operations. Fuel Consumption Army Materiel Command. Consumption – Fuel . Geographical Breakout ( MGal ). 586 million gallons in FY13 @ $2.5 Billion. MGal. 639. 630. 610. 589. 554. 502.

jed
Download Presentation

Operational Energy Current Operations

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Operational EnergyCurrent Operations Fuel Consumption Army Materiel Command

  2. Consumption – Fuel Geographical Breakout (MGal) 586 million gallons in FY13 @ $2.5 Billion MGal 639 630 610 589 554 502 FY13 use decreased by 241 MGal compared to FY10; however, costs remain at FY10 levels 359 158 160 142 143 140 145 139 107 99 93 96 83 1.8 2.8 Cost in $B 2.5 3.6 2.7 2.0 3.7 74 67 Worldwide Purchase Forecast (MGal) Requirements are trending downward --- costs remain almost at the FY10 level

  3. Automation of Tactical Fuel Management Fuel Consumption AFG: Mar 2011-Aug 2013 Tracked by TFMD • CURRENT • TFMD (Tactical Fuels Manager Defense) • 25 bases in Afghanistan (from a high of 36) • Sunset current TFMD contract in Sep 2014 • INTERIM • Utilize TFMD or FMD (Fuels Manager Defense), the DLA automated accounting module, to support enduring mission in AFG, as applicable from Oct 2014 - AFAMS fielding • FUTURE • AFAMS (Army Fuel Automated Management System) --- AFAMS Capability Development Document (currently under development by TRADOC (CASCOM) • Compete in FY2017-2021 POM for funding 38% of total Army OEF fuel purchases by volume Top Three Categories Installation Energy (42%) Tactical Vehicles (15%) Army Aviation (14%) Capitalizing on Lessons-Learned with TFMD as we define the requirements for AFAMS

  4. FT-SPK Blends HRJ Blends Alternative Fuels Qualification Supporting the DoD Tri-Service POL Users Group’s efforts to qualify alternative fuels drives Army operational energy in the “Out Years”. • Army is qualifying military specification approved renewable and synthetic fuels, in 50/50 blends, with JP-8. • TARDEC completed ground platforms qualification for HRJ & FT-SPK in FY13. • TARDEC has initiated ATJ qualification for completion by end of FY15. • AMRDEC will complete aviation platforms certification for HRJ & FT-SPK by end of FY14. • AMRDEC will certify ATJ by end of FY15. Future In-Progress Completed Ground Qualified Alternative Fuels Qualification Milestones End of FY15 Ground Qualification / Aviation Certification of Emerging Fuel Alternatives Aviation Platforms Certified to Use ATJ FY16 & Beyond End of FY15 ATJ Qualified for Use in Ground Platforms Aviation Platforms Certified to Use HRJ & FT-SPK End of FY14 30 Sep 2013 HRJ & FT-SPK Qualified for Use in Ground Platforms FY12 Field Demonstrations for Ground Platforms Completed FY11 Alternative Fuels Qualification Start-Up HRJ: Hydro-processed Renewable Jet; FT-SPK: Fischer-Tropsch Synthetic Paraffinic Kerosene; ATJ: Alcohol -to-Jet On-Plan with currently approved alternative fuels; evaluating emerging alternative fuels qualification / certification requirements

More Related