790 likes | 974 Views
VA Training in Evidence-Based Psychotherapies. Background. In recent years, health care policy has incorporated evidence-based practice as a central tenet of health care delivery (Institute of Medicine, 2001)
E N D
VA Training in Evidence-Based Psychotherapies VAPTC EBP Presentation
Background • In recent years, health care policy has incorporated evidence-based practice as a central tenet of health care delivery (Institute of Medicine, 2001) • The VA developed a Mental Health Strategic Plan in response to the President’s New Freedom Commission on Mental Health report (2004) • The Mental Health Strategic Plan calls for the implementation of EBPs at every VAMC in the country VAPTC EBP Presentation
Goals of VA Training in EBPs • To train VA staff from multiple disciplines in evidence-based psychotherapies • To augment psychotherapies already being offered in VA medical centers VAPTC EBP Presentation
VA Dissemination and Trainingin EBPs • Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) for Depression • Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) for Depression • Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT) for PTSD • Prolonged Exposure (PE) for PTSD • Social Skills Training (SST) for severe mental illness (SMI) • Integrative Behavioral Couple Therapy (IBCT) • Family Psychoeducation (FPE) • Behavioral Family Therapy (BFT) • Multi-Family Group Therapy (MFGT) VAPTC EBP Presentation
EBP Presentations for Interns and Postdoctoral Fellows • VA EBP rollout training has been focused on staff • VA Psychology Training Council (VAPTC) developed a workgroup in 2009 to focus on developing EBP didactics for interns and postdoctoral fellows VAPTC EBP Presentation
Goals of these EBP Presentations • To provide a basic working knowledge of each of the rollout EBPs • To provide the foundation for trainees to seek out further training and supervision in the EBPs they intend to implement VAPTC EBP Presentation
Limitations • This presentation will not provide equivalent training to the EBP rollouts • This presentation will not provide the skills to implement the treatment without further training and supervision VAPTC EBP Presentation
Cognitive Processing Therapy CPT slides are adapted from a presentation by Kathleen M. Chard, Ph.D.
SOCIAL COGNITIVE THEORY OF PTSD Beliefs Trauma ≈ 15
ASSIMILATION - PRE-EXISTING POSITIVE BELIEFS It is a just world People can be trusted Beliefs Trauma I am in control I must have done something bad to deserve this ≈ It is my fault STUCK I could have prevented this 16
ASSIMILATION - PRE-EXISTING NEGATIVE BELIEFS Trauma I am a bad person People cannot be trusted I deserved it I knew I shouldn’t have trusted him/her ≈ Beliefs STUCK See, I have no control I have no control over anything 17
OVER-ACCOMMODATION I was unsafe Trauma I was powerless I am in control I have no control at all ≈ Beliefs STUCK The world is completely unsafe The world is safe 18
ACCOMMODATION A bad thing happened to me Trauma I was unsafe I was powerless Good people do bad things Bad things happen to good people RECOVERY Beliefs I have power over many things, but not all things I can take steps to protect myself, but no one is 100% safe 19
IDENTIFYING STUCK POINTS Undoing, (“if only, should have”) guilt or blame about trauma Conclusions, implications of trauma (“never, always, no one”, all re: 5 themes)
RESEARCH ON CPT There have been four randomized clinical trials of CPT and several effectiveness studies. See the manual for the exact references. Randomized Clinical Trials • Rape victims (Resick et al., 2002, JCCP) • Child sexual abuse (Chard, 2005, JCCP) • Veterans (Monson et al., 2006, JCCP) • Rape and assault (Resick et al., 2008, JCCP) 24
CAPS SEVERITY PRE- AND POST-TREATMENT (TREATMENT COMPLETERS)
CHARD (2007): EFFECTIVENESS OF CPT IN VA RESIDENTIAL PROGRAM • 7-week residential program • CPT conducted twice a week in individual and group treatment • 23 other hours of psych. programming • Pre-post data on 154 residents, 122 men and 32 women admitted as cohorts of 12 • Next slides compare this program with the RCT with veterans by Monson et al. (2006) Chard, Unpublished data
CINCINNATI RESIDENTIAL PROGRAM * ** N= 140 77 142 61 139 73
PCL (MADISON) AND CAPS (CINCINNATI) ACROSS ERAS Madison Cincinnati
Some other findings of note… 1. Long-term follow-up of a clinical trial comparing CPT and PE. Patricia A. Resick, Lauren WilliamsRobert Orazem and Cassidy Gutner ISTSS & ABCT, Nov., 2005
LONG TERM FOLLOW-UPS • Follow-up conducted at five+ years post-treatment (M= 6 yrs, range 5-10) • 171 women were in the intent-to-treat sample • We did not locate 25 and 3 were deceased • Of the 143 we located: 17 refused to participate (12%) 2 were located but were not appropriate • We conducted at least the diagnostic interviews on 124 and have complete assessments on 119 • 88% participation rate
CPT AND PE “CROSS-SECTIONAL”(INTENT-TO-TREAT) CPT, N= 83 55 50 41 63 PE, N= 88 55 51 39 64
CPT & PE ITT ON PTSD DIAGNOSIS AT PRE-TREATMENT AND LONG TERM
COGNITIVE PROCESSING THERAPYSESSION BY SESSION Cognitive Processing Therapy Veteran/Military Version Resick, P. A., Monson, C. M., & Chard, K. M. (2008) Produced by VA Office of Mental Health, VA National Center for PTSD/ VA Boston Healthcare System and Cincinnati VA Medical Center
CPT VERSUS CPT-C?FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE THE CHOICE • Patient may have a personal preference • More available research • Account writing and sharing full details might be therapeutic • Patient is wiling to write an account • Patient states he has little or no memory of the event due to avoidance (writing acct may help recover the details) • Time is not a factor • Therapist believes that the patient needs to express avoided emotions. • Patient may have a personal preference • Patient really has no recollection of the event • Patient refuses to write account • Impending redeployment/not enough time for full protocol • Therapist discomfort with written account component • Less overall time available, want more time to develop cognitive skills • Conceptualization of case warrants more cognitive restructuring • Conducting group therapy
A-B-C Sheet Date: ___________ patient #: ______ ACTIVATING EVENT BELIEF CONSEQUENCE A B C“Something happens” “ I tell myself something” “I feel something” Is it reasonable to tell yourself “B” above? _____________________ _________________________________________________________ What can you tell yourself on such occasions in the future? ________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________