1 / 20

Presentation Management-information ESF by Martin de Vries Coordinator Planning & Control

Presentation Management-information ESF by Martin de Vries Coordinator Planning & Control. September 19 th 2006 11:30 – 12:15 h. Organisation Chart. Organisation Chart. Tasks of Planning & Control.

jeff
Download Presentation

Presentation Management-information ESF by Martin de Vries Coordinator Planning & Control

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Presentation Management-information ESFby Martin de VriesCoordinator Planning & Control September 19th 2006 11:30 – 12:15 h

  2. Organisation Chart

  3. Organisation Chart

  4. Tasks of Planning & Control • Planning:1. making a tender (the next year) of every grant executed (including ESF) for each awarding authority (= policy maker)2. making the budget of the agency SZW as a whole for the next year for the owner • Control:3. reporting regularly about the quantitative and qualitative realisation of the grants executed 4. reporting regularly about the financial situation of the agency as a whole5. reporting to Parliament and the press about 3., when asked. 6. give the management of the agency advise on matters of planning & control

  5. Informing the Stakeholders of ESF-3 European Commision European Parliament Dutch society:unions, employers, communities (towns),etc. h. 1-2 times p.year(budget realisation) i. Quarterly deviations (OLAF) Monitoring Committee j. yearly: qualitative k. 3-4 x p.year l. Questions of society / press Ministry of Social Affairs a. tender b. budget Owner (SG) Awarding authority (AM) AGENCYGen.Man. P&C d. month c. month e. Every 4 months c. month f. Weekly – by exception g. Questions of Parliament Minister of Social Affairs Prior to each year Realisation - ex post Council of Ministers Dutch Parliament Realisation – on demand

  6. Informing the Stakeholders of ESF-3Planning – internal (within the Ministry): • Tender for the awarding authority – prior to each year: products (# applications, end reports, handled) x productprice (= labour for each product x integral cost of labour) = estimated income for the agency SZW payable by the awarding authority • Budget of the agency SZW as a whole for the owner – prior to each year: sum of all the grants executed by the agency SZW - total cost of labour, housing, investments and overhead = estimated result of the year for the agency SZW as a whole

  7. Informing the Stakeholders of ESF-3Control – internal: • Information to the management of the agency – monthly: realized income (for every grant executed) = realised # products x price - realized costs (for the agency as a whole) = realized result expectation of income / costs / result at year-end problems encountered with the execution of ESF-3 developments personnel: # employed, % sick-leave, # hours worked (direct/indirect)

  8. Informing the Stakeholders of ESF-3Control - internal: • Information to the awarding authority – monthly: compensation payable = realised # products x price expectation of compensation payable at year-end # applications, end reports in stock to handle / handling time problems encountered with the execution of ESF-3 realisation of the EC-budget for ESF per priority / measurement expectation of realisation of the EC-budget at year-end

  9. Informing the Stakeholders of ESF-3Control - internal: • Information to the owner – every 4 months: realized income - realized costs = realized result expectation of income / costs / result at year-end developments personnel: # employed, % sick-leave, # hours worked

  10. Informing the Stakeholders of ESF-3Control – external: political • Information Council of Ministers – weekly: management-information by exception quantitative / qualitative information about ESF-projects • Informing Dutch Parliament - on demand report of the Minister of Social Affairs / questions asked in Parliamentquantitative / qualitative information about ESF-projects

  11. Informing the Stakeholders of ESF-3Control – external: European Commission • Declaration ESF-budget spent – 1-2 times a year: on-line reporting system of the EC N+2 declaration (see further) • Deviations end report > € 4.000 (individual projects) - each quarter on-line system OLAF-bureau (anti-fraude) • Execution of ESF – year-end / Evaluation (midterm, final, ex-post)  development of ESF granted per priority / measurement # people involved in ESF-project (male-female, age, origin, education) effectiveness of the ESF granted to projects

  12. Informing the Stakeholders of ESF-3Control – external: Dutch society • Monitoring Committee (representatives of EC + society) – 3-4 times a year: ESF granted to projects per priority / measurement developments of the execution of ESF-grants • Questions of the press / organisations within society - on demand transparancy and publicity of governance

  13. N+2 Declaration ESF-budget spent • EC principles of declarations: • N+2 (declaration of year N, before 31th December N+2) • All declarations until the final one end 2008 are provisional • Possible 2 additional declarations every year • Budgets not used in a particular year will be lost • Real costs • Costs must be paid

  14. N+2 Declaration ESF-budget spent

  15. N+2 Declaration ESF-budget spent

  16. N+2 Declaration ESF-budget spent Dutch declarations in the years 2001 – 2006:

  17. N+2 and the various stages during the project life-cycle: A. Subsidy determined (certification by certified auditor):- Taken into the N+2 declaration, without additional activities. B. Project ended, final report in progress by Agentschap:- For N+2 final reports should be blocked in the ESF-system (100%).- Blocking these final reports responsibility of the Manager Operations.- Indications the subsidy will not be determined as requested in the final report ? - consultant performs brief review of the final report (cert./IC).- if necessary: manual correction of expected on the final reports. C. Projectactivities still taking place:- year reports (results and costs of the project in the previous year).- represent real costs already paid; no certification by certified accountant.- regular activities consultants: brief review and blocking report in the ESF-system.

  18. Demonstration ESF-system (ESF Beheer) Using the ESF-system for reporting purposes:  system based on individual projects: insufficient reporting tool - e.g. monthly developments # products - e.g. # male / female participants in ESF-projects  invalid input in the system: insufficient input-controls  information not available in the system: insufficient data-model - e.g. categories applicants

  19. Demonstration ESF-system (ESF Beheer) Tools in the ESF-system regarding N+2 declaration:  Report N+2 declaration Brussel - reviewed - blocked in system Report N+2 declaration Brussel - not reviewed - not blocked yet  Report differences - project level: what’s the position reviewed - what can be gained by reviewing

  20. Demonstration ESF-system (ESF Beheer) Lessons that can be learned from ESF Beheer:  system should contain a flexible reporting tool system should contain sufficient input-controls  before engineering the system a clear data-model is essential

More Related