1 / 12

Some Intricacies in m4Ed4Dev: The Human Development Lab’s Ongoing Experiences from India

Some Intricacies in m4Ed4Dev: The Human Development Lab’s Ongoing Experiences from India. Matthew Kam , PhD Assistant Professor Carnegie Mellon University. August 18, 2011 USAID 1 st Annual Mobiles 4 Education 4 Development Symposium. Needs and Problem Statement.

jeff
Download Presentation

Some Intricacies in m4Ed4Dev: The Human Development Lab’s Ongoing Experiences from India

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Some Intricacies in m4Ed4Dev:The Human Development Lab’s Ongoing Experiences from India Matthew Kam, PhD Assistant Professor Carnegie Mellon University August 18, 2011 USAID 1st Annual Mobiles 4 Education 4 Development Symposium

  2. Needs and Problem Statement • Fluency in “power language”e.g. English • Public schools in developingregions (e.g. India) are not succeeding • 101 million primary school-age children do not attend school • 36 million in South-Asia • 39 million in Sub-Saharan Africa

  3. Major Milestones • 2004-07: exploratory studies +formative testing • 2008: semester-length pilot (after-school program) • 2009: semester-length pilot (everyday, rural settings) • 2010: design + develop second generation of games • 2011: semester-length pilot with 254 children in 4 low-fee private schools

  4. Traditional Village Games[in ACM CHI 2009 – Best Paper Honorable Mention] • How are traditional Indian village games different from existing Western videogames? • Compared game elements against 296 game design patterns documented in Bjork and Holopainen 2005

  5. Learning Benefits: Post-Test Gains • Low-gains learners (n=15)> high-gains learners (n=9) • Significant post-test gains (n=24, p = 0.007)

  6. Learning Benefits: Vocab Coverage • Average participant covered 46 new words over 16 weeks of unsupervised usage of cellphones • At this rate, each participant is expected to learn 150 new words in a calendar year • Benchmark is 500 words in “First World” learning conditions

  7. Electricity was Major Bottleneck • Despite electricity challenges, participants were able to keep cellphones charged for mobile learning • 2 hours, 23 min per week (on average) Electricity generatorat home Reliable power outlets at home Unreliable power outlets at home

  8. Locations of Cellphone Use • Unexpectedly, most learning via cellphones occurred at home (vs. outdoors) • Home is cooler than outdoors due to summer heat • Participants self-reported taking cellphones outdoor prior to summer • Concern about loss of phone * % of total time spent at a particular location

  9. Gender and Caste Equity Issues[in ACM CHI 2010 – Best Paper Honorable Mention] • 6 swollen batteries

  10. Ongoing R&D • Extend bridge curriculum beyond ½ academic year • Targets rural children, who lag three years behind urban, middle-class counterparts • Differs from existing commercial software for industrialized world children; targets foundational knowledge that good schools would have provided • Pilot with >254 children in 4 low-fee private schools to co-evolve sustainable m4Ed4Dev educational models • Possibilities for teacher training

  11. Acknowledgements • Carnegie Mellon University (USA) – Rafae Aziz, Ryan Baker, Rachita Chandra, Manoj Dayaram, Maxine Eskenazi, Ayan Kishore, Alex Kowalski, Anuj Kumar, Derek Lomas, Gino Mancuso, Andrew Ngan, Pooja Reddy, Daniel Rhim, Geeta Shroff, Kyle Sondrock, Raja Sooriamurthi, Le Wei, Sue-mei Wu • Chinese Academy of Sciences (China) – Lv Fei, Tian Feng , Ben Rachbach • DAIICT, IIT, IIIT, NSIT (India) – Aishvarya Agarwal, Lalit Agarwal, Shilpan Bhagat, Malav Bhavsar, Anshul Chaurasia, Akash Gangil, Denny George, Aakriti Gupta, Chetan Gupta, Mayank Gupta, Amol Jain, Ashwin Jain, Rachit Jain, Siddharth Kothari, Kaustav Kundu, Siddhartha Lal, Manish Lohani, Mohit Maheshwari, Nikhil Marathe, Akhil Mathur, Kishan Patel, Vipul Raheja, Dhruv Shah, Yash Soni, Surendra Survi, Satyajit Swain, Vivek Tripathi, Pallav Vyas • University of Berkeley (USA) – Ruth Alexander, Lauren Bailey, Eric Brewer, John Canny, Deepti Chittamuru, Jane Chiu, Varun Devanathan, Asya Grigorieva, Dimas Guardado, Christopher Hom, Glynda Hull, Anjali Koppal, Maksim Lirov, Aaron McKee, Gary Miguel, David Nguyen, Anand Raghavan, Divya Ramachandran, Priyanka Reddy, Vijay Rudraraju, Monish Subherwal, Simon Tan, Anuj Tewari, Jingtao Wang • University of Nairobi (Kenya) – Tonny Omwansa • Pilot team (India) – Mehnaaz Abidi, Shabnam Aggarwal, Aman Anand, Siddharth Bhagwani, Jatin Chaudhary, Sonal Gupta, Shirley Jain, Alok Prakash, Neelima Purwar, Rolly Seth, Gautam Singh, Kartikey Singh, Kavish Sinha, Indrani Vedula

  12. Contact Info Matthew Kam, PhD Assistant Professor Carnegie Mellon University Human-Computer Interaction Institute Email: mattkam@cs.cmu.edu Homepage: http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~mattkam 12

More Related