50 likes | 66 Views
This article explores the importance of competition reforms for development in Africa, discussing topics such as market failures, trade protection, industrial strategies, competition law and policy, and the role of the state. It also examines the impact of corruption, inefficiency, and poor governance on development, and highlights the need for new rules and the balance between state and market. The article concludes by examining macro and micro-level performance and the importance of visible outcomes and impactful reforms.
E N D
Relevance of Competition Reforms for Development in Africa David Lewis Gordon Institute of Business Science
Underdeveloped Markets • Development economics emphasised market failures • Infant industries/trade protection • State owned enterprises • National industrial strategies • Suppression of agricultural markets • Competition law and policy • 1st World (USA) preoccupation • 1st World ‘luxury’ • How to ‘substitute’ for markets, not promote markets
Development Model Reconsidered • Corruption and inefficiency • Poor governance • Low development returns • Collapse of Berlin Wall GAVE RISE TO • Domestic market liberalisation - privatisation/ deregulation • International trade liberalisation – reduced tariff barriers/exports • Democratic governance • New ‘rules of game’ required • But still strong support for state – Asian NIC’s, China • CLP sometimes imposed; sometimes embraced
Relevance of Competition Reforms MACRO PERFORMANCE • Strong global growth performance • But growing in-country and between-country inequality • Many major setbacks – financial and economic crises • And important ‘exceptions’ – eg. access to agricultural markets • Which limit reforms – Doha Round BUT MARKETS RULE, THOUGH CONTINUED REGARD FOR STRONG STATE ROLE, SO... • Relevance of CP axiomatic – boundaries between state and market, regulation • Relevance of CL axiomatic – maintain open markets in face of economically strengthened elites
Micro Performance • Usually very difficult to measure micro outcomes • But constituency for CLP depends on visible outcomes – ‘it’s context, stupid’ • Select reforms and enforcement that are winnable and impactful • Telecommunications – powerful new technologies, great diffusion • Basic commodities – pro-poor • Local markets – pro-poor • Public procurement – pro-taxpayer and treasury • Design imaginative, impactful remedies • Don’t only focus on enforcement • Mergers – reputation for strength and competence • Advocacy • Public anti-competitive conduct • Performance of regulators and SOEs