50 likes | 114 Views
Relevance of Competition Reforms for Development in Africa. David Lewis Gordon Institute of Business Science. Underdeveloped Markets. Development economics emphasised market failures Infant industries/trade protection State owned enterprises National industrial strategies
E N D
Relevance of Competition Reforms for Development in Africa David Lewis Gordon Institute of Business Science
Underdeveloped Markets • Development economics emphasised market failures • Infant industries/trade protection • State owned enterprises • National industrial strategies • Suppression of agricultural markets • Competition law and policy • 1st World (USA) preoccupation • 1st World ‘luxury’ • How to ‘substitute’ for markets, not promote markets
Development Model Reconsidered • Corruption and inefficiency • Poor governance • Low development returns • Collapse of Berlin Wall GAVE RISE TO • Domestic market liberalisation - privatisation/ deregulation • International trade liberalisation – reduced tariff barriers/exports • Democratic governance • New ‘rules of game’ required • But still strong support for state – Asian NIC’s, China • CLP sometimes imposed; sometimes embraced
Relevance of Competition Reforms MACRO PERFORMANCE • Strong global growth performance • But growing in-country and between-country inequality • Many major setbacks – financial and economic crises • And important ‘exceptions’ – eg. access to agricultural markets • Which limit reforms – Doha Round BUT MARKETS RULE, THOUGH CONTINUED REGARD FOR STRONG STATE ROLE, SO... • Relevance of CP axiomatic – boundaries between state and market, regulation • Relevance of CL axiomatic – maintain open markets in face of economically strengthened elites
Micro Performance • Usually very difficult to measure micro outcomes • But constituency for CLP depends on visible outcomes – ‘it’s context, stupid’ • Select reforms and enforcement that are winnable and impactful • Telecommunications – powerful new technologies, great diffusion • Basic commodities – pro-poor • Local markets – pro-poor • Public procurement – pro-taxpayer and treasury • Design imaginative, impactful remedies • Don’t only focus on enforcement • Mergers – reputation for strength and competence • Advocacy • Public anti-competitive conduct • Performance of regulators and SOEs