1 / 44

The volatile content of the Earth Mantle; highlights, progress and future directions

The volatile content of the Earth Mantle; highlights, progress and future directions. Alberto Saal 1 , Erik Hauri 2 , Greg Hirth 1 , Marc Parmentier 1 , Don Forsyth 1 1. Dept. of Geological Sciences, Brown University 2. Dept. of Terrestrial Magnetism, Carnegie Institution of Washington.

jenette-bailey
Download Presentation

The volatile content of the Earth Mantle; highlights, progress and future directions

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The volatile content of the Earth Mantle; highlights, progress and future directions Alberto Saal1, Erik Hauri2, Greg Hirth1, Marc Parmentier1, Don Forsyth1 1. Dept. of Geological Sciences, Brown University 2. Dept. of Terrestrial Magnetism, Carnegie Institution of Washington Acknowledgement Rajdeep Dasgupta, Marc Hirschmann, Katie Kelly, Alison Shaw, Terry Plank, Liz Cottrell, Paul Asimow, Hans Keppler, Shun-Ichiro Karato, Cyril Aubaud

  2. Volatiles have significant effect on the mantle solidus, the composition and physical properties of melt, magma crystallization and differentiation, style of magma eruption, generation of mantle heterogeneity, seismic and electrical properties of minerals, rheology of the mantle Possible Loci of Hydrous Melting in the Mantle Hirschmann CIDER 2009

  3. Highlights Technical Aspects: Cameca 6F: Low detection limits C 1ppm H2O 2 ppm; F 0.1 ppm; S 0.3 ppm; Cl 0.03 ppm High spatial resolution 10-20µm Cameca NanoSims: Low detection limits C 0.13 ppm H2O 0.4 ppm; F 0.1 ppm; S 0.3 ppm; Cl 0.03 ppm High spatial resolution 4-20µm Concentrations of C, H2O, F, S, Cl collected together Hauri et al., unpublished; 2002; 2006 Koga et al., 2003; Aubaud et al., 2004

  4. 50 45 40 35 30 F ppm 25 20 15 10 5 0 0 20 40 60 80 H2O ppm Water in samples from the Moon

  5. Highlights Experimental Work: • Solubility of volatiles in NAM. • Kohlstedt et al. (1996);Kawamoto et al. (1995); Bolfan-Casanova et al. (2000); Smyth et al. (2003); Mierdel K, Keppler H (2004); Komabayashi et al. (2005); Rauch & Keppler (2002); Smyth et al (2005); Mierdel et al. (2007); Jacobsen (2005). • Partitioning of volatiles between NAM and melt. • Koga et al., (2003); Aubaud et al., (2004); (2008); Hauri et al., (2006), Tenner, et al (2009); O'Leary et al. (2009); Hirschmann (2006). • The influence of volatiles (water) on mantle wedge melting. • Grove et al., (2006); Kushiro et al., (1968); Mysen & Boettcher (1975). • Effect of volatiles on rheology, seismic anisotropy and electrical conductivity as a way to map water content from geophysical observations.Karato (2001); Mei &Kohlstedt (2000); Hirth & Kohlstedt (2003); Jacobsen (2006) • Trace element partitioning between slab fluids and minerals. • Green & Adam, (2007); Kessel et al. (2004); (2005); Schmidt et al. (2004); Manning (2004); Johnson and Plank (1999); Keppler (1996). • Carbonated peridotite/eclogite solidus. Understanding the importance of CO2 flux on the onset of silicate melting and deep carbonatite generation. • Dasgupta et al., (2004); (2005); (2006); (2007a); (2007b); Dasgupta and Hirschmann (2007)

  6. Highlights Observations and Modeling: • Volatiles in submarine glasses. • Dixon et al. (2002); Worman et al. (2006); Cartigny et al (2008); Stroncik& Haase(2004); many others • Volatiles in melt inclusions. • Wallace (2005); Saal et al. (2002); Portnyagin et al.(2009);Metrich and Wallace (2008); many others • Water in pyroxenes. • Wade et al. (2008) • How water drive melting in the mantle. • Kelley et al. (2006), Langmuir et al (2006);Portnyagin et al.(2009); Asimow & Langmuir (2004); Plank et al. (2009); Hirschman (2006). • Correlation pre-eruptive H2O contents with melt oxidation state. • Kelley & Cottrell (2009) • Hydrogen isotope fractionations in melt inclusions from arc lavas to OIB. • Shaw et al., (2008); Hauri (2002)

  7. Progress Report: What is the Asthenosphere? Priestley McKenzie, 2006 Ritsema: S40FR: 125 Km

  8. The unique physical properties of the Asthenosphere have been attributed to either mineral properties at relevant temperature, pressure, and water content or to the presence of a low melt fraction. • We rely on the composition of the asthenosphere to understand the parameters controlling the observed physical properties of this mechanically weak region of the upper mantle. • We resort to the geochemical studies of Mid-Ocean Ridge Basalts (MORB) to unravel the composition of the Asthenosphere. • It is important to determine to what extent the geochemical variations in axial MORB do represent a homogeneous mantle composition and variations in the physical conditions of magma generation and transport; or alternatively, they are inherited from mixing processes during the aggregation of melts originated from an heterogeneous mantle. • Lavas from intra-transform faults and seamounts share a common mantle source with axial MORB, they represent smaller melt volumes tapped locally from areas lacking steady-state magma chambers and along-axis transport. Thus, they are melts experiencing relatively less mixing and differentiation, and their compositions provide insight into the heterogeneity of the Asthenosphere.

  9. Axial, seamount and intra-transform basalts Seamounts Ridge axis Intra-transform

  10. Enriched Normal Depleted Trace element composition normalized to Primitive Mantle Trace Elements/PM Normalization values from McDonough and Sun 1995

  11. Enriched Normal Depleted Significant fractionation of very incompatible elements

  12. Enriched Normal Depleted Essentially a two component Asthenosphere

  13. Mixing or residence time of the enriched component in the upper mantle

  14. Volatiles: Fluorine Workman et al., 2006

  15. Enriched Normal Depleted Volatiles: Fluorine

  16. Enriched Normal Depleted Volatiles: Chlorine Stoncik & Haase (2004)

  17. 0 . 1 seawater 0 . 0 9 0 . 0 8 0 . 0 7 0 . 0 6 Cl/K 0 . 0 5 Mantle source 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 3 0 . 0 2 0 . 0 1 0 1 5 0 2 5 0 3 5 0 4 5 0 H O / C e 2 Cl-Contamination and Water Mantle values for OIB Stoncik and Haase (2004)

  18. Enriched Normal Depleted Volatiles: Water

  19. Volatiles: Carbon dioxide

  20. Cartigny et al. 2008 10000 CO2/Nb ~600 Iceland NVZ 1000 CO2 [ppm] 100 10 0.1 1 10 100 Nb [ppm] . Enriched ? CO2/Nb ~300 Depleted Siqueiros MI MORB Saal et al. 2002

  21. Enriched Normal Depleted Volatiles: Carbon dioxide

  22. 300 CO2= 22(±14) + Cl x 57(±8)) 250 200 CO2 150 100 Cl assimilation of Host Glasses 50 Cl 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 10000 Host Glasses Melt Inclusions MORB CO2 Degassing CO2 1000 100 Cl assimilation of Host Glasses 1 10 100 1000 Cl Using average Cl content of 150 ppm for Enriched Cl uncontaminated lava we get 8600±1000 CO2 Using the average Nb content of 15 ppm for the Enriched Cl uncontamina-ted lava, we get a CO2/Nb of 570±70 consistent with the CO2/Nb for the Enriched mantle by Cartigny et al., (2008) Thus, given the Nb content of a melt we can use the CO2-Nb-Cl relationship to estimate the primitive CO2 and Cl contents for degassed and chlorine-contaminated basalt magmas, and hence constrain degassing and contamination histories

  23. O 2 /H 2 CO Volatiles: CO2/H2O 1.90 1.70 1.50 1.30 Enriched 1.10 0.90 0.70 MORB 10% enriched + 90% depleted 0.50 0.30 Depleted 0.10 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 Nb/La

  24. Progress Report Conclusions: The new data on intra-transform and seamount lavas from the EPR, indicate the presence of a two mantle component forming the Asthenosphere: An incompatible trace element and volatile enriched mantle immersed in a very depleted mantle, which is significantly more depleted than the estimated average MORB source. Such heterogeneity should be considered when interpreting the physical properties of the Asthenosphere Approximate concentrations Depleted Mantle H2O 50 ppm; CO2 20 ppm; Cl 1 ppm; F 7 ppm Enriched Mantle H2O 500 ppm; CO2 420 ppm; Cl 10 ppm; F 18 ppm Total Mantle H2O 366 ppm; CO2 301 ppm; Cl 7 ppm; F 15 ppm

  25. Volatile Budget! The key points are: (a) The H/C ratio of the bulk silicate Earth is superchondritic, owing chiefly to the high H/C ratio of the exosphere. (b) the H/C ratio of the mantle is lower than that of the exosphere, which requires significant H/C fractionation during ingassing or outgassing at some point in Earth history. Hirschmann and Dasgupta (2009)

  26. Future work: • Hydrogen solubility and the influence of hydrogen on physical properties of lower mantle minerals. • Constraining the influence of mixed volatiles in the properties of planetary cores melting, crystallization, and geochemical • Volatile heterogeneity in the Earth's mantle, are they coupled to major element? • Understanding effects of mixed volatiles on mantle melting, • What are the solidus temperatures of peridotite at low water fugacity • S and Cl isotopes • The effect of redox states on volatile-present melting • Behavior of volatiles during early Earth differentiation accretion, giant impact, and core-mantle segregation • Damp/carbonated mantle solidus at high pressure • What are the properties of fluids in subduction zones? (e.g., mineral solubilities). • Partitioning of noble gases during melting at all pressures. • Mass balance: is the mantle outgassing or ingassing.

  27. 2000 K m = 2x10-3 ME m = 2x10-2 ME Pahlevan and Stevenson (2007) suggested that the proto-Earth and proto-lunar disk would have diffusively equilibrated after the giant impact, and that the volatile depletion of the Moon may be explained by hydrodynamic escape driven by an outflow of hydrous materials previously accreted to the Earth.

  28. Volatile-rich-meteorite bombardment during the lunar magma ocean Ryder, 2002 Many models have proposed significant accretion of material during and after the LMO Our results suggest that either hydrodynamic escape was not complete or a significant amount of water was accreted to the Earth-Moon system very soon after the giant impact.

  29. Marty, 2008

  30. Earth’s zircons as old as 4,325 Ma with oxygen isotopes of 6.5 ‰ provide evidence for the presence of liquid water near Earth’s surface within ~230 Ma of Earth’s accretion. This observation strongly suggests that either the Earth had significant amounts of water before the giant impact, or the material accreted to the Earth and Moon within a narrow time window after the giant impact but before 4.3 Ga was rich in volatiles Valley et al., 2002; Cavosie et al., 2005

  31. Future Work funded by the LASER To characterize the volatile contents of the different Lunar volcanic glasses compositional groups defined by Delano (1986). Specially those showing different proportion of KREEP component. To determine the volatile contents in lunar Mare basalts melt inclusions and pyroxenes melt inclusions pyroxenes

  32. MELT INCLUSION 196 µ Why are melt inclusions important to the study of volatiles in magmatic systems? They have a more primitive (pre-eruptive) volatile content than glasses, before shallow level degassing or contamination occurred

  33. Normalized Frequency (%) Enriched Normal Depleted Histogram of Nd isotopic ratios in basalts Warren et al., 2008

  34. The problem with the calculation of CO2 a) Difference of 0.1 gr/cm3 in density of melt used gives a difference of 450 ppm CO2. b) Difference in the melt-glass transition temperature used, the calculated CO2 content will significantly vary ~ 1000 ppm CO2 for each 100oC difference! (e.g., 1000 rather than 700 oC will produce a calculated CO2 content of 10000 ppm and 13000 respectively) c) Difference of 1% vesicularity will produce a difference of 600 ppm CO2 d) Considers not bubble accumulation! e) d13C fractionation (D) between measured gas and dissolved carbon vary widely, between 2 and 8 per mil. Such variations cannot be modeled neither by equilibrium nor Rayleigh fractionation. If this is the case, what evidence do we have that the carbon content in the popping rocks is the primordial content?

  35. H2O-CO2 saturation model

  36. The generation of the enriched MORB require two-stage-melting: an ancient low degree melting (~ 1%) that metasomatise the deplete mantle, which later undergoes large extent of melting (~6-10%) Halliday et al., (1995); Niu and O’Hara (2003) Phipps-Morgan and Morgan (1999) Donnelly et al., (2004)

  37. Dasgupta and Hirschmann 2006

  38. Dry 0.4% H2O Olivine + Aug 0.75% H2O Enriched + Plag Normal Depleted Major elements suggest peridotitic sources for both components

  39. Fractionation Corrections and Water Content

  40. Dasgupta and Hirschmann 2007

  41. Dasgupta et al 2009

More Related