180 likes | 190 Views
Explore the ENSO behavior in the CCSM3 model by comparing different versions and analyzing SST and atmospheric teleconnections.
E N D
ENSO in CCSM3 Clara Deser and Adam Phillips (with thanks to Bob Tomas and Mark Stevens) Climate Variability Working Group Meeting, CCSM Workshop, Santa Fe NM, July 9 2004
ENSO in CCSM3 SST and Atmospheric Teleconnections • Compare T42 and T85 versions of CCSM3 (multi-century control integrations) • Compare CCSM3 with CCSM2 (T42 control integrations) • Compare CCSM3 T85 control with CAM3 T85 AMIP integration, 1950-2000
SST: Mean and Variance CSM2 Nino3.4 CSM3 T42 CSM3 T85 OBS
SST Nino3.4 Index: Observed vs. CCSM3 (T42) Observed Model
Power Spectrum of SST Nino3.4 Index T42 CSM3 T42 CSM2 OBS T85 CSM3
Timing of ENSO Events Seasonal Cycle of ENSO Amplitude
Warm – Cold ENSO CompositesDecember-FebruarySea Surface TemperaturePrecipitationSea Level Pressure
SST Precipitation T42 similar 99% sig. Warm - Cold ENSO Composites (DJF)
1979-2000 Warm - Cold ENSO Composites (DJF) CAM3 forced with observed SST
ENSO in CCSM3 Summary • Good timing, amplitude and spatial pattern of SST anomalies in CCSM3, but model ENSO events are too biennial compared to nature • Precipitation response is reasonable, although compensating anomalies are too confined meridionally (e.g., lack of a signal in the SPCZ, maritime continent and Indian Ocean regions) • SLP response over the North Pacific in boreal winter is excellent in T85 version, too weak in T42 version