1 / 25

Agro-forestry & crop combination options

Agro-forestry & crop combination options. Dr Calliope Panoutsou Biomass Department CRES. Contents. Aim S trengths, W eaknesses, O pportunities & T hreats Biomass resources available in south EU Agro- biomass Forest biomass Current RTD projects Future options Future RTD needs

jenna
Download Presentation

Agro-forestry & crop combination options

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Agro-forestry & crop combination options Dr Calliope Panoutsou Biomass Department CRES

  2. Contents • Aim • Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities & Threats • Biomass resources available in south EU • Agro- biomass • Forest biomass • Current RTD projects • Future options • Future RTD needs • Challenges • Recommendations- Conclusions

  3. Aim • Collecting information on experiences gained with and possibilities for dedicated bioenergy crop combinations as well as • agro-forestry options which promise to combine high yields with relatively low environmental impacts.

  4. Strengths • Climate favors several resource options • Residual resources with low moisture • Energy crops with high yielding potential • Energy crops can be complementary to current activities in time and resources (human & machinery) • Uncertain policy framework (new CAP) leads farmers to seek new cropping options • Political pressure on RES & bioenergy (Biomass Action Plan) • Emissions & Biofuels Directives (2003/87/EC, 2003/30/EC) could be a means for high biomass demand

  5. Weaknesses • Semi-arid conditions require irrigation • Landscape associated risks (erosion, water runoff, desertification levels) • Small farming size compared with central, northern EU member states • Lack of “fully” mechanized agriculture • RTD fragmented, reflecting great diversity of crops, supply routes and end uses. • Difficult forest management, fire risks, lack of road infrastructure, etc. • Need to evaluate the whole chain; an integrated approach to deliver quality, availability and cost targets and achieve competitiveness.

  6. Opportunities • Identify dedicated low impact high yielding cropping systems suitable for med regions • Create supply chains combining residual forms and energy crops. • Establish fuel supply chains which will act as links among biomass producers & users • Evaluate resource options both for industrial & with waste fractions (e.g. energy properties (biorefinery supplies) • Combine agro- forestry biomass with waste streams (demolition wood, packaging paper, etc.) • Create communication channels & synergies with the farming & forestry community

  7. Threats • Traditional “food” agriculture systems not aware of energy- industry markets • Variety of feedstocks with different physical- chemical properties • Lack of specified agricultural machinery for certain energy crops • Low knowledge levels in the farming & forestry communities • Complexity of issues & associated groups involved require prior to start- up planning and strong day-to-day coordination

  8. Biomass energy in south EU • High growth rate in wind energy but slow expansion of biomass singled out as key reason for failure to reach targets. • Modest progress in southern countries. • Limited data for energy crops: RTD small scale fields cannot give answers for commercial scale up • Lack of forest management practices dedicated to energy in most south states

  9. Agro-biomass potentialLand use (Mha)

  10. Agro-biomass potentialDry biomass (Mt/y)

  11. Agro- biomass potentialDry biomass (%)

  12. Agro- biomass potentialBiomass production (t)

  13. Forests EU 25: Land cover(2000)

  14. Growing stock(Million m3) EU N: 6,420 EU C: 10,546 EU S: 2,767 Annual increment, fellings (2000)

  15. Current RTD projects • ENK6 CT2001 00524: Bioenergy chains for south Europe • Four perennial grasses: giant reed, cynara, switcgrass, miscanthus • Three thermochemical processes: combustion, gasification, pyrolysis • Whole chain economics & environmental assessments • Harvest window ensuring year round supply • Good time allocation of resources • Crops are complementary to current agricultural activities

  16. Current RTD projects • Cynara cardunculus: BIOCARD 6FP • Perennial crop suitable to med conditions • Can be rainfed • Wide range of products from biodiesel, heat & electricity • Good potential for biorefinery feedstock…

  17. Future RTD needs • Establish competitive supply chains to meet market requirements. • Optimise bioenergy systems, matching production options through to conversion requirements. • Improve know-how for stages between production and conversion.

  18. Resource production Yield & Characteristics • Sustained high yields over long term under commercial (not research) conditions • Multi-cropping of selected perennial crops for energy • Optimise forest management systems also for energy • Agronomy to influence biomass quality • Combined approaches of residual biomass & energy crops examined at pre-commercial chains • Determine production systems that best integrate with chain including conversion requirements.

  19. Harvesting & Collection Effectiveness & Speed • Test existing machinery • Develop and test new machines and components • Low contamination harvesting methods • Harvesting and collection must be effective and high speed, deliver feedstock in optimal state, and minimize site impacts

  20. Storage & Transport Reliability & Quality • Minimization of risks: fire, health. • Ensure quality: feedstock physical specifications • Optimise technology for chips / bales / pellets • Assess different logistic structures, such as centralized fuel depots.

  21. System integration • System sustainability – energy and emissions balance over life cycle of chain • System costs – vertical integration or each step as profit centre? • Stakeholders consultation – agro-industry, hauliers, energy industry, local communities. • Emergence of international trade of standardised biomass fuels – impacts? • Minimization of risk throughout the chain and demonstrating schemes can be financed.

  22. Challenges • Supply the industry with secure raw material • Efficient land use by the use of whole- crop solutions as well as exploiting both fertile and marginal land. • Ensure that both primary production and residues will be evaluated for their energy potential • Sustainability in biomass production- handling • Improve the acceptability of biomass filiere by strengthening the communication channels among the relevant stakeholders, especially the farming- forestry sectors with the respective fuel and energy sectors. • Local biomass production & international biomass trade

  23. Future options • Perennial crops, like cynara, giant reed, miscanthus and SRC like eycalypts, robinia • Annual crops possibilities for double cropping like in Germany • Green crop harvesting for AD-biogas and a second crop option for bioenergy – biofuels?? • Integrate energy crops within the current crop patterns as complementary activities • Ensure harvest window with crop selection • Integrate forest & agricultural activities to ensure supply

  24. Recommendations • Integrated waste management strategies • Introduce efficient land use strategies, complementary to current systems and regional characteristics • Sustainable forest residual harvest for energy prevents fire risks. “Make sure the message is clear enough!!”

  25. Conclusions- Next Steps To be completed with your valuable input!! Thank you for your attention

More Related