90 likes | 228 Views
What advantages should you expect from hybrid course redesign? Winterim Hybrid Course Redesign Workshop. Alan Aycock, Ph.D. Learning Technology Center University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee. Buy Me! Ads and Shopping in American Culture. Initially taught at graduate level in 2002
E N D
What advantages should you expect from hybrid course redesign? Winterim Hybrid Course Redesign Workshop Alan Aycock, Ph.D. Learning Technology Center University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee
Buy Me! Ads and Shopping in American Culture • Initially taught at graduate level in 2002 • Redesigned for Freshman Seminar program • FS program focuses on retention • Provides introduction to university-level work • Not an honors course • 19 first-year students, 70% women, 25% minority students
What do I know about my students? • Traditional first-year students have rarely ventured outside of immediate Midwest region • Mostly first-generation college students from working class background • Not critical readers nor inclined to read extensively • Nevertheless, experienced audience for advertising, consumer goods, and mass media • Most have worked in retail sector • Most are interested in and knowledgeable about fashion • Need to develop academic computer skills, though most know basics
What advantages does the hybrid mode offer? • Frequent low-stakes assignments • Rapid turn-around and feedback • Gradual increase in rigor • Seek to “break up” class by mixture of voices, e.g., lecture, class discussion, videos, small group work, individual projects • Emphasis on examination of own experience as American consumer
Choosing a model for hybrid course redesign • Classic works on “backwards design” • Understanding by Design, Wiggins & McTighe 2005 • Effective Grading, Walvoordt & Anderson 1998 • Advantages of backwards design • Practice-oriented instead of abstract theory • Intuitive for most faculty • Learning objectives linked to empirically verifiable outcomes
Backwards design process • What do I want my students to be able to do(i.e., not just “know”) at the end of the course? • What evidence or documentation do I require to demonstrate my students’ learning? • What learning activities will produce this evidence or documentation?
So what do I want my students to be able to do? • I want my students to apply standard forms of textual analysis to “decode” advertising, both print and audiovisual • I want my students to produce their own “thick” ethnographic data and analyze the data using a standard theoretical model of shopping • I want my students to extend the notion of “marketing” to areas that are not strictly commercial, e.g., science, religion, education
What evidence will I accept? • Use of standard textual-critical techniques such as asymmetry and substitution to identify “preferred” and “resistant” readings of ads • Use of “thick description” to delineate ethnographically relevant cognitive rules of shopping • Use of PowerPoint to use a multidimensional model to develop a shopping “mini-ethnography” • Use of the “marketing” metaphor to interpret students’ experience of religion, science, or education
Sample learning activities • Studying up exercise (asymmetry and substitution) • Shopping knowledge (“thick description”) • Shop until you drop (“mini-ethnography”) • Everything is a brand (extending the marketing idea)