200 likes | 367 Views
TIMETABLE FOR DATA ON FOSTER CHILDREN COLLECTED BY THE CENSUS BUREAU . FOSTER CHILDREN IDENTIFIED FOR FIRST TIME IN 2000 CENSUS.FOSTER CHILDREN IDENTIFIED IN AMERICAN COMMUNITY SURVEY (ACS) EACH YEAR FROM 2000 TO 2006NOVEMBER 2006 CENSUS BUREAU ANNOUNCES DECISION TO STOP IDENTIFYING FOSTER CHI
E N D
1. REVIEW OF DATA ON FOSTER CHILDREN COLLECTED BY THE U.S. CENSUS BUREAU WILLIAM O’HARE
KIDS COUNT CONFERENCE
SEPTEMBER 2007
2. TIMETABLE FOR DATA ON FOSTER CHILDREN COLLECTED BY THE CENSUS BUREAU FOSTER CHILDREN IDENTIFIED FOR FIRST TIME IN 2000 CENSUS.
FOSTER CHILDREN IDENTIFIED IN AMERICAN COMMUNITY SURVEY (ACS) EACH YEAR FROM 2000 TO 2006
NOVEMBER 2006 – CENSUS BUREAU ANNOUNCES DECISION TO STOP IDENTIFYING FOSTER CHILDREN IN CENSUS (ACS).
APRIL 2007 CENSUS BUREAU AGREES TO CONTINUE IDENTIFYING FOSTER CHILDREN IN ACS BUT NOT 2010 CENSUS
3. WHY IT IS BETTER TO HAVE THE FOSTER CHILD QUESTION IN THE ACS THAN IN 2010 CENSUS.
2010 CENSUS WILL COLLECT SHORT FORM DEMOGRAPHIC DATA ONLY
AGE
GENDER
RACE
HISPANIC ORIGIN
FAMILY STRUCTURE
THIS DATA ALREADY AVAILABLE IN AFCARS SYSTEM
REAL VALUE OF CENSUS DATA IS PROVIDING SOCIOECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF FOSTER FAMILIES
4. THE PROBLEM IS THAT THE CENSUS AND ACS ONLY CAPTURE DATA ON ABOUT HALF OF ALL CHILDREN IN FOSTER CARE
5. FOSTER CHILDREN ARE IDENTIFIED BY RELATIONSHIP TO HOUSEHOLDER QUESTION
7. NUMBER OF FOSTER CHILDREN IDENTIFIED
2000 CENSUS
334,974 IN SHORT FORM DATA
291,507 IN LONG FORM DATA (WEIGHTED)
15,429 IN LONG FORM CASES (UNWEIGHTED)
9. ONLY TWO AFCARS CATEGORIES ARE LIKELY TO BE IDENTIFIED AS FOSTER CHILDREN IN THE CENSUS NONKINSHIP FAMILY FOSTER CARE
258,007 CHILDREN IN 2000 (single largest category of children in foster care)
PRE-ADOPTIVE VISIT
- 22,124 CHILDREN IN 2000
10. HOW WELL DOES CENSUS BUREAU DATA ON FOSTER CHILDREN REFLECT SUBSET OF ALL FOSTER CHILDREN ( I.E. FAMILY FOSTER CARE AND PRE-ADOPTIVE HOMES)?
11. IDEA -- COMPARE DEMOGRAPHICS OF ACS FOSTER CHILD POPULAITON TO THOSE OF TWO GROUPS OF AFCARS THAT ARE LIKELY TO BE IDENTIFIED IN CENSUS AGE,
GENDER,
RACE/HISPAIC,
STATE DISTRIBUTION
12. PROBLEMS OF COMPARING ACS AND AFCARS DATA ACS DATA HAVE LARGE SAMPLING ERRORS
SOME OF THE DATA ELEMENTS IN AFCARS (RACE) ARE KNOWN TO BE WRONG
DEMOGRAPHIC DATA FOR TWO GROUPS OF FOSTER CHILDREN LIKELY TO BE INCLUDED IN CENSUS ARE DIFFICULT TO FIND.
13. POTENTIAL USE OF FOSTER CHILDREN (FOSTER FAMILY) DATA FROM THE ACSCURRENTLY ALMOST NO SYSTEMATIC DATA ON FOSTER FAMILIES – FOSTER CAREGIVERS.
18. CURRENT ISSUES IS IT POSSIBLE TO PRODUCE DATA BELOW NATIONAL LEVEL
STATES?
RACE GROUPS?
OTHER GROUPS
COHABITING PARTNERS
SINGLE PARENTS
19. Foster Care Sample Cases in 2005 ACS Households Kids
100% …………… 2,920 4,670
PUMS sample… 1,924 3,094
State numbers range from 441kids in California
1 in Vermont – most are under 50
20. CURRENT ISSUES IS CENSUS BUREAU DATA REPRESENTATIVE ENOUGH TO PRODUCE USEFUL DATA ON FOSTER FAMILIES?
IF SO, ACS DATA FROM 100% OF SAMPLE (THROUGH PRB) VERSUS DATA FROM PUMS FILE
WHO SHOULD/WILL PRODUCE SUCH DATA
CENSUS BUREAU
CASEY FOUNDATION
OTHER
21. NEXT STEPS CONTINUE EFFORTS TO SEE IF DATA GOOD ENOUGH FOR WIDESPREAD DISSEMINATION
CONTINUE EXPLORING DATA
PRESENTATION IN FRONT OF OTHER AUDIENCES
CONVENE GROUP OF EXPERTS
IF DATA IS GOOD ENOUGH, WHAT SHOULD CASEY DO TO MAKE DATA AVAILABLE? WHAT ABOUT AFCARS DATA TOO?