230 likes | 379 Views
Polarization Measurements of RHIC-pp RUN05 Using CNI pC-Polarimeter. Itaru Nakagawa (RIKEN/RBRC) On behalf of CNI Polarimeter Group
E N D
Polarization Measurements of RHIC-pp RUN05 Using CNI pC-Polarimeter Itaru Nakagawa (RIKEN/RBRC) On behalf of CNI Polarimeter Group I.G.AlekseevA A.BravarB G.BunceB S.DhawanD R.GillB H.HuangB W.HaeberliE G.IgoF O.Jinnouchi V.P.KanavetsA K.KuritaH A.KhodinovJ Z.LiB Y.MakdisiB A.NassB W.LozowskiI W.W.MacKayB H.OkadaG S.ResciaB T.RoserB N. SaitoG H.SpinkaL D.N.SviridaA D.UnderwoodL C.WittenF T.WiseI J.WoodF A.ZelenskiB RBRC ITEPA BNLB ANLC Yale UD Wisconsin UE UCLAF Kyoto UG Rikkyo UH Indiana UI StonyBrook UJ IUCFK Argonne UL
Carbon target 90º in Lab frame Recoil carbon Polarized proton Polarimetry: Impact on RHIC-SPIN Single Spin Asymmetries Physics Asymmetries Pbeam Required Accuracy ~5% Double Spin Asymmetries Polarization measurement by Elastic pp/pC
Recoil Carbon pC Analyzing Power AN (100GeV) t-dependence L. Trueman hep-ph/0305085 Need to Measure Recoil Energy
Absolute Polarimeter (H jet) RHIC pC Polarimeters Siberian Snakes BRAHMS & PP2PP (p) RHIC PHENIX (p) STAR (p) Siberian Snakes Spin Rotators Solenoid Snake LINAC BOOSTER Pol. Proton Source 500 mA, 400 ms AGS Warm Snake 200 MeV Polarimeter AC Dipole AGS pC CNI Polarimeter Cold Snake RHIC Polarimetry
Characteristics of pC polarimeter High Event Rate • Large Cross Section • Solid target • 20 sec./measurement for ~ 2% statistics. • Immediate feedback to accelerator operation • “Bunch by Bunch” beam polarization structure • Polarization profile measurement
Ultra thin Carbon ribbon Target (3.5mg/cm2) 6 1 18cm 2 5 Si strip detectors (TOF, EC) Physics asymmetry 3 4 90 deg Physics 45 deg Physics False asymmetry 6 1 6 1 Cross (Forbidden) Up-Down (Radial) 1 6 6 1 2 5 5 2 5 5 2 2 3 3 4 4 3 3 4 4 pC Polarimeter Setup 2mm pitch 12 strips 10mm 72 strips in total Redundancy Systematic/Consistency Check
Strip by Strip Consistency • 2 Distribution of sin() fit • Well Distributed around 1 • Evidence of Consistent Polarization Measurements by individual strips
L Time of Flight tmeas[ns] Carbon Target Tdeposit (keV)) (adc) (DeadLayer) Energy Correction (t0,x) Kinematic Fit
Energy Correction (Stability) Stability Error 9 ~ 11 g/cm2
2mm 2mm Run5 Polarization Profile Polarization Polarization Count Rate[Hz] Count Rate[Hz]
Uncertainties & Summary Relative Run5 Smaller Smaller
angle [deg.] Fill Number Azimuthal Angle Distribution = 0 deg. angle [deg.] Fill Number
Energy Correction Kinetic Energy = 400keV Energy Loss [keV] Observation • Typical Thickness 〜50 g/cm2 Correction
Event Selection Dependence 3 2 2 vs 3 Cut Consistency Systematic Error
Event Selection Error ~ 1% ( was 3% in Run3,4) Event Selection Error
6 1 2 5 2mm pitch 12 strips 3 4 Strip by Strip Consistency ~ sin() fit ~
Road Map to Finalize the Analysis • Remaining Major Items • Continue QA (3 weeks) • Suspicious bunch, strips • Study Off-Centered Target Measurements(2 ~ 4weeks) • Fill by Fill Analysis • Polarization Profile • Normalization with Jet (4 weeks)
Energy Correction(g/cm2) Strip Number (72 Total) Energy Correction (Strip by Strip Consistency) • All Detectors are made from same wafers • Any inconsistency should be accounted as sys
Systematic Error Summary(1) Energy Correction [ug/cm2] ( ):Relative Error
Contents • Kinematics Reconstruction • source energy calibration • Deadlayer energy correction • Systematic error estimation(1) • Polarization (1st Path Analysis Results) • Online/Offline • Event selection 2/3 • Strip by strip consistency sin() fit • Systematic error estimation (2)