1 / 10

Dr Simon Brewster, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK

ESOU Challenging the EAU Guidelines Debate: Stage 1 Non- seminomatous germ cell tumours of the testis should all be managed by Surveillance. Dr Simon Brewster, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK. Introduction.

jerica
Download Presentation

Dr Simon Brewster, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ESOU Challenging the EAU Guidelines Debate: Stage 1 Non-seminomatous germ cell tumours of the testis should all be managed by Surveillance Dr Simon Brewster, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK

  2. Introduction • Primary testicular cancer is the most common malignancy in men aged 25-40 years; 2109/year in UK; • Incidence increasing, affecting 6-10 per 100000 men in Europe; • 90% are germ cell tumours, of which 42% are NSGCT; • Following orchidectomy, 33-50% NSGCT are clinical stage 1 (CS1 = TxN0M0 according to serum markers and CT), of whom 70% are cured by surgery alone; • 30% CS1 NSGCT patients harbour occult metastatic disease and will relapse (Vergouwe, 2003).

  3. Risk factors for CS1 NSGCT relapse • Vascular invasion (VI) by tumour cells in the primary tumour - 48% will relapse with metastatic disease (while 52% will not) • 15% patients without VI will also relapse. • Lymphatic invasion; • Embryonal carcinoma (EC); • Absence of yolk sac tumour; • MIB-1 staining of primary tumour; • VI plus >70% MIB-1 staining plus >50% EC predicts relapse in 64% of patients (Albers, 2003) • EAU 2009 Guidelines favour the use of VI as the best risk factor for relapse.

  4. EAU 2009 Guidelines on post-orchiectomy “risk-adapted” management of CS1 NSGCT • Low-risk cases, defined as pT1 (no VI): SURVEILLANCE 5 years (because 15% will relapse) recommended. • High-risk cases, defined as pT2 (=pT1 with VI), pT3-4, or low-risk cases not suitable for surveillance: in order to reduce risk of relapse, TWO CYCLES OF ADJUVANT CYTOTOXIC CHEMOTHERAPY (BEP) or retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) recommended.

  5. Adjuvant chemotherapy in CS1 NSGCT with VI: Outcomes • No randomised level 1 evidence of benefit • 2 cycles of BEP: only 3% of patients relapse, therefore risk reduction is 95%; >99% of patients are cured (MRC: Cullen, 1996; Chevreau, 2004); • 1 cycle of BEP: 3.2% of patients relapse; risk reduction is 90% (Tandstad, 2009)

  6. Toxicity of BEP chemotherapy • Hair loss & Neutropenia 100% • Transient infertility likely: cryopreservation necessary; • Cardiovascular effects: hypertension, Raynaud’s phenomenon, myocardial ischaemia / infarction, CVA; up to 15 years later; x 2-7 increased risk (Meinardi, 2000; Huddart, 2003) • Renal impairment: 20-30% most sub-clinical (Fossa, 2001) • Anxiety and depression; Weight gain (Sangstuern, 2005) • Ototoxicity 23-30% (Strumberg, 2002) • Neuropathy 30% (Strumberg, 2002) • Second cancer development, approx. x1.5 risk

  7. Surveillance in CS1 NSGCT: Outcomes • 88% relapses occur during years 1-2 post-orchiectomy; • Relapses are rarely reported >5 years follow-up; • Evaluations must include clinical examination, serum markers, CXR (5 years) and CT scans (at least 2 years); • Non risk-adapted surveillance: • of 371 patients 1981-2005, 28% overall (52% VI+ve; 16% VI –ve) relapsed; 72% spared further treatment; survival (following salvage BEP +/- RPLND) >99% (Zuniga, Toronto group, 2009); • Of 223 patients, median follow-up 52 months, 26% overall (52% VI+ve; 0% VI –ve) relapsed; 74% spared further treatment; survival 100% (Kollmansgerger, British Columbia group, 2009)

  8. Case history • Mr AH age 28 years, chef, recent move to Oxford • Mixed GCT right testis, 2.6cm lower pole, pT2 • Serum markers and CT scans normal • Underwent 2 cycles BEP over 6 weeks • Cryopreservation undertaken prior to treatment • Family live in Scotland so unable to support him • Became depressed, unable to work for 6 months, no income, fatigued, counselled for stress, unable to concentrate, complained of tinitus, peripheral parasthesia, hair loss and nausea.

  9. ConclusionThe EAU Guideline recommending adjuvant chemotherapy to high-risk CS1 NSGCT patients will result in >50% of these young men being overtreated with cytotoxic drugs, for NO PROVEN SURVIVAL BENEFIT.

More Related