1 / 21

Heavy Flavour Meeting 02/06/2005

Heavy Flavour Meeting 02/06/2005. Semileptonic charm decays to electrons in DIS with 1996-2000 e + p data. Mónica Vázquez Sunil Patel. Motivation. Charm production in DIS is a testing ground for QCD m charm >> L QCD : perturbative calculations can be performed

jerod
Download Presentation

Heavy Flavour Meeting 02/06/2005

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Heavy Flavour Meeting02/06/2005 Semileptonic charm decays to electrons in DIS with 1996-2000 e+p data Mónica Vázquez Sunil Patel

  2. Motivation • Charm production in DIS is a testing ground for QCD • mcharm >> LQCD : perturbative calculations can be performed • Dominant contribution is BGF, sensitive to the gluon PDF • Charm tagging through detection of charmed mesons BR(c→D*→pKpS) = 2.57 % BR(c→e-) = 9.6  0.4 %

  3. Data and Monte Carlo Samples Data: 96-97 e+p, 38.6 pb-1 99-00 e+p, 65.0 pb-1 Inclusive DIS MC: 96-97 ARIADNE, CTEQ5L, L = 19.6 pb-1 99-00 ARIADNE, CTEQ5L, L = 65.1 pb-1 Semileptonic Charm MC: 96-97 RAPGAP 3.0 CTEQ5L 260.5 pb-1  6  L9697 99-00 RAPGAP 3.0 CTEQ5L 383.3 pb-1  6  L9900

  4. NLO Calculation: HVQDIS • NLO QCD calculation of charm SL DECAY with HVQDIS • PDF: ZEUS01 • Charm mass: 1.35 GeV (consistent with PDF fit) • Varied to 1.20 and 1.50 GeV but not in the PDF for the moment • Renormalisation and Factorisation scales: • Peterson fragmentation:e=0.035 • Hadronisation fraction:0.096 (PDG 2004) • Thanks to Manuel Zambrana for the help! varied a factor 4, 0.25

  5. Trigger Chain • (Dst9&&Dst11) && (Flt44 || Flt46) && TltDIS03 • DST 09 Electron • Elec5, Local, Exotic, Sinistra, or Sinistra95 electron with energy > 4 GeV • No TLT bits Required • DST 11 Nominal neutral current • TLTNC or TLTLQ , E - pz + 2*lumi g > 30 • DIS 03 Medium Q2 • Sinistra or Emille electron with energy > 4 GeV • Radius > 25 cm (9697) or 35 cm (9900) for RCAL electrons • DISEMPZ • FLTBITS && SLTBITS • FLT 44 REMC or BEMC • FLT 46 RCAL Iso E

  6. DIS selection criteria Positron:Box cut: rpositron> 25.5 cm (35.5 cm) Probability > 0.9 Energy > 10 GeV Q2DA> 25 GeV2 0.03<yDA< 0.7 yel < 0.95 yjb>0.02 38 < E-pz < 65 GeV Ntrkvtx> 0 , |Zvtx| < 50cm (regular tracking) True Cuts: Q2 > 25 GeV2 0.03 < y < 0.7 Detector

  7. Control Plots: Scattered Positron quantities 96-97 99-00

  8. Control Plots: Tracking quantities 96-97 99-00

  9. Control Plots: Kinematic variables 96-97 99-00

  10. Electron Identification • Electron tagging using: • ZUFOs • dEdx (Detlef's corrections) • track requirement • 1.2 < p < 5 GeV • (for better separation of hadrons) • 0.65 < Θ < 2.5 rad  7 CTD SL • (for good dEdx recostruction) • CAL deposit requirement • EEMC/ETOT>0.9 ("electron sample") • EEMC/ETOT<0.4 ("hadron sample") → Estimate background CTD dEdx corrections 1 - run-by-run corrections 2 - air pressure correction (if available) 3 - threshold correction 4 - corrections for space charge effect 5 - pt corrections

  11. Signal Extraction • Hadron sample reweighted to electron sample in p,q • Hadron sample scaled to the electron sample in the region • 0.8 < dEdx < 1.1, where the hadron background is dominant • Hadron sample is subtracted from the electron sample

  12. Dominant e- Background:CONVERSIONS Convert2 package is used to tag conversionswith D<15 • 1.2 < pe- < 5 GeV • pe+ > 200 MeV (for good track reconstruction efficiency) • TSAI NLO QED calculation: used to determine invisible conversions kTsai inverse of histogram

  13. Other e- background: Dalitz decays and semileptonic beauty decays • Dalitz decays of neutral pions: π0 →γ e+ e- • Branching ratio small(1.1980.032%) but large abundance of π0 in DIS • Tagging method: • Every e- candidate is combined with all positive tracks in the event. • If the minimum invariant mass is < 0.2 GeV the candidate is rejected. • The number of Dalitz decays is the difference between not making and • making this requirement. Semileptonic decays of beauty: previous studies <3% (MC estimate on the way)

  14. Comparison of the two analysis

  15. Signal Plots 96-97 99-00

  16. 9697 Data - Bins of Q2 96-97

  17. 9900 Data - Bins of Q2 99-00

  18. Calculating Cross sections 96-97 99-00

  19. 9697 Data - ds/dQ2 Dalitz and slbeauty background not subtracted yet

  20. 9900 Data - ds/dQ2 Dalitz and slbeauty background not subtracted yet

  21. Outlook • Include estimate of Dalitz and beauty electron background • in cross sections. Previous analysis (Dalitz < 4%, Beauty < 3%) • Investigate difference seen between the two analysis • in the number of DIS events ~0.5% • Vary the charm mass consistently in the HVQDIS calculation • Add more differential cross sections ds/dy, ds/dptSLe, ds/dhSLe

More Related