350 likes | 387 Views
Explore the importance of functional communication training in enhancing individuals' communicative skills, improving quality of life, and overcoming barriers. Learn how communication breakdowns impact behavior, cognition, and social integration. Discover practical strategies for fostering effective communication through rapport-building and understanding the form versus function of behavior.
E N D
Functional Communication Training Revisited Enhancing Communication to Enhance Quality of Life Darlene Magito McLaughlin, Ph.D. Positive Behavior Support Consulting & Psychological Resources, P.C.
Introduction and Overview • The ability to communicate with others is a vital human skill that enables one to be an active participant in society and to exercise control over the environment.
Communication Breakdown • Acquisition • Fluency • Maintenance • Generalization
Barriers to Communication • Low expectations • Status quo • Lack of skill or knowledge from professionals • Lack of qualified personnel to assess and/or address communication challenges • Failure to keep up with emergent technology; lack of continuing education • Limitations of augmentative systems: expensive, non-transferable, lost, broken, difficulties programming
Barriers continued… • Staff turnover; lack of continuity • Limited carryover across environments (home-school-community) • Limited coordination between education, speech, psychology, and direct care staff • Limited data collection • Stigmatization
When Communication Breaks Down… • Often leads to severe problem behavior • Can prevent full community inclusion (home, school, employment) • Can frustrate family members, teachers, and support staff • Can increase the likelihood of restrictive settings and procedures (loss of dignity and choice)
When Communication Breaks Down… • Can lead to rejection by others (social isolation, lack of friends) • Can be damaging to self-esteem • Can alter quality of life
Background • Early on, behavior analysis focused on the form of behavior, and emphasized consequence-based strategies for increasing and decreasing behaviors • The arrival of functional analysis brought an increased recognition of the purposeful nature of behavior, setting the stage for a communication hypothesis
The Purposeful Nature of Behavior • Behaviors are not random, bizarre acts but, instead, are purposeful in nature • Classes of controlling variables • Medical • Escape • Attention • Tangibles • Sensory
Conceptual Base for a Communication Hypothesis • An inverse relationship exists between the frequency of behavior problems and the level of communicative skill that an individual possesses • Problem behaviors can be usefully viewed as a nonverbal form of communication • As an individual acquires more sophisticated forms of communication, primitive forms become less effective and either drop out or remain only minimally
Advantages of the Communication Model • Focuses on skill-building and educational considerations • Individuals can initiate interactions that eventually lead to preferred reinforcers (active role in treatment process) • Increased communication=Increased control • Control, in itself, may be a reinforcer (competence, mastery, etc.)
Assessment • Functional Analysis is used to identify purpose • Three-Stage Process: • Describe: Interview and direct observation • Categorize: Common themes and hypotheses • Verify: Confirm or disconfirm; consider setting events
Communication Hypothesis: Medical • Problem Behavior = “I’m not feeling well.” • Identify acute, recurrent, and chronic conditions • Pinpoint area of discomfort • Identify potential remedies
Communication Hypothesis: Escape • Problem Behavior = “I would like to take a break.” • Consider type of task (gross vs. fine motor) • Role of feedback • Speed of task (pace of instruction) • Novelty vs. repetition • Type of prompt (e.g., gestural vs. physical)
Communication Hypothesis: Attention • Problem behavior = “Hello” or “Excuse me.” • From whom (e.g., preferred vs. non-preferred person)? • Content (e.g., game vs. conversation) • When (e.g., bedtime vs. snack)?
Communication Hypothesis: Tangible or Sensory Reinforcement • Problem behavior = “I want…” or “I need…” • Specific item/activity? Or class of items/activities? • Negotiation (alternative, time and place) • Delayed gratification
Practical Applications: Part 1 • Rapport • Form vs. Function • Opportunity • Tolerance for Delay
Key Idea #1: Building Rapport • Rapport is an important consideration in functional communication training. The person receiving the training has to want to communicate with you! • Reasons why rapport might be poor • Little in common • Lack of communication • History of negative interactions
Assessment of Rapport • Participant: Choice behavior • Staff member: Subjective rating scale • Observers: Relative rankings
Building Rapport • Pair with positives • Responsivity (3A-Rule) • Reciprocity and turn-taking
Key Idea #2: Form vs. Function • Functional Equivalence • Modality: “My Favorite Thing” • Ease, Efficiency, and Interpretability • Durability and Portability • Vocabulary Selection • Preference Inventory • GeneralSpecific
Form vs. Function (continued) • Augmentative, Alternative, and Assistive Technology Systems • Daily Schedules • Embedded Schedules • “Super Symbols” • First-Then Boards • Activity Displays • Task Analyses • Turn-taking Boards
Key Idea #3: Opportunity • ACES: Analyzing the Communication Environment • Utilize information gathered during functional analysis • Reinforce communication during normal event sequences • Attend to requests at high rates. At the same time, make problem behavior inefficient.
Key Idea #4: Tolerance for Delay • Shaping: Independent Schedule • ContinuousIntermittent Schedules of SR+ • Fade staff prompting • Be flexible; may be necessary to go back • Teach discrimination by using natural cues • Use filled pauses • Handle “Breaks over” problem
Practical Applications: Part 2 • Mood/Embedding • Choice • Lasting change
Key Idea #5: Mood/Embedding • Works particularly well with escape-motivated problem behavior • Assessment of mood • Interaction effect between mood and demands • Reasons why mood might be poor
Mood/Embedding (continued) • Options for intervention • Eliminate events that are associated with bad mood • Eliminate demands • Embed demands within a positive context
Key Idea #6: Choice • Increase opportunities for an individual to influence the environment in a socially appropriate manner through shared control with the treatment agent • Choose what task, with whom, what reinforcers, etc.
Key Idea #7: Lasting Change • Begin in a controlled setting; move to a less controlled one • Train natural supports across all relevant settings • Move toward systems change • Variations in routine, variety, flexibility, etc. • Incentives for staff
Individual Applications • Case Examples • FCT • Mood • Rapport
To Do List… • Identify the need for assistance • Conduct a functional and/or environmental analysis • Develop a communication plan • Train relevant staff • Implement the plan • Monitor success • Troubleshoot, if necessary
Communication and Quality of Life • Relationships • Community • Choice • Skills • Respected Roles
Conclusions • Decision Control, Before and Now • Communication plays an integral part in quality of life enhancement