1 / 15

House B Science – T. Hunt

This report analyzes student grades in multiple subjects, highlights high achieving students, compares class averages, and provides improvement strategies based on observations. It emphasizes the importance of practice, attendance, and seeking assistance. Suggestions for students to enhance their academic performance are outlined, focusing on completion of assignments, identifying weak areas, seeking help, and enhancing exam preparation techniques.

jgowen
Download Presentation

House B Science – T. Hunt

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. House BScience – T. Hunt 2nd Marking Period Grade Analysis

  2. Grade Analysis (House B - 2nd Marking Period Science) • A’s – 56 (35.90%) • B’s – 47 (30.13%) • C’s – 32 (20.51%) • D’s – 11 (07.05%) • F’s – 10 (06.41%) * Listed values are out of 160 total students; 4 received an incomplete score and are not included in this count.

  3. Top of the Team • The following students scored 95% or higher during the 2nd marking period. – Congratulations to all. 100% - Laura Armstrong, Sophia Capecci, Jillian Nord, SamayRuparelia 99.46% - Colleen Duffy 98.93% - Grace Pfluger 98.39% - Lucas Guinan, Brendan Kaiser 97.29% - Cole Vaughn 95.72% - Lilah Shtino 95.45% - Evan O’Neil 95.18% - Matt Campbell, Valerie Feng, Sarah Tredway 95.13% - Sonilia Davis 95.00% - Bailey Hodgson, Nicole Ilkovic, Skylar Lall

  4. Analysis of Scores Per Instructional Period

  5. Grade Analysis (Scorpio) • A’s – 14 (45.16%) • B’s – 05 (16.13%) • C’s – 06 (19.35%) • D’s – 04 (12.90%) • F’s – 02 (06.45%) ------------------------------------------------------------- 31 total students class average (mean) – 81%

  6. Grade Analysis (Draco) • A’s – 07 (20.00%) • B’s – 15 (42.86%) • C’s – 06 (17.14%) • D’s – 01 (02.86%) • F’s – 04 (11.43%) • Incomplete – 02 (5.71%) ------------------------------------------------------------- 35 total students class average (mean) – 76%

  7. Grade Analysis (Leo) • A’s – 11 (39.30%) • B’s – 09 (32.14%) • C’s – 03 (10.71%) • D’s – 03 (10.71%) • F’s – 02 (07.14%) ------------------------------------------------------------- 28 total students class average (mean) – 81%

  8. Grade Analysis (Orion) • A’s – 15 (48.39%) • B’s – 06 (19.35%) • C’s – 07 (22.58%) • D’s – 01 (03.23%) • F’s – 02 (06.45%) ------------------------------------------------------------- 31 total students class average (mean) – 83%

  9. Grade Analysis (Gemini) • A’s – 09 (27.27%) • B’s – 12 (36.36%) • C’s – 10 (30.30%) • D’s – 02 (06.07%) • F’s – 00 (00.00%) ------------------------------------------------------------- 33 total students class average (mean) – 82%

  10. Mr. Hunt’s Analysis • Observation 1: Most growth occurred amongst students who ended the 1st marking period at the lower end of the grading spectrum. 63% of this group moved from the below basic category (D, F) into the basic category (C). The remaining 37% moved from the basic category (C) into the proficient (B, A-) or advanced category (A, A+)

  11. Observation 2: 92% of the decreasing scores this term resulted as students moved from the advanced category into the proficient category – (A to B drop).

  12. Observation 3: A direct correlation between overall success (determined by the final score) and student practice (determined by the number of successful practice assignments submitted) was observed. By the numbers: Students scoring below basic completed on average 21% of the assigned practice compared to 84% of the students who reached the basic or higher category. Students who practice are able to identify concerns and proactively work with the instructor to adjust where and when needed.

  13. Observation 4: A direct correlation between overall success and class attendance was observed. By the numbers: Students scoring below basic were absent from class 58% of the time more than their peers who scored basic or higher. Students absent from class must understand that papers are not going to instruct, that class discussions and meaningful practice alongside the instructor will identify areas of concern and offer strategies for assistance. .

  14. What does this mean for me? Students who score below the statistical average should revisit the following areas: • have I completed my practice assignments? • have I identified areas of concern? • have I sought assistance in areas of weakness? - how did I approach and/or study for exams?

  15. What Now • The year is half over. Routines need to be adjusted to ensure that you are in control of your learning. • Your teachers want to help. Ask appropriate questions, seek assistance, and work together to address concerns. ** Let’s look forward to a great second half of the year! **

More Related