1 / 12

First Report of Implementation Monitor

The report outlines the validation and monitoring of LASD's implementation of policies, procedures, and practices, with a focus on funding, training, and supervision. It details completion statuses, priorities, and implementation timetable, emphasizing the need for timely action. Recommendations, implementation issues, and timing concerns are addressed for effective system enhancements.

jhathaway
Download Presentation

First Report of Implementation Monitor

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. First Report of Implementation Monitor Richard E. Drooyan December 18, 2012

  2. Implementation Plan • Policies and Procedures • Validate LASD’s implementation of policies and procedures recommended by CCJV • Monitor LASD’s on-going adherence to new policies and procedures • Practices • Verify LASD’s acceptance of practices recommended by CCJV • Final report on LASD’s implementation of recommended practices

  3. Timing Issues • Appointment of Assistant Sheriff for Custody • Funding • Custody specific training • Custody supervision • Funding Issues • Funding requests for 11 recommendations • Review by CEO and consultants • Meet and Confer Issues • Custody Assistant/Deputy Sheriff ratio • Supervisory pay

  4. Timing Issues (cont.) • Consultants’ reviews • Use of force • Training • Supervision • Disciplinary system

  5. Summary of Implementation of Recommendations (as of 12/12/12) • Completed* 2 • Accepted** 6 • In progress 44 • Not started 8 • Non-LASD recommendations 3 • TOTAL 63 * Policies and procedures completed by LASD and validated by Monitor ** Recommended practices accepted by LASD

  6. Priorities • Assistant Sheriff for Custody (funding) • Use of force policy • Personal Engagement by Sheriff • Custody Career • Custody Training (funding) • Increased supervision (funding)

  7. Timetable for Implementation • Completed/accepted 8 • Within 30 days 20 • Within 90 days 18 • Within 180 days 6 • Longer 8 • Total60 • Funding Requested 11

  8. Next 30-day implementation • Use of Force Policy • Analyze Inmate Grievances • Tracking of UOF • Campaign Contribution policy • Video review policy • Separation of deputies

  9. Implementation Issues • Assistant Sheriff for Custody • Search • Vetting and Selection Process • Timing Concerns • Additional time required • Delay in implementation

  10. Timing Concerns • Additional Time Required (1/1/13) • Assistant Sheriff for Custody* • Additional supervisors* • Dual track for custody • Ratio of Custody Assistants to Deputies** • Creation of internal investigations division* • Risk Managers for each jail* *Funding Requested **Meet and Confer

  11. Timing Concerns (cont.) • Delay in implementation • Single data tracking system (6/1/15) • Grievances tracked in PPI (6/1/15) • Hold managers accountable (11/1/13) • Rotation policy (12/31/13) • Improve inmate grievance process (12/31/14)

  12. Conclusion • Cooperation by Sheriff and LASD • Input from Advisory Team and Consultants • Expect substantial progress within 90 days • Most recommendations implemented by 7/1/13 • Future monitoring by Internal Audit unit and external OIG

More Related