1 / 8

Evaluation of candidate procedures - Status & Reporting -

This technical report outlines the evaluation matrix established by the RDE-LDV working group in June 2012 in Brussels. The matrix aims to assess the technical feasibility, strengths, and weaknesses of candidate procedures while providing stakeholders with essential information for decision-making. The report highlights recent changes, stakeholder input, and criteria adjustments to enhance the evaluation process.

jhutcherson
Download Presentation

Evaluation of candidate procedures - Status & Reporting -

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Evaluation of candidate procedures- Status & Reporting - RDE-LDV working group 28 June 2012, Brussels, EU Martin Weiss Pierre Bonnel DG - Joint Research Centre (JRC) IET - Institute for Energy and Transport

  2. Evaluation matrix Objectives of the evaluation matrix: • To provide a synthetic view of criteria which were used to assess the technical feasibility and potential strengths and weaknesses of the tow candidate procedures • To provide stakeholders with know-how about the procedures and to therefore to support objective decision making • Not to provide any ranking system establishing priority criteria and/or weighing

  3. Evaluation matrix Main principles for establishing the evaluation: • Whenever possible, ‘supporting evidence’ was provided (e.g. test results, drivability) • Otherwise, the evaluation was made based on the best available knowledge • Stakeholders’ input is reflected in the unconsolidated and consolidated evaluation matrix • Consolidated matrix tentatively reflects the consensus.

  4. Evaluation matrix Current status: • Final stakeholders input received and discussed during the previous RDE meeting • Consolidated matrix to be integrated in the Phase 1 report (Possibly opening the door for last comments / remarks)

  5. Evaluation matrix – recent changes • Splitting the first criterion into two criteria • Preventing detection and by-passing of emissions test by the engine control unit • Preventing a too narrow calibration of vehicle technologies • Adding a footnote on the importance of reproducibility and repeatability for manufacturers • Adding a footnote on initial costs of implementation for manufacturers and technical services • Mentioning the relevance of traffic conditions for the “Certainty of the certification schedule” • Mentioning the uncertainty of GPS data in the “Accuracy of the analytical equipment” • RC: medium evaluation regarding “Influence of measurement procedure/equipment on results” • RC and PEMS: medium evaluation regarding “Coverage of ambient conditions”

  6. Evaluation matrix – recent changes • Changes proposed by 1 stakeholder (27 June) • Changes marked red in the recent evaluation matrix (28 June) and – due to late submission - subject to discussion and potential revision

  7. Technical Report RDE-LDV Phase 1 Contents 1. Introduction and mandate 2. Objectives of the RDE-LDV working group 3. Background • Legal mandate • Overview on-road emissions of light-duty vehicles 4. Milestones of the RDE-LDV working group • Organization of the work, reference to the work plan • Milestones until June 2012

  8. Technical Report: RDE-LDV Phase 1 Contents ... 5. Evaluation of candidate procedures • Consolidated evaluation matrix • Objective results supporting the evaluation (description of the random cycle generator; assessment of drivability; back-to-back testing of random cycle and PEMS • Evaluation matrix 6. Discussion • Uncertainty for some criteria; lessons learned; open issues 7. Conclusions and recommendations

More Related