1.03k likes | 1.15k Views
Explore the factors driving European credit spreads in structured finance markets. Analyze performance, risk, and market instability post-2008 crisis, with insights on securitization, investor behavior, and government actions.
E N D
13 January 2009 European Structured Finance 2008-09 Alexander Batchvarov, CFA +44 20 7995 8649alexander_batchvarov@ml.com Ludwig Clement +44 20 7995 0432ludwig_clement@ml.com Caspar Cook, CFA +44 131 473 1055caspar_cook@ml.comAltynay Davletova, CFA +44 20 7995 3968altynay_davletova@ml.com James Martin +44 20 7995 0110james_martin@ml.com Furquan Kidwai +44 20 7996 2536furquan_kidwai@ml.com Sabine Winkler +44 20 7995 4756sabine_winkler@ml.com What Drives European Credit Spreads - 2009 Product ID
2008 - an exceptional year in every respect • Rated new issuance exceded Eur700bn, much higher than in previous years • Public placement - maybe less than 2.5% of new issuance • Main primary market investor- the central banks • Secondary market - main focus of remaining investors • Spreads - wide across stack, asset classes and geographies • CDS on ABS - a viable investment instrument for the cash strapped investor; volatile basis • Spread volatility - not a surprise, but how much is driven by fundamentals and how much by technicals • US and European ABS - mutually re-enhanced relationship in secondary spreads
2008 - an exceptional year in every respect • Performance of European structured finance bonds deteriorating, but the majority of the European structured finance transactions perform according to initial expectations • Rating agencies changes in methodology and/or assumptions adding to market instability - an event risk rather than credit risk • Deteriorating credit performance - is the actual deterioration within expectations or beyond expectations? • MtM sensitivity - unnecessary for structured, illiquid and difficult to value positions - drove traditional investors away from the market and converted buyers into forced sellers • Reputational issues - media frenzy and financial institutions reputation - better lose one’s shirt in equity than a shirt’s button in structured finance! • Wider markets’ lack of understanding of the structured finance world • Events that were never meant to happen - demise of the monolines, hitting a MT NAT test (who gave that advise?!), collapse of the commercial paper market, rise and fall of the systemic bank risk, decline of covered bonds liquidity and collapse of related market-making mechanism, multi-notch downgrades due to radical changes in rating methodology - a squadron of blcak swans!
The demise of the parallel banking system • Banks and finance companies actively originate loans in the expectation that they can off-load them to long-term investors • Securitisation is the transformation mechanism by which pools of loans are converted into bonds with different risk profile • Securitisation bonds are sold to investors with different risk appetite - investors of the senior part of 70-90% of each transaction play a key part in the placement • Investors base for the senior and bulkiest part of the securtisation bonds comprise banks, SIVs, ABCP conduits and hedge funds - all rely on short-term funding and/or leverage • The parallel banking system replicated the traditional gap (short-term funding / long-term investing) of traditional banking system without the benefit of CB aid • A run on the parallel banking system occurred when the short-term markets shut down, bringing the main players of the parallel banking system to their knees • The parallel banking system provided credit to the tune of USD1.5-1.8trl p.a. globally in the preceding five years (Western Europe E350-500bn p.a. from securitisation plus E150-200bn p.a. from covered bonds) • The elimination of credit flows from the parallel banking system without a replacement provider of that credit in the near team is having a devastating effect on the markets and the economies of many countries around the world
Government actions • Actions associated with providing liquidity to the markets • Repo facilities and repo eligibility (categories II, III, IV, V) • Actions meant to stimulate new lending • Guarantee for financing of new lending (the UK) • Actions to support borrowers facing debt service difficulties • Spain and Italy, so far • Actions to prop up the banks and stimulate new debt issuance • Government guarantees for bank debt (many countries for 3 or 5 years), covered bonds (Sweden, Ireland, UK), RMBS (UK) • Creating a multiple-tier bond market: government guaranteed (GG) bank debt, GG covered bonds, GG MBS, regular (non-GG) bank debt, legacy covered bonds, legacy ABS and MBS • Loan modifications - self-interest or moral suasion • Additional actions required - social housing, first time buyers, new investors
From one to two markets for structured finance • Government related markets for structured finance bonds • Repo facilities - new issuance price to repo, not priced to market • Potential implementation of government guarantees to RMBS and covered bonds (UK) • Government-guaranteed covered bonds vs. covered bonds from government supported banks • Legacy markets for structured finance products • Secondary markets for ABS and MBS • Secondary markets for covered bonds • Wide spreads for liquidity or credit reasons, or both • Interaction among the different primary markets in the presence of government guarantee • GG bank debt - most attractive pricing but limited maturity (3 or 5 yrs) and size per government support packages (on balance sheet debt) • Covered bonds - attractive pricing for the guaranteed covered bonds but admin cost not justifiable, hence covered bonds attractive for maturities beyond 3/5 years (on balance sheet debt with encumbrance, investor acceptance in light of product disparity) • Securitisation - attractive due to clear asset/liability matching and maturity/ cash flow profile(regulatory issues about retention and capital treatment, structures and asset investor acceptance) • Short-term and long-term distortions and their cure
In Search of New Investors and New Asset Allocation • Remaining traditional investors • Banks - the MtM issue, overload, reinvesting amortisation, tight liquidity, delevering • Insurance companies - 2012 and capital requirement rules • Pension funds - different degree of past involvement • Government guaranteed paper - the SSA investor • Distressed investors • Fixed income funds, alternative credit funds • Timing the entry, sizing the return • ‘Price Distressed’ bonds vs ‘Credit Distressed’ bonds • Challenges in sizing the distressed debt market in Europe • Cross-over investors • Natural fit - private equity investors and CLOs; property investors and CMBS • Tenuous fit - bank equity investors and RMBS/ ABS • Developments and returns on the traditional market of a given investor in comparison with availability and return of structured finance instruments - dividend yield&capital return vs. coupon&principal return
The Asset Allocation Questions • Preferred part of the distressed universe - price vs credit distressed • Fit into the existing allocation guidelines or need to modify guidelines • Availability of the necessary skill set in the organisation • Allocation to fixed income / alternatives / distressed in traditional equity portfolios • Realistic assumptions about equity returns • Ability to use derivatives to hedge or take exposure • Ability to hold investments to maturity
The future of Structured Finance Pros • The need for credit and the inability of banks to provide it from wholesale and deposits • Demographics demand fixed income instruments • Investors preference for secured investment instruments • Availability of skilled structured finance professionals displaced by the upheaval in investment banking • Securitisation as a truly match-funded funding mechanism • Attractive relative value of securitisation and covered bonds post dislocation Cons • Regulatory zeal/ hyperactivity - BIS2.2 and the X% rule • Insufficient investor base • Ambiguity of rating agencies role • Negative publicity surrounding structured finance • Crowding out effect of government guaranteed debt and ‘nationalisation’ of the banks
Expectations for 2009 • De-leveraging and re-capitalisation of banks • Stabilisation or at least sizing the trough of the residential and commercial real estate markets • Sizing the depth of the economic turn in Europe • Reduction of systemic risk in the banking system • Clarity as to the range of measures the governments are prepared to take to support the economies, consumer and corporate sectors, market liquidity and funding availability • Accepting a scenario-based risk-reward approach to investing • Differentiating between price distressed and credit distressed bonds, new and legacy bonds
Sukuk market in picture Global Sukuk issuance (US$bn) GCC Sukuk issuance (US$bn) Source: Zawya, Merrill Lynch, IFIS Source: Zawya, Merrill Lynch, IFIS 5yr FLT, Corporate Sukuk spreads (bps) Source: Zawya, Merrill Lynch, IFIS What Drives European Credit Spreads - 2009
Sukuk market in picture (contd.) Sukuk issuance by country (US$bn) 2007 vs 2008 Sukuk issuance (US$bn) Source: Zawya, Merrill Lynch, IFIS
Sukuk spreads widened and issuance declined • Sukuk spreads widened 2-3 times; • Corporate sukuk priced in the range of 115 – 275bps; Saudi spread declined on GSE issuance • Widening attributed to shariah ruling on asset buy-back in sukuks, contagion from the global economic slow down and uncertainty regarding the peg issue • Issuance declined 58% y-o-y; only Bahraini market kept up with last year’s numbers – local money market instruments in demand • Malaysian local currency sukuk dominated the market with US$5.3bn issuance • Indonesia a new market entrant: US$677mn vs US$44mn (in 2007); fixed rate • Issuance predominantly in local currency • Shariah-compliant syndicated lending continues as an alternate debt supplier
The sukuk controversy • Purchase price guarantee in Musharaka, Mudaraba and Wakala structure declared non-compliant shariah; effectively eliminating principle guarantee • Equity/ownership or securitisation structures preferred • Ijara (sale and lease-back) structure exempted from this restriction • Musharaka and Mudaraba sukuks down to 17% and 5% respectively from 43% to 21% last year; Ijara sukuks up to 54% from 30% in 2007 YoY structural shift in sukuk issuance
Islamic Securitisation • First land securitization in Abu Dhabi and the UAE: Sun Finance Limited • First 100% local currency ABS; true sale with title transfer for asset isolation • Rated Aa3/A3/Baa3 and pricing in at 200/250/350bps over EIBOR • Some of the transaction features include: • Low WA LTV (49%), 42% over-collateralisation, short WA life (21 months) & pre-funded reserve accounts • Strong state participation in Abu Dhabi’s development, registered land ownership & high-rated backup servicer, positive real estate outlook in Abu Dhabi for short-medium term Source: Moody’s
GCC Securitisation: any chance? • Fundamentals:weakening economy and real estate markets; Saudi relatively better • Credit growth: credit growing rapidly, banks’ loan to deposit growth (100% in Qatar, 65% KSA), over-exposure to the real estate sector – need to offload in the capital market • Collateral performance:low non-performing loan ratio supported by strong economic growth; consumer loans exposed to local stock markets (esp. KSA) and real estate; deterioration of assets likely especially the UAE • Demand:local investors and banks; shariah-compliant securitisation to attract Islamic banks; however real estate exposure to be taken with a pinch of salt • Legal issues: untested and evolving legal system; two-tier SPV used so far; free-zones more reliable, replicate English law • Expectations:GCC securitisation to continue; UAE the most developed markets in the GCC; Qatar and Saudi picking up; post-downturn origination to slow down
Consumer & mortgage lending • Total loans (% of GDP):UAE (103%), Qatar (69%), Bahrain (64%), KSA (42%), Egypt (48%) Consumer • Deposits (% of GDP):UAE (103%) and Bahrain (96%) leading, position boosted by offshore financial centres • Retails loans:Highest retail loans in Qatar and Bahrain, UAE lagging (6% of GDP) • Private consumption rising; credit card market growing – UAE accounts for 50% Mortgage • Mortgage penetration low across the board; UAE (8%) and Kuwait (10%) top the list • Increasing housing costs to support mortgage growth • Legal infrastructure needs clarity
Market in numbers • Jumbo market at the end of 2008 compared with the end of 2007 • Annual gross supply: €90bn versus €152bn • Share of special-law-based covered bonds 17% versus 37% • Share of mortgage covered bonds 64% versus 66% • Total volume outstanding: €823bn versus €821bn • Share of special-law-based covered bonds 20% versus 23% • Share of mortgage covered bonds 60% versus 56% • Number of Jumbos issued: 66 versus 99 • Number of Jumbo issuers: 97 versus 80 • Number of products issued in Jumbo format: 24 versus 21 • New special covered bond laws: 2 versus 4 • Jumbo redemptions: €87bn versus €80bn • Initial maturities of new Jumbos: • up to 5 years 89% versus 50% • 6 to 10 years 11% versus 35% • over 10 years 0% versus 18%
Challenges • What place do covered bonds have in a bank’s overall funding mix? • Banks adjust their balance sheets and refinancing strategies • Originate-to-retain and originate-to-repo process is in vogue • Secured funding implies structural subordination • Term funding has to gain importance over time • How will the investor base develop and grow? • The development of a domestic investor base becomes crucial • The risk assessment of covered bonds has become more complex • How will the pricing of covered bonds develop? • From a ‘rates plus’ product to a ‘credit minus’ product to an in-between product • Exceptional competition from government-guaranteed bank debt
Challenges • Will the spread differentiation by country and issuer stay? • Covered bonds have suffered from a sharp liquidity decline and widening spreads • Spread differentiation between countries and issuers has reached all-time wides • Spread differentiation and risk aversion go hand-in-hand • Flight-to-safety and flight-to-liquidity flows to put upward pressure on spreads • Potential issuer downgrades negatively affect the Jumbo spread performance • Subdued gross supply and €100bn in redemptions should support Jumbo spreads • Spread differentiation by country and issuer to stay • Gradual spread contraction in the longer term
Comeback • The 2009 comeback of covered bonds • Exceptional market conditions have stemmed the flow of new Jumbo issuance • Financing markets have to stabilise and investor risk aversion needs to ease • Banks need a variety of funding instruments and matched refinancing • Banks have to wean themselves off current exceptional government support • The covered bond market dynamics are not fully divorced from the credit market • The reception of a covered bond depends on an issuer’s reputation with investors • An overhaul of the market-making system to restore investor confidence • Combined efforts from the different covered bond market stakeholders
UK house prices continue south UK house prices implied by property derivatives UK House price index, YOY change Source: Merrill Lynch Source: Halifax, Nationwide, Land Registry, Merrill Lynch
House sales and mortgage approvals drop Volume of UK house sales UK Mortgage approvals (000s) Source: Land Registry Source: Datastream
Net lending at depressed levels UK Gross mortgage lending by purpose of loan, £mn UK Net and gross mortgage lending (£mn) Source: CML Source: Datastream
UK RMBS volumes at record high, on paper UK RMBS issuance by sector, EURbn Source: Merrill Lynch
UK RMBS secondary market gets more distressed UK Prime and BTL RMBS indicative secondary spreads UK NCF RMBS indicative secondary spreads UK AAA Prime RMBS basis Source: Merrill Lynch
UK Prime RMBS 90+ arrears 90+ arrears before and in 2008, against pool seasoning Source: ABSXchange, Merrill Lynch
UK prime RMBS outlook negative • Macro outlook suggests more pain ahead • Unemployment to reach 8% by 2010 • Losses may reach 2% • Downside risk, but UK government initiatives may be a significant supporting factor • Divergence in performance across master trusts likely to remain • Extension risk rising • Weaker housing market= lower CPR • Step-up calls: not that punitive anymore • Reputational considerations getting weaker
UK buy-to-let market YOY change in number of new tenancies (not renewals) signed up in the last 3 months BTL gross and net lending % BTL investor respondents expecting to buy more properties in the next 12 months Is there more properties or tenants (% respondents)? Source: CML, ARLA Surveys
UK BTL rental yields Average rental return on houses, by region Average rental return on flats, by region Source: ARLA Surveys Source: ARLA Surveys
UK BTL arrears rising BTL sector performance UK BTL 90+ arrears by deal, Oct-08 vs Dec-07 Source: CML Source: ABSXchange, Merrill Lynch
while CPRs slowing UK BTL CPR, Oct-08 vs Dec-07 Aire Valley 90+ arrears, before 2008 versus 1-3Q08 Source: ABSXchange, Merrill Lynch Source: Merrill Lynch
UK BTL risk exposure vary across deals UK BTL current indexed* LTV UK BTL share of fixed-rate mortgages and below 120% ICR Source: ABSXchange, Merrill Lynch *As reported in investor reports, using Halifax index Source: ABSXchange, Merrill Lynch
UK non-conforming RMBS arrears UK NCF 90+ arrears UK NCF 180+ arrears Source: Merrill Lynch, ABSXchange Source: Merrill Lynch, ABSXchange
UK NCF RMBS repossessions UK NCF REO, % current balance UK NCF quarterly repossession rate, % current balance Source: Merrill Lynch, ABSXchange Source: Merrill Lynch, ABSXchange, investor reports
UK NCF RMBS losses UK NCF cumulative losses, % original balance UK NCF deals with 2009 resets*, % original balance Source: Merrill Lynch, ABSXchange Source: Merrill Lynch, ABSXchange, investor reports *Excludes deals where the amount of resets is less than 10% of original balance
UK non-conforming RMBS series UK NCF 90+ arrears and repossessions versus risk factors, by vintage and series*
UK NCF RMBS CPRs UK NCF CPR Gap between 3M Libor and BBR (%) Source: Merrill Lynch, ABSXchange Source: Bloomberg
European GDP and unemployment Quarterly GDP growth 2000-Q3 08 (YoY%) Quarterly unemployment rates 2000-Q3 08 (%) Source: Datastream Source: Datastream