1 / 7

Presented by Jiyoon Chung

Pacheco de Almeida, Goncalo, James E. Henderson, and Karel D. Cool (2008). Resolving the commitment versus flexibility trade-off: The role of resource accumulation lags. Academy of Management Journal , 51 (3): 517-536. . Presented by Jiyoon Chung. Overview.

jiro
Download Presentation

Presented by Jiyoon Chung

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Pacheco de Almeida, Goncalo, James E. Henderson, and Karel D. Cool (2008). Resolving the commitment versus flexibility trade-off: The role of resource accumulation lags. Academy of Management Journal, 51 (3): 517-536. Presented by Jiyoon Chung

  2. Overview • Research question: How does time-consuming resource accumulation influence the classic strategy trade-off between commitment and flexibility? • Resource accumulation lags favoring commitment • Resource accumulation lags favoring flexibility

  3. Theory and Hypotheses • The opportunity cost of postponing investment can be substantially higher, including the profits forsaken while the firm is accumulating resources to enter the desired market. • Hypothesis 1: Ceteris paribus, resource accumulation lags have a positive effect on a firm’s likelihood of investment. • Longer resource accumulation lags increase the profit potential of an investment project more than its loss potential  a positive interaction effect between uncertainty and time lag • Hypothesis 2: Ceteris paribus, resource accumulation lags reduce the main negative effect of uncertainty (the option value of waiting) on a firm’s likelihood of investment.

  4. Theory and Hypotheses • With very long resource accumulation lags, • The risk of widespread bandwagons is high, and • Managers have more incentives to make smaller-scale investments because of short-term stock market pressures. • Hypothesis 3: Ceteris paribus, very long resource accumulation lags have a negative effect on a firm’s likelihood of investment.

  5. Research Design • Dependent variable: • Investment • Explanatory variables: • Resource accumulation lag • Demand uncertainty • Control variables: • Demand growth • Excess capacity • Investment lumpiness • Market share • Rivals’ expansion Estimation methods

  6. Results H1 H3 H2 H1, H2, H3 are all corroborated

  7. Conclusion • In industries with lengthy resource accumulation lags, competitive advantage may be difficultto attain (but easier to sustain). • The results contradict the view that uncertainty is always a strong disincentive for investment. • An increase in uncertainty may encourage rather than dissuade commitment, owing to the positive moderating effect of resource accumulation lags on uncertainty. • The non-linear inverted U-shaped effect of resource accumulation lags on commitment implies that flexibility is more valued in industries in which resource accumulation is either very time-consuming or virtually instantaneous.

More Related