1 / 21

Territorial and urban dimension

This informal dialogue explores the significant and increasing regional disparities in terms of unemployment rate and economic development dynamics. It focuses on forming regional growth poles, addressing weak areas, and supporting economically weak regions and regions with high unemployment rates. The dialogue also highlights the territorial dimension and objectives for addressing these disparities.

jjhonson
Download Presentation

Territorial and urban dimension

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Informal Dialogue with the European Commission Territorial and urban dimension

  2. Informal Dialogue with the European Commission March 20, 2013, Prague Regionaldisparities

  3. regional disparities among regions are significant in terms of unemployment rate and economic development dynamics significant and increasing regional disparities inside individual regions tendencies for creating poles of growth (in economic centres) forming of regional centres rather than regional axes weak and problem areas emerged – “inner peripheries” (economically weak areas inside well prospering regions, alongside regional borders) a successful (favorable) regional development of metropolitan areas can conceal some problems in specific areas at lower level (when assessing regional level) deepening of regional disparities at subregional level regions with concentrated state support economically weak regions and regions with high unemployment rate lagging behind regional average (as to economic development) Informal Dialogue with the European Commission March 20, 2013, Prague Regionaldisparities

  4. GDP per capita in regions (2010) CZ = index 100 Informal Dialogue with the European Commission March 20, 2013, Prague GDP per capita

  5. GDP (Municipalities with extended powers) expert analysis Informal Dialogue with the European Commission March 20, 2013, Prague GDP per capita

  6. Informal Dialogue with the European Commission March 20, 2013, Prague Index of regional competitiveness

  7. Informal Dialogue with the European Commission March 20, 2013, Prague IndexofCompetitiveness of Municipalities with extended powers

  8. Informal Dialogue with the European Commission March 20, 2013, Prague Migration balance

  9. Informal Dialogue with the European Commission March 20, 2013, Prague Unemployment rate – municipalities with extended powers

  10. Classification of CR municipalities by size groups Informal Dialogue with the European Commission March 20, 2013, Prague Settlement structure

  11. Informal Dialogue with the European Commission March 20, 2013, Prague Territorial typology oftheCzechRepublic

  12. Developing areas Metropolitan areas (areas with concentration above 300,000 inhabitants) Agglomerations – (concentration 100,000 – 300,000) Regional centres (incl. surroundings) – 25,000 – 100,000 Stabilized areas – not belonging to agglomerations and regional centres (and their surroundings) and peripheral areas Peripheral areas – geographically remote areas with a long-term accumulation of problems (borders areas, mountain areas, „inner peripheries“ or areas with specific issues). Informal Dialogue with the European Commission March 20, 2013, Prague Territorial typology oftheCzechRepublic

  13. Criteria: GDP unemployment rate indebtedness benefits in material needs migration balance Informal Dialogue with the European Commission March 20, 2013, Prague Regions with state aid

  14. Informal Dialogue with the European Commission March 20, 2013, Prague Socialexcludedlocalities – potentialofsocialexclusion

  15. to substantially reduce the differences in the socio-economic level of the Czech regions; to contribute to the utilization of the Czech regional potential; to strengthen local competitiveness of regions, cities and municipalities; to support long-term development of labor market; to improve conditions for sustainable and balanced development and the quality of life in the CR; to increase the resource efficiency in achieving ESIF objectives based on territorial-oriented actions/interventions; to effectively promote regional and local development based on the principles of partnership and multi-level governance; to strengthen the urban-rural linkages. Informal Dialogue with the European Commission March 20, 2013, Prague Territorialdimensionobjectives

  16. Territorial Dimension setting markedly different in individual (Operational) Programmes NUTS II and III level and particularly at lower administration level Common principles: thematic (sectoral) territorial integrated Informal Dialogue with the European Commission March 20, 2013, Prague Approaches to TD

  17. Scheme of Territorial Dimension

  18. by defining axis, priorities/actions where territorial principle (based on typology) will be applied (i. e. actions mainly in selected types of regions) by defining axis, priorities/actions where territorial principle will partly be applied – percentage ratio for selected types of regions to all territorial scope by setting contribution to integrated principle – define tools (instruments) and mechanisms that secure coordination among ESIF + determine financial allocation of OP/priority axis… (specific calls for proposal focused on projects within integrated strategies by defining different types of territory (protected landscape areas) and modification of evaluative (assessment) criteria and types of criteria by representation of regional partners within coordination role, main target groups or beneficiaries Informal Dialogue with the European Commission March 20, 2013, Prague Thematicprinciple

  19. Result from typology of Regional Development Strategy of the CR 2014 – 2020: Type A: focus on developing potential Developing areas Metropolitan areas (areas with concentration above 300,000 inhabitants) Agglomerations – (concentration 100,000 – 300,000) Regional centres (incl. surroundings) – 25,000 – 100,000 Stabilized areas – not belonging to agglomerations and regional centres (and their surroundings) and peripheral areas Peripheral areas – geographically remote areas with a long-term accumulation of problems (borders areas, mountain areas, inner peripheries or areas with specific issues). plus Type B : focus on regions supported by state regions supported by the state (regions with economic problem, social exluded areas) Informal Dialogue with the European Commission March 20, 2013, Prague Thematicprinciple

  20. based on relevant instruments preliminary proposal: ITI – metropolitan areas (fulfilment of 5% of sustainable urban development requirement) ITDP – developing areas, regions supported by the state --- successor of IUDP CLLD – based on the Rural development programme aimed at peripheral areas priority and selected stabilized areas, supported also by other thematic OPs … Informal Dialogue with the European Commission March 20, 2013, Prague Integratedprinciple

  21. Informal Dialogue with the European Commission March 20, 2013, Prague Scheme of the integrated instruments

More Related