1 / 50

The Promise of Telecommuting Ted Balaker Reason Foundation rppi

Learn why telecommuting is a successful commute mode, reducing traffic delays significantly and offering a cost-effective alternative compared to transit. Explore the future of telecommuting amid societal trends.

jlacroix
Download Presentation

The Promise of Telecommuting Ted Balaker Reason Foundation rppi

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Promise of Telecommuting Ted Balaker Reason Foundation www.rppi.org

  2. Policymakers have been frustrated with the American people for decades. • They’ve tried just about everything to pry us out of our SUVs and sedans.

  3. Ride the bus

  4. Ride rail

  5. Walk and Bike

  6. But nothing seems to work

  7. Meanwhile, transit spends more, does less.

  8. Transit’s Change in Subsidies and Work-Trip Market Share(1980-2000)

  9. How about carpooling? • If you won’t get out of your car, at least put more people in it. • 2400 miles of carpool lanes. • PSAs make carpooling look like lots of fun.

  10. But carpooling is like transit … More carpool lanes, but less carpool commuting.

  11. More carpool lanes, less carpool commuting(1980-2000)

  12. Only commute modes to increase share since 1980 … • Driving alone • Telecommuting (Work at Home)

  13. Change in Commute Share(1980-2000)

  14. Definitional Squabbles • Some say you can’t call “Work at Home” workers telecommuters. • Some “Work at Homers” are home-based and some say home-based workers aren’t really telecommuters. • But if they couldn’t work at home would they just stop working? • Central question: Does the work arrangement help decrease peak hour congestion? • Home based workers might be the ultimate tcers.

  15. Why telecommuting’s performance is impressive …

  16. Growth • TC is only commute mode besides driving alone to increase since 1980. • Greatest percent increase. • Widespread growth. • Big increase in every metro area.

  17. Wait a minute! TC’s market share was small to begin with, so it had lots of room for growth. Yes, but …

  18. You could say the same about transit and carpooling. • Both lost market share. • They also had public policy on their side. • Policy often hampers TC, but it has grown anyhow.

  19. Why telecommuting’s performance is impressive …

  20. Impact • TC is gaining ground on transit, poised to surpass it. • Remove transit anomaly NY and telecommuters already outnumber transit commuters. • TCers outnumber transit commuters in MOST metro areas.

  21. Impact • Areas where TCers outnumber transit commuters by at least 2 to 1: Charlotte, Raleigh, Indianapolis, Tampa, Kansas City, Greensboro, West Palm Beach, Nashville, Grand Rapids • In Oklahoma City, TCers outnumber transit commuters by nearly 5 to 1.

  22. What about rail transit?

  23. Telecommuting vs. Rail • In areas with rail, rail commuters outnumber TCers in only 5 cases. (NY, Chicago, DC, Philly, Boston) • San Francisco has more telecommuters than rail commuters. • In Portland, telecommuters outnumber rail commuters by more than 9 to 1. • In San Diego, it's 22 to 1.

  24. But wait! TCers may avoid the work trip, but maybe they increase congestion by making more non-work trips.

  25. Nope • According to a review of TC literature ... • Most studies find that TC significantly reduces trips and VMT. • TC reduced trips by 27 to 51% • TC reduced VMT by 53 to 77% (source: Resources for the Future)

  26. According to an analysis of D.C. area commuting … • Traffic delays would drop by 10% for every 3% of commuters who work from home. (Source: Laurie Schintler, George Mason University)

  27. Why telecommuting’s performance is impressive…

  28. Cost-effectiveness Transit vs. Telecommuting • Impact is similar. • What about cost? • There are costs associated with tc (computer, internet access, etc.). • But these costs almost never fall to the taxpayer. • On the other hand, transit is heavily subsidized. • Bottom Line: Telecommuting offers more bang for the buck.

  29. Cost to Taxpayer: Transit vs. TC(2000)

  30. Findings like these aren’t surprising. • UC Davis study: • Compared to transit “telecommuting appears to be far more cost-effective in terms of public sector expenditures.” • George Mason University study: • Telecommuting is “one of the easiest things we can do” to reduce traffic delays.

  31. Let’s look to the future.

  32. The future will frustrate policymakers even more. • Wealth is increasing … • Compared to today, workers in 1920 had to work 3 X as long to buy a car. • Today there are more cars than licensed drivers. • Even 80% of poor households own at least one car. • Increased wealth brings … • More cars, more travel. • Decentralization of housing and employment centers. • Bottom line: With countless origin and destination points, it’s difficult for transit to be relevant.

  33. Should policy fight social trends? • Policymakers want to fight decentralization. • But this trend is stronger than policy. • Happening everywhere. • Even in foreign cities with higher gas prices, higher densities, and more transit service. • Still want to fight this trend? You’ll spend lots of money and lose.

  34. Telecommuting can work with social trends. • Telecommuting can accommodate a decentralizing society. • Location doesn’t matter much, usually only need a few tools (computer, cell phone, internet). • And there are other reasons to be optimistic about the future of telecommuting.

  35. Reason for optimism … Telecommuting tools continue to improve.

  36. Telecommuting tools continue to improve. • Perform better, cost less. • Since technological progress is gradual we rarely step back to appreciate how revolutionary it has been.

  37. Computers • 1970s IBM mainframes: $3.5 M • Today’s PCs • $500 • 1000 times faster

  38. Cell phones • The first cell phones were huge. • Cost thousands of dollars. • Today they’re tiny and companies give them away.

  39. High Speed Internet Access

  40. Reason for Optimism: Telecommuting-friendly jobs are growing.

  41. Telecommuting-friendly jobs are growing. • Shifting to a knowledge-based economy. • BLS expects tech sector to yield 7 of top 10 fastest growing professions.

  42. Reason for optimism … Workers like telecommuting.

  43. Workers like telecommuting. • 77% of AT&T TCers are happier with career after starting telecommuting. • TC helps Sun Microsystems attract and retain good workers. • Some surveys show that workers will choose the ability to telecommute over a higher salary.

  44. Workers like telecommuting. • Important for policymakers. • They can stop trying to force commuters to do what they don’t want to do. • Particularly significant for rail projects. • Rail is expensive, but transit officials think it’s the only way to attract “choice” riders.

  45. Who are these “choice” riders? • Compared to transit users in general they’re wealthier, better educated car owners. • Who are telecommuters? • Wealthy, educated car owners. • Instead of trying to get choice riders out of their cars why not ask them to just stay home?

  46. Telecommuting is an easier sell. • It’s faster. • Average roundtrip commute … • Transit: 96 min. • Telecommuting: 0 min. • Workers already like it. • It’s cheap. • Allow transit to focus on serving the poor.

  47. Still, rail has one big advantage over telecommuting.

  48. Better photo ops.

  49. Questions? Comments? ted.balaker@reason.org

More Related