1 / 14

National Budget 2005/06

This presentation by the Institute for Public Policy Research delves into the fiscal framework, revenue, expenditure trends, and offers recommendations based on MTEF framework analysis. It highlights discrepancies between forecasted and actual revenues, expenditures, and deficits. The presentation questions spending targets and reductions, emphasizing the need for accurate forecasting. Conclusions urge a focus on spending under the Ministry of Finance's control and provide insights into revenue and expenditure highlights. The presentation concludes with recommendations for both revenue and spending aspects to optimize budget management.

jmackay
Download Presentation

National Budget 2005/06

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. National Budget 2005/06 A presentation by the Institute for Public Policy Research 16 May 2005

  2. Budget presentation • MTEF fiscal framework • Revenue • Expenditure • Recommendations

  3. Fiscal targets * Excludes loan guarantees and other contingent liabilities

  4. MTEF framework

  5. Points to note • Actual revenues look to be higher than forecast revenues (with the exception of 2003/04) • Actual expenditures look to be higher than forecast expenditures • Actual budget deficits look to be higher than forecast for 2001/02, lower than forecast for 2002/03, far higher than forecast for 2003/04 and higher for the latest MTEF for 2004/05. • The latest four MTEFs (2002/03-2005/06) have all forecast declining revenue, expenditure and deficit but there is no sign that this is taking place. • In spite of introducing a spending target of 30% of GDP in November 2001 spending remains at or above 35% of GDP.

  6. Questions • Is spending target really 30% of GDP or lower? • Will spending really fall by 5% of GDP in next two years? • Is reduction in spending due to limited revenues or due to belief in economic benefits? • Does MTEF framework boost credibility and reduce uncertainty?

  7. Conclusions • MTEF has not presented accurate picture of future revenue and expenditure • Spending stuck at 35% of GDP • MoF does not achieve targets so why should anyone else? • Focus on spending under MoF’s control

  8. Revenue highlights • 25% increase in income tax? • Non-mining corporate tax doubled in five years? • Mining royalty tax? • Parastatal dividend policy? • Halving of diamond royalties? • Contribution of land tax?

  9. Revenue highlights • Non-tax revenue down by 25% (tax revenues up by 4%)? • Miscellaneous N$121.8 million under Defence? • Park entrance fees down by N$3 million? • No sale of GRN houses?

  10. Expenditure highlights • MTEF vs budget eg. Vote 01 • Combatting of crime down • Defence up • Reduction in primary education and health care • Social welfare?

  11. Expenditure highlights – defence spending

  12. Expenditure highlights • AALs interest and arrears • Ostrich industry subsidies • N$50 million to land purchases (only N$3.9 million spent in 2003/04!) • N$53 million for Film and Video

  13. Recommendations - revenues • Don’t raise tax revenue just because you can • Don’t introduce new taxes until existing taxes fully exploited • Don’t spring tax surprises on economy • Don’t state vague intentions to introduce new taxes • Don’t use monopoly parastatals to raise revenue • Aim to reduce corporate tax rate and eliminate special tax incentives • Focus on non-tax revenues

  14. Recommendations - spending • Limit spending on unproductive items • Focus spending on productive items • Reform must precede more spending on education • Increase spending on cash transfers • Streamline structures to reduce spending • Benefits of achieving spending target

More Related