1 / 34

Accountable Care for Low-income and Marginalized Populations

Accountable Care for Low-income and Marginalized Populations. Baylor Health Care System Office of Health Equity July 9, 2010. Purpose. Describe the development of a hospital-linked “Community Care Service Line” and the emerging Accountable Care Organizational (ACO) strategy

joan-craft
Download Presentation

Accountable Care for Low-income and Marginalized Populations

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Accountable Care for Low-income and Marginalized Populations Baylor Health Care System Office of Health Equity July 9, 2010

  2. Purpose • Describe the development of a hospital-linked “Community Care Service Line” and the emerging Accountable Care Organizational (ACO) strategy • Expanding Capacity • Expanding Access • Improving Quality

  3. The Context – Community Demographic Changes • Dallas County (2006) • 9th largest in U.S. (Pop. - 2,307,502) • Hispanics = 36.8% • AAs = 20.1% • Whites = 37% • 27.8% Uninsured Rate (National-15.9%) • 40.4% Medically Indigent (<200% fpl) • 932,231 people • 270,346 (29%) - Medicaid/CHIP (33% est. in 2020) • 661,885 (71%) - Uninsured Dallas County Community Health Checkup, 2007. Prepared by Parkland Health & Hospital System under the auspices of the Dallas/Fort Worth Hospital Council

  4. The Context – Post-reform Health Care System Responses • Increasing Government-sponsored care losses for hospitals – 1-2% per year • Medicare – Avg. $0.12 on every dollar spent • Medicaid – Avg. $0.35 on every dollar spent • Limited cost-shifting to managed care • Increased negotiating power of health plans • Reduced investment income • Physician practices closing to new Medicare/Medicaid patients • Investing in profitable office-based ancillary services Kaufman, N. Bracing for the Failures of Incremental Health Care Reform, April 2010.

  5. The Context – “Skating to where the puck is going to be” – Wayne Gretsky • Physician engagement strategies • New collaborative relationships • Investing funds to stabilize MD incomes generated from improvements in care efficiency • Cost control strategies – “Breakeven on M/C” • Labor, RX and Device supply costs • Unnecessary duplication & variation • Adding costs strategically – “Innovation” • HIT, Patient-centered medical homes, revenue cycle management, hospitalists, care coordination, ACO, etc. Kaufman, N. Bracing for the Failures of Incremental Health Care Reform, April 2010.

  6. ACO: First ACO Steps – Reducing Health Disparities & Bad Debt Emergence of the Community Care Service Line A hospital-safety net clinic collaboration strategy for targeted (i.e. chronically ill) low income & marginalized populations The Community Care Model Innovation to reduce utilization & costs while reducing disparities and increasing quality (e.g. Accountable Care) Market changes demand better alignment Community Benefit Best Practice Stricter 990 reporting requirements Impending growth of Medicaid population Limited Primary & Specialty Care provider capacity Falling hospital reimbursement rates Expanding need for cost reduction innovations Increased competition around hospital quality

  7. Definition • Accountable Care Organization • “A provider-led organization whose mission is to manage the full continuum of care and be accountable for the overall costs and quality of care for a defined population” • ACO - Multiple forms: • Large integrated delivery systems • Physician-hospital organizations • Multispecialty practice groups • Independent practice associations • Virtual inter-dependent networks of hospitals, physicians & clinics Reference: Rittenhouse, Shortell, Fisher – N.Engl.J.Med 2009; 361: 2301-03.

  8. “Starting with a vision”A Community Care Service LineConceptual Framework

  9. “Building community-based ambulatory care capacity”Strategy #1: Aligning with Patient-Centered Medical Homes

  10. Community Care’s Asset Map • Hospital-based residency clinics • Hospital-based chronic disease clinics • Diabetes, Heart Failure, Asthma • Community-based Primary Care • FQHCs • Charitable Clinics • Private Physicians • Specialty Care & RX Access Programs • Project Access

  11. What is the Service Area for PAD – Health Information Exchange? 6 Major Health Care Systems: Baylor HCA Methodist Parkland THR UTSWMC 2000+ Volunteer physicians 10 Charity Clinics Strategic Alignment: Charity Clinics & Hospitals

  12. Alignment with Local Safety Net Charity Clinics • Affiliated with Services Agreements • Central Dallas Ministries – Community Health Services • Christ Family Clinic • Hope Clinic of Garland • Irving Interfaith Health Center • Wholly-owned • Baylor Family Medicine @ Worth St. • Diabetes Health & Wellness Family Health Ctr.

  13. Community Care Service Line Proposed Budget Increase – FY11 :

  14. Community Care Service Line Patient Capacity – FY11 ~2,700 New Patients get a medical home in FY-11 *Assumes Patient Panel Size of 1,000 patients per FTE Provider: ACMPE Paper, Determining Provider Panel Size in a Staff-model HMO, 2006. ** Central Dallas Ministries has an average of 6.15 visits per patient annually, compared to an HMO benchmark of 3.3 visits per patient ***Both Clinics recruit volunteer providers to expand PCP capacity

  15. Community Care Service Line: Increased hospital-to-medical home connections Dedicated Transitional Health Navigators enroll eligible patients from Baylor hospitals, establishing medical homes at partnering clinics. ~1,150 Unassigned hospitalized patients get a medical home in FY-11

  16. Hospital Referrals

  17. Hospital Referrals Capture Rate - % of Referrals Seen for CHSC Notes: n = the number of hospital referrals in that month that have been seen at the clinic at some point (does not include Low Acuity Referrals) Johns Hopkins Study: T. Gary, PhD, et al, The Effects of a Nurse Case Manager and a CHW Team on Diabetic Control, Emergency Department Visits, and Hospitalizations Among urban African Americans with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Arch Intern Med, Oct 26, 2009, (57% referral to patient conversion).

  18. Hospital Referrals Capture Rate - % of Referrals Seen by Clinic Notes: n = the number of hospital referrals in that month that have been seen at the clinic at some point (does not include Low Acuity Referrals) Johns Hopkins Study: T. Gary, PhD, et al, The Effects of a Nurse Case Manager and a CHW Team on Diabetic Control, Emergency Department Visits, and Hospitalizations Among urban African Americans with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Arch Intern Med, Oct 26, 2009, (57% referral to patient conversion).

  19. Productivity: CDM • *Note: Benchmark: 25% MGMA per 1 FTE • Physician (w/o OB): 3787 per Year / 316 per Month • Nurse Practitioner: 1590 per Year / 132 per Month

  20. Productivity: Worth St. • *Note: Benchmark: 25% MGMA per 1 FTE • Physician (w/o OB): 3787 per Year / 316 per Month • Nurse Practitioner: 1590 per Year / 132 per Month

  21. Patient ExperiencePress Ganey – Overall Mean Score *Survey Data by Discharge/Service Date

  22. Outcomes: Quality Improvement • *Note: • Percent Opportunity Achieved (POA) = The sum of the services provided (or completed, i.e. "done") divided by the total services applicable to the patient

  23. Baylor’s Community Care Service Line Budget Management (FY-10) *Note: 1Total Expense from Cash Financials (3380) 2Represents Revenue Brought In (i.e. Project Access Dallas, Clinic, or OHE) *Revenue of $22,719 Pending, for total of $30,801 in FY’10 Budget (Variance= 19,393 ; % Variance = 63.0%)

  24. “There is a return on investment”Impacting Hospital Utilization, Uncompensated Costs & Quality

  25. Outcomes: Reduced Uncompensated Hospital Care Costs Avoided $5,547 per patient in hospital costs 79.9% Reduction 61.4% Increase * At the end of CY-09, Total Patient Panel = 2,300 x $5,547 saved per patient in first year = $12,758,100 in avoided hospital costs *Note: Hospital Utilization data provided my BHCS Decision Support / Revenue Cycle. Analysis includes patients with a 1st Date of Service at Worth St. on or before 12/21/08 with hospital utilization data through 12/21/09.

  26. Baylor’s Community Care Service Line–ROIBaylor Family Medicine @ Worth Street12 Month Pre and Post Enrollment Projected # of Worth St. Patients Utilizing Hospital in 12-mo period: 1,681 86.1% of Worth pts experienced hospital utilization (matched in database) 1,953 pts seen at Worth St. in past 12 mo (January ’09 – December ’09) Average Savings per Pt from avoided hospital utilization (Uncompensated Costs):$5,607 12-mo Pre-Initiation: Avg. Uncompensated Costs per Pt = $8,121 12-mo Post-Initiation: Avg. Uncompensated Costs per Pt = $2,514 Projected Savings for 1,681 Worth Street patients (Uncompensated costs): $9,425,367 $5,607 savings x 1,681 pts Cost of Worth Street Operations (12 months):($1,162,545) January ’09 – December ‘09 Net Program Benefit (Loss): $8,262,822

  27. Outcomes: Reduced 30-day Post-Discharge Readmission Rate Improving 30-day Readmission Rates 1U.S. Department of Health & Human Services – Hospital Quality Compare. http://www.hospitalcompare.hhs.gov 2 “Hospital 30-Day Heart Failure Readmission Measure Methodology” Submitted by Yale University/Yale-New Haven Hospital Center for Outcomes Research & Evaluation (YNHH-CORE)

  28. “It’s not all about the clinics”Strategy #2: Developing Community Care Coordination

  29. Summary • Community Care Service Line emergence • A hospital-linked “Community Care Service Line” for low income & marginalized populations • Community Care’s model • Innovative collaboration for achieving an accountable care organizational vision • Market changes provide a need for ACO • Community Benefit Best Practice • Stricter 990 reporting requirements • Impending growth of Medicaid population • Limited Primary & Specialty Care capacity for low income patients • Falling hospital reimbursement rates • Expanding need for cost reduction innovations • Increased competition around hospital quality

  30. For More Information: Jim Walton DO, MBA Vice President & Chief Health Equity Officer jameswa@baylorhealth.edu

More Related