1 / 37

Ultimate Storage Rings and the Low Emittance Rings Collaboration

Ultimate Storage Rings and the Low Emittance Rings Collaboration. R. Bartolini Diamond Light Source and John Adams Institute for Accelerator Science University of Oxford. CLIC Workshop 2013 CERN, 31 January 2013. Light sources diffraction limited operation at 0.1nm requires ~ 10 pm.

joanna
Download Presentation

Ultimate Storage Rings and the Low Emittance Rings Collaboration

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Ultimate Storage Rings and the Low Emittance Rings Collaboration R. Bartolini Diamond Light Source and John Adams Institute for Accelerator Science University of Oxford CLIC Workshop 2013 CERN, 31 January 2013

  2. Light sources diffraction limited operation at 0.1nm requires ~10 pm Motivations: the low emittance community Colliders (e.g B-factories) 1036 cm-2 s-1 requires 2nm (5nm for superKEKB) as present state-of-the-art light sources Damping rings 500 pm H and 2 pm V (specs for ILC-DR) <100 pm H and 5 pm V (specs for CLIC-DR) CLIC Workshop 2013 CERN, 31 January 2013

  3. Outline • Present scenario • Low emittance light sources • MAX-IV • large rings projects • medium size rings projects • R&D challenges (reviewed at the USR workshop in Beijing Nov 2012) • AP, magnets, RF, vacuum, Diagnostics, … • The Lowering network CLIC Workshop 2013 CERN, 31 January 2013

  4. Emittance in 3rd GLS, DR and B-factories ~ 2013 Transverse coherence requires small emittance Diffraction limit at 0.1 nm requires 8 pm

  5. Measured emittances and reduced coupling 6 mm rms vertical • With beta-beating < 1%  agreement on measured emittance and energy spread • Emittance [2.78 - 2.74] (2.75) nm • Energy spread [1.1e-3 - 1.0-e3] (1.0e-3) • betatron coupling corrected to ~ 0 using skew-quadrupoles • emittance coupling ~0.08% achieved → vertical emittance ~ 2.0 pm closest tune approach  0 Pinhole camera images before/after coupling correction C. Thomas, R. Bartolini et al. PRSTAB 13, 022805, (2010) Diamond is currently running at reduced coupling 0.3% (8pm V) for users

  6. SLS world record for smallest vertical emittance Courtesy L. Rivkin PSI and EPFL CLIC Workshop 2013 CERN, 31 January 2013

  7. Max-IV 20-fold 7-BA achromat Max-IV studies proved that a 7-BA (330 pm, and 260 pm with DW) can deliver suffcient DA and MA to operate with standard off-axis injection schemes Tools used FM – driving terms Additional octupoles were found to be effective Courtesy S. Leemans

  8. PEP-X 7 bend achromat cell Natural emittance = 29 pm-rad at 4.5 GeV 5 TME units Cell phase advances: mx=(2+1/8) x 3600, my=(1+1/8) x 3600. Courtesy B. Hettel, Y. Cai CLIC Workshop 2013 CERN, 31 January 2013

  9. Reduced emittance with damping wigglers Emittance = 11 pm-rad at 4.5 GeVwith parameters lw=5 cm, Bw=1.5 T Wiggler Field Optimization Wiggler Length Optimization Average beta function at the wiggler section is 12.4 meter. Courtesy Min-Huey Wang, B. Hettel, Y. Cai CLIC Workshop 2013 CERN, 31 January 2013

  10. Additional sextupoles for tuneshift and 2Qx-2Qy Without Harmonic Sextupoles With Harmonic Sextupoles Optimized with OPA (Accelerator Design Program from SLS PSI) 10 mm DA achieved Courtesy Min-Huey Wang, B. Hettel, Y. Cai CLIC Workshop 2013 CERN, 31 January 2013

  11. Multi-bend achromats (x ~ 1/ND3) tUSR – M. Borland A Tevatron-size USR based on a 7BA lattice DA small (~ mm) requires new injection concepts (e.g. low emittance injector for swap out injection) Courtesy M. Borland

  12. A 150pm lattice for a ~20-fold decrease in emittance A 5BA lattice for Diamond-II upgrade 14 quads per cell 14 sextupoles 10 cm distance between magnetic elements CLIC Workshop 2013 CERN, 31 January 2013

  13. Some 5BA solutions from MOGA 2 mm DA Optimisation just started Large tuneshift with amplitude to be compensated Spring8-II, and tUSR have similar DA It is likely that we have to learn to cope with these small DA New injection schemes need to be developed nonlinear pulsed kicker or swap out injection schemes are under investigation CLIC Workshop 2013 CERN, 31 January 2013

  14. Survey of ultra-low emittance lattices

  15. Some open issues on low emittance lattice design What is the optimal energy for a DLSR? tens keV high brilliance (and some at 300 keV) requires > 3 GeV What M is optimal in MBA? longer cells (larger M) produce smaller emittances trade off between small emittances and straight section length What is the optimal length for straight sections? not much interest for very long undulators (SS 5 – 7 m) Ratio circumference vs lengths of IDs straight section still a valid figure of merit Dynamic aperture and lifetime minimise sextupoles strength as much as possible use octupoles for correction detuning with amplitude Optimisation techniques FMA (used everywhere), driving term cancellation (MAX IV, Pep-X, …), MOGA (Diamond, …)

  16. Accelerator Physics: current and instabilities (I) Small emittance  short bunches  low instability thresholds Small apertures everywhere arcs & straight sections is worrying for large stored current IBS; Touschek lifetime Coherent Synchrotron Radiation; Resistive Wall Current limited by IBS, especially for very low emittance lattices Effect of CSR also potentially catastrophic especially for those lattices with short natural bunch length Heat load on beamlines optics can be an issue at large current high beam energies (1.5 A Pep-X old design) but IBS is the limiting factor. Unlikely that ultra low emittance will work with current above few 100s mA. CLIC Workshop 2013 CERN, 31 January 2013

  17. Accelerator Physics: current and instabilities (II) Countermeasures for CSR: vacuum pipe shielding with small apertures was discussed. Relative impact of RW to be worked out Countermeasures for RW and FII: feedback and fill pattern gaps can help Countermeasures: long bunches Choice Ideal RF frequency HHC factor 5 lengthening for MAX IV 70 mm rms bunches Leave out time resolved studies (to the Linac injector) one ring cannot fit everything ! CLIC Workshop 2013 CERN, 31 January 2013

  18. Accelerator engineering: magnets R&D Diffraction limited emittance requires magnets with unprecedented strength in storage ring. High gradient and high precision required New designs under consideration foresee magnets whose strength exceed even the most aggressive existing designs and distance is of the order of the gap quadruple gradient MAX IV has 40.0 T/m ESRF – Diamond-II 100 T/m Spring8-II 80 T/m BAPS 50 T/m  USR 90 T/m quadrupoles in dipoles MAX IV has 9 T/m ESRF – Diamond-II 30 T/m sextupoles MAX IV has 2*2200 T/m2 ESRF-Diamond -USR 7000 T/m2 Spring-8 II 13000 T/m2 BAPS 7500 T/m2 space between magnets (hard edge) 10 cm MAX IV has 7.5 cm Apertures = 20-26 mm diameter in arcs MAX IV inner diam. 22 mm

  19. Quadrupole magnet design with g > 100 T/m (ESRF) EM quadrupole PM quadrupole PM are also envisaged for dipoles due to power consumption and stability

  20. Accelerator Engineering (III) Components Integration: separate magnets on girders or common blocks a la MAX IV ? blocks integration: alignment left to machining not adjustments and pushes the structure eigenfrequencies up above 50 Hz but complicated vacuum pumping requires NEG e.g. vacuum leak requires opening the whole cell CLIC Workshop 2013 CERN, 31 January 2013

  21. Accelerator Engineering: Vacuum Small magnets bore (20-26 mm diameter) required to achieve high gradients creates problem with the vacuum system pumping cross section limited insufficient space for pumps, absorbers, antechambers,… MAX IV solution distributed NEG coating Neg coating Cu chamber with external cooling channel Time consuming for NEG coating (~ 10 days for a vacuum chamber) process Limited coating production capability in the world  long procurement time (costs). Activation system to be considered during the vessel design stage. CLIC Workshop 2013 CERN, 31 January 2013

  22. Injection Crucial aspect for this studies when the low emittance is achieved compromising the DA Traditional 3 or 4 Kicker bump: require 10 mm DA required Top-Up is crucial for sub-um stability Injection transient seems unavoidable; gating needed New scheme emerging are multipole pulsed injection and swap out injection CLIC Workshop 2013 CERN, 31 January 2013

  23. Injection: new schemes Multipole kicker schemes still off-axis: it requires ~5 mm DA (MAX IV data) some R&D still needed but excellent perspective at BESSY-II (BESSY-II data) Swap out injection kick in - on axis - a new bunch and kick out the depleted bunch requires a small emittance injector – can work with 2 mm DA no top up – but fractional replacement of current the injector and the achievable fill pattern limit the total stored current (0.5 nC/bunch) - with a booster or linac CLIC Workshop 2013 CERN, 31 January 2013

  24. Stability and feedback system Stability requirements 10% rules still valid (up to 200 Hz): J.C. Denard’s talk implies no longer submicron stability but 100-200 nm already achieved (or very close) in the V plane in some machines H plane issues – Amplification factor is higher than in V Top-Up mandatory R&D: civil engineering: common slab for ring and experimental hall tunnel temperature control (within 0.1 C) girders’ eigenfrequencies above 50 Hz BPM accuracy: new designs for round pipes; decoupling by bellows; invar supports; better resolution (esp. turn by turn) No revolution is needed but steady improvement on what already achieved

  25. SOLEIL’s orbit feedback perfomance Vertical plane FOFB ON FOFB OFF FOFB OFF FOFB ON Vertical beam motion averaged on all e-BPMs ~300 nm (0.1-500 Hz ) It means 200 nm RMS in the middle of the straight sections J. C. Denard SOLEIL

  26. IDs from J. Chavanne’s talk: ID impact with new low emittance lattice Beam dynamics: will need FF tables correction Photon quality: rms phase errors 2-3 degree is adequate Energy spread will become the dominant effect to higher harmonics Heat load: no major changes as the size of the photon beam is weakly dependent on emittance (mostly depends on K) from J. Bardth’s talk: comparison CMPUs vs SCUs CPMU mature design; SCU higher field for periods above 10 mm SCU have big potential; CMPU still compatible with users application in the next 5-10 years due to flexibility, fast tuning, reproduclbility

  27. R&D IDs: SCU at APS • SCU has been built at the APS • Beff = 0.64 T at 500 A • 21 periods of 16 mm • Installation is scheduled for December 2012 Completed magnet assembly Fit test of cold mass and current lead assemblies in cryostat M. Jaski APS: Ivanyushenkov et al.. IPAC12, CLIC Workshop 2013 CERN, 31 January 2013

  28. Conclusion and open issues Lots of issues – long to-do list but no show stopper Many light source operate with low emittance lattices. Vertical emittance in the 1-2 pm range are no longer uncommon. New projects aim at reaching diffraction limited rings in Horizontal plane as well. These are based on MBA lattices. DA and Touschek lifetime studies are crucial. Magnets and apertures design will be at the cutting edge of present R&D. Alternative injection schemes are under study Collective effects (IBS) will limit the stored current to 100-200 mA. They might be mitigated by Harmonic Cavity for bunch lengthening. Round beams could help and more R&D is needed. However the subject is now seriously tackled by a large community, some rings are already solved (e.g. PEP-X at 10 pm) and new solutions will likely appear for upcoming projects

  29. All presentations in http://indico.ihep.ac.cn/conferenceOtherViews.py?view=standard&confId=2825

  30. Low emittance rings’ collaboration Initiated by the ILC-CLIC working group on damping rings Acknowledging common interests and fostering collaboration among different communities facing very similar problems (both R & D) Two workshop organised: January 2010 – CERN October 2011 – Crete Collaboration now within the EuCARD2 received support for networking activities workshops + reports visits and exchanges on common R & D programmes Approved with 330 kEuros for 4 years – staring May 2013 CLIC Workshop 2013 CERN, 31 January 2013

  31. Work packages and objectives Cooridinators Y. Papahilippou CERN), R.Bartolini (JAI-Diamond), S. Guiducci (INFN) represent the communities of Damping rings, e+/e- colliders, X-ray storage rings. CERN, INFN-LNF and UOXF will coordinate and communicate the network’s activities and results. annual Low Emittance Rings workshop follow up the topical workshops’ outcome. Participation of non-EU members in the board is essential (Accelerator Test Facility - ATF) and USA (Cornell Electron Storage Ring Test Accelerator-CESRTA) Task 6.1. Coordination and Communication Task 6.2. Low Emittance Ring Design (LERD) Task 6.3. Instabilities, Impedances and Collective Effects (IICE) Task 6.4. Low Emittance Rings Technology (LERT) CLIC Workshop 2013 CERN, 31 January 2013

  32. Work packages tasks and organisation – subtask 1 Sub-Task 6.2.1. Optics Design of Low Emittance Rings (ODLER): methods, approaches and numerical tools for designing ultra-low emittance optics in damping rings, storage rings and circular colliders. multi-bend achromats, damping wigglers, dipole magnets with longitudinally variable bending field, or Robinson wigglers Sub-Task 6.2.2. MInimization of Vertical Emittance (MIVE) Hurdles to achieving ultra low emittacne (quantum limit) magnetic error tolerances and alignment of the magnets diagnostics for precise beam size, position and emittance measurement Beam-based correction techniques Experimental work carried out in light sources such as SLS, DIAMOND, Australian Syncrotron, ESRF and test facilities such as ATF and CESRTA. CLIC Workshop 2013 CERN, 31 January 2013

  33. Work packages tasks and organisation – subtask 2 Task 6.3. Instabilities, Impedances and Collective Effects (IICE) This task will be led by SOLEIL. Sub-Task 6.3.1 Impedances and Instabilities in Low Emittance Rings (IILER) low gap chambers, coatings, kickers, RF, etc with shot bunches Sub-Task 6.3.2.Two-Stream Instabilities in Low Emittance Rings (2-SILER) electron cloud and Fast Ion instabilties – vacuum technology Sub-Task 6.3.3.Particle Scattering in Low Emittance Rings (PASLER): IBS, Touschek scattering Sub-Task 6.3.4.Coherent Synchrotron Radiation Instabilities (CSRI): microbunhing dynamics and countermeasures (shileding) CLIC Workshop 2013 CERN, 31 January 2013

  34. Work packages tasks and organisation – subtask 3 Task 6.4. Low Emittance Ring Technology (LERT) This task will be led by CERN Sub-Task 6.4.1. Insertion Device, Magnet design and Alignment (IDEMA) high gradient, small filed errors, alignment superconducting magnet for high field- high gradients Sub-Task 6.4.2. Instrumentation for Low Emittance (ILE): high resolution BPM (including turn by turn) + orbit feedback ultra small beam sizes Sub-Task 6.4.3 Design of Fast Kicker Systems (DEFKIS): fast kickers – 50 Hz stable to 10–4; long flat top 100 ns – of faster for ILC Sub-Task 6.4.4 RF Design (RFDE) RF desing, HOM damping, efficiency,and RF power sources CLIC Workshop 2013 CERN, 31 January 2013

  35. Work packages deliverable Organisation of annual general workshop Organisation of subgroup workshop Interim reports (month 18) D6.1 Low Emittance Ring Design interim report - month 18 D6.2 Instabilities, Impedances and Collective Effects interim report – month 18 D6.3 Low Emittance Ring Technology interim report – month 18 Final reports (month 46) D6.4 Low Emittance Ring Design final report– month 46 D6.5 Instabilities, Impedances and Collective Effects final Report – month 46 D6.6 Low Emittance Ring Technology final report – month 46 CLIC Workshop 2013 CERN, 31 January 2013

  36. Storage ring as damping ring test beds • Ring achieving lowest possible emittances in all three dimensions, in the range of few Gev. Vertical and longitudinal easier than horizontal • Short bunch train structure similar to damping rings • Bunch spacing of 0.67ns (1.5GHz RF system) should be a good compromise • Space for installing wigglers, kickers (and extraction line), vacuum test areas, RF, instrumentation • Beam conditions for studying IBS, space-charge, low emittance tuning, e-cloud (positrons), fast ion instability, CSR… • High brightness single bunches/trains, small bunch length • Available beam time for experimental tests (Diamond, SLS, …,ANKA soon) CLIC Workshop 2013 CERN, 31 January 2013

  37. 3rd LOWERING workshop in Oxford 8-10 July 2013 Oxford 8-10th July third Lowering meeting CLIC Workshop 2013 CERN, 31 January 2013

More Related