1 / 56

3. The Copernican Revolution and Newton’s Revolution or , The Revolution Revolution:

Astronomy 1001, Sept 2007 – Prof. K. Davidson. 3. The Copernican Revolution and Newton’s Revolution or , The Revolution Revolution: what revolves about what, and why ?. Principal players Nicolaus Copernicus (1473 – 1543) Galileo Galilei (1564 – 1642)

joaquin-perez
Download Presentation

3. The Copernican Revolution and Newton’s Revolution or , The Revolution Revolution:

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Ast 1001 lecture 3 -- 2007 Sept 11 (kd) Astronomy 1001, Sept 2007 – Prof. K. Davidson 3. The Copernican Revolution and Newton’s Revolution or, The Revolution Revolution: what revolves about what, and why?

  2. Ast 1001 lecture 3 -- 2007 Sept 11 (kd) Principal players Nicolaus Copernicus (1473 – 1543) Galileo Galilei (1564 – 1642) Johannes Kepler (1571 – 1630) Isaac Newton (1642 – 1727) Notable supporting roles Thomas Digges (1546 – 1595) Tycho Brahe (1546 – 1601) René Descartes (1596 – 1650)

  3. Ast 1001 lecture 3 -- 2007 Sept 11 (kd) Before Copernicus: GEOCENTRIC universe

  4. Ast 1001 lecture 3 -- 2007 Sept 11 (kd) CLAUDIUS PTOLEMY’s mathematical theory from c. 140 during the Roman Empire: perfect circles, epicycles, etc.

  5. Ast 1001 lecture 3 -- 2007 Sept 11 (kd) COPERNICUS’ theory, around 1530: Heliocentric, but otherwise much like Ptolemy’s universe: celestial sphere, planets moved in perfect circles and epicycles, etc., -- pretty complicated.

  6. Ast 1001 lecture 3 -- 2007 Sept 11 (kd)

  7. Ast 1001 lecture 3 -- 2007 Sept 11 (kd) 1530 – 1610: WHICH WAS RIGHT? Ptolemy’s geocentric universe vs. Copernicus’ heliocentric universe There was no obvious way to decide, until GALILEO and KEPLER settled the question in two very different ways during the years 1600 – 1620.

  8. Ast 1001 lecture 3 -- 2007 Sept 11 (kd) Meanwhile (around 1570?), Thomas Digges realized something tremendously important: If Earth moves around the Sun, then the stars might be like the Sun but very, very far away! -- Infinite space instead of a celestial sphere, and maybe each star has its own planets.

  9. Ast 1001 lecture 3 -- 2007 Sept 11 (kd) GALILEO used small telescopes to make several critical discoveries:

  10. Ast 1001 lecture 3 -- 2007 Sept 11 (kd) 1. The Moon has mountains and surface features, like Earth.

  11. Ast 1001 lecture 3 -- 2007 Sept 11 (kd) 2. Jupiter has four satellites = moons.

  12. Ast 1001 lecture 3 -- 2007 Sept 11 (kd) 3. Venus shows a complete set of phases from “crescent” to “full”. When “full”, it’s obviously much farther away.

  13. Ast 1001 lecture 3 -- 2007 Sept 11 (kd) Galileo’s discoveries: 1. Surface features on the Moon 2. Jupiter’s moons 3. “Full” phases of Venus None of these made sense in Ptolemy’s theory, but they were all perfectly OK in Copernicus’ universe. The phases of Venus are especially decisive.

  14. Ast 1001 lecture 3 -- 2007 Sept 11 (kd) (Parenthetically, mention Galileo’s troubles with the Church – basically a matter of internal politics in the Vatican.)

  15. Ast 1001 lecture 3 -- 2007 Sept 11 (kd) Johannes KEPLER

  16. Ast 1001 lecture 3 -- 2007 Sept 11 (kd)

  17. Ast 1001 lecture 3 -- 2007 Sept 11 (kd)

  18. Ast 1001 lecture 3 -- 2007 Sept 11 (kd) TYCHO BRAHE

  19. Ast 1001 lecture 3 -- 2007 Sept 11 (kd) From 1572 to about 1599, Tycho observed the motions of the planets with far better precision than anyone had ever done before. He had good reasons to doubt BOTH Ptolemy’s and Copernicus’ scenarios. He tried to invent an alternative, the “Tychonic theory”.

  20. Ast 1001 lecture 3 -- 2007 Sept 11 (kd)

  21. Ast 1001 lecture 3 -- 2007 Sept 11 (kd)

  22. Ast 1001 lecture 3 -- 2007 Sept 11 (kd)

  23. Ast 1001 lecture 3 -- 2007 Sept 11 (kd) Kepler started by assuming that Earth moves around the Sun. But he didn’t assume anything about epicycles, or perfect circles. Instead he decided to use trigonometry to find the real path of Mars in space. (Why Mars? -- Because Tycho had observed Mars many, many times over almost 30 years.)

  24. Ast 1001 lecture 3 -- 2007 Sept 11 (kd) Kepler’s triangulation of Mars (1600—1610), using Tycho’s earlier observations

  25. Ast 1001 lecture 3 -- 2007 Sept 11 (kd)

  26. Ast 1001 lecture 3 -- 2007 Sept 11 (kd) In almost 10 years of calculations, Kepler discovered a fact that would have big consequences later: The orbit of Mars is an ellipse with the Sun at one focus. Next we’ll see what this means.

  27. Ast 1001 lecture 3 -- 2007 Sept 11 (kd) AN ELLIPSE IS A FLATTENED CIRCLE.

  28. Ast 1001 lecture 3 -- 2007 Sept 11 (kd) ELLIPSE, continued

  29. Ast 1001 lecture 3 -- 2007 Sept 11 (kd)

  30. Ast 1001 lecture 3 -- 2007 Sept 11 (kd) Two more words: PERIHELION and APHELION

  31. Ast 1001 lecture 3 -- 2007 Sept 11 (kd) Kepler noticed that Mars moves faster near perihelion, slower near aphelion. On closer inspection he found a rule that describes the variations in speed at all times.

  32. Ast 1001 lecture 3 -- 2007 Sept 11 (kd) KEPLER’S SECOND LAW

  33. Ast 1001 lecture 3 -- 2007 Sept 11 (kd) “EQUAL AREAS IN EQUAL TIMES”

  34. Ast 1001 lecture 3 -- 2007 Sept 11 (kd) ( In reality the planets’ orbits are almost circular. Here’s a scale drawing of Mars’ orbit.)

  35. Ast 1001 lecture 3 -- 2007 Sept 11 (kd) Finally, Kepler found a rule that relates the speeds of different planets. IfP = orbital period (“year”) and a = average distance from Sun, then P2/ a3 = the same number for all the planets (but not the Moon)

  36. Ast 1001 lecture 3 -- 2007 Sept 11 (kd) Example --- Earth: P = 1 year, a = 1 AU (“astronomical unit”), P2/ a3 = 1 / 1 = 1.00. Jupiter: P = 11.86 years, a = 5.20 AU, P2/ a3 = 140.7 / 140.6 = 1.00. -- It also works for Mercury, Venus, Mars, and Saturn.

  37. Ast 1001 lecture 3 -- 2007 Sept 11 (kd) KEPLER’S LAWS FOR THE PLANETS 1. Each orbit is an ellipse, with the Sun at one focus* 2. Equal areas in equal times 3. Period squared = radius cubed * (Note: the orbits aren’t aligned)

  38. Ast 1001 lecture 3 -- 2007 Sept 11 (kd) Kepler’s “Rudolphine Tables” -- very accurate predictions

  39. Ast 1001 lecture 3 -- 2007 Sept 11 (kd) KEPLER’S LAWS Why do they work? -- The question that led to modern physics

  40. Ast 1001 lecture 3 -- 2007 Sept 11 (kd) 1620 — 1665: Kepler’s laws were obviously right, but only a few people tried to understand why. In those days, “why?” was almost a new type of question in science.

  41. Ast 1001 lecture 3 -- 2007 Sept 11 (kd) DESCARTES (1596 – 1650): “Vortex” theory

  42. Ast 1001 lecture 3 -- 2007 Sept 11 (kd) Isaac Newton (1642 – 1727)

  43. Ast 1001 lecture 3 -- 2007 Sept 11 (kd) Newton’s crucial “thought experiment” (1665)

  44. Ast 1001 lecture 3 -- 2007 Sept 11 (kd)

  45. Ast 1001 lecture 3 -- 2007 Sept 11 (kd)

  46. Ast 1001 lecture 3 -- 2007 Sept 11 (kd) Brief digression ... AVECTORISAQUANTITYTHAT HASADIRECTIONINSPACE. examples: **POSITION** **VELOCITY** **ACCELERATION**

  47. Ast 1001 lecture 3 -- 2007 Sept 11 (kd)

  48. Ast 1001 lecture 3 -- 2007 Sept 11 (kd)

  49. Ast 1001 lecture 3 -- 2007 Sept 11 (kd) The Moon’s orbit around Earth R = 384000 km = about 60 x (radius of Earth), V = 1160 km/hr = 320 m/s. So the required acceleration toward earth is A = V2/ R = 0.027 cm / s / s.

  50. Ast 1001 lecture 3 -- 2007 Sept 11 (kd) Moon’s acceleration toward Earth is about 0.027 cm / s / s. So what? -- Our acceleration toward Earth is g = 980 cm / s / s. Newton noticed that these have the ratio 3600. 60x farther makes gravity weaker by a factor of 3600x. This is obviously 60 x 60 = 602 !

More Related