1 / 35

Thomas Songer, PhD with acknowledgment to several slides provided by

Introduction to Research Methods In the Internet Era. Introduction to Biostatistics. Inferential Statistics Hypothesis Testing. Thomas Songer, PhD with acknowledgment to several slides provided by M Rahbar and Moataza Mahmoud Abdel Wahab. Key Lecture Concepts.

jocelyn-cleveland
Download Presentation

Thomas Songer, PhD with acknowledgment to several slides provided by

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Introduction to Research Methods In the Internet Era Introduction to Biostatistics Inferential Statistics Hypothesis Testing Thomas Songer, PhD with acknowledgment to several slides provided by M Rahbar and Moataza Mahmoud Abdel Wahab

  2. Key Lecture Concepts • Assess role of random error (chance) as an influence on the validity of the statistical association • Identify role of the p-value in statistical assessments • Identify role of the confidence interval in statistical assessments • Briefly introduce tests to undertake 2

  3. Research Process Research question Hypothesis Identify research design Data collection Presentation of data Data analysis Interpretation of data 3 Polgar, Thomas

  4. Interpreting Results When evaluating an association between disease and exposure, we need guidelines to help determine whether there is a true difference in the frequency of disease between the two exposure groups, or perhaps just random variation from the study sample. 4

  5. Random Error (Chance) 1. Rarely can we study an entire population, so inference is attempted from a sample of the population 2. There will always be random variation from sample to sample 3. In general, smaller samples have less precision, reliability, and statistical power (more sampling variability) 5

  6. Hypothesis Testing • The process of deciding statistically whether the findings of an investigation reflect chance or real effects at a given level of probability. 6

  7. Elements of Testing hypothesis • Null Hypothesis • Alternative hypothesis • Identify level of significance • Test statistic • Identify p-value / confidence interval • Conclusion 7

  8. Hypothesis Testing H0: There is no association between the exposure and disease of interest H1: There is an association between the exposure and disease of interest Note:With prudent skepticism, the null hypothesis is given the benefit of the doubt until the data convince us otherwise. 8

  9. Hypothesis Testing • Because of statistical uncertainty regarding inferences about population parameters based upon sample data, we cannot prove or disprove either the null or alternate hypotheses as directly representing the population effect. • Thus, we make a decision based on probability and accept a probability of making an incorrect decision. 9 Chernick

  10. Associations • Two types of pitfalls can occur that affect the association between exposure and disease • Type 1 error: observing a difference when in truth there is none • Type 2 error: failing to observe a difference where there is one. 10

  11. Interpreting Epidemiologic Results Four possible outcomes of any epidemiologic study: REALITY 11

  12. Four possible outcomes of any epidemiologic study: REALITY 12

  13. Type I and Type II errors •  is the probability of committing type I error. •  is the probability of committing type II error. 13

  14. “Conventional” Guidelines: •Set the fixed alpha level (Type I error) to 0.05 This means,if the null hypothesis is true, the probability of incorrectly rejecting it is 5% or less. Study Result 14

  15. Empirical Rule • For a Normal distribution approximately, • a) 68% of the measurements fall within one standard deviation around the mean • b) 95% of the measurements fall within two standard deviations around the mean • c) 99.7% of the measurements fall within three standard deviations around the mean 15

  16. Normal Distribution 34.13% 34.13% 13.59% 13.59% 2.28% 2.28% 50% 50 % •  usually set at 5%) 16

  17. Random Error (Chance) • 4. A test statistic to assess “statistical significance”is performed to assess the degree to which the data are compatible with the null hypothesisof no association • Given a test statistic and an observed value, you can compute the probabilityof observing a value as extreme or more extreme than the observed value under the null hypothesis of no association. • This probability is called the“p-value” 17

  18. Random Error (Chance) 6. By convention, if p < 0.05, then the association between the exposure and disease is considered to be“statistically significant.” (e.g. we reject the null hypothesis (H0) and accept the alternative hypothesis (H1)) 18

  19. Random Error (Chance) • p-value • the probability that an effect at least as extreme as that observed could have occurred by chance alone, given there is truly no relationship between exposure and disease (Ho) • the probability the observed results occurred by chance • that the sample estimates of association differ only because of sampling variability. 19 Sever

  20. Random Error (Chance) What does p < 0.05 mean? Indirectly, it means that we suspect that the magnitude of effect observed (e.g. odds ratio) is not due to chance alone (in the absence of biased data collection or analysis) Directly, p=0.05 means that one test result out of twenty results would be expected to occur due to chance (random error) alone 20

  21. Example: IE+ = 15 / (15 + 85) = 0.15 IE- = 10 / (10 + 90) = 0.10 RR = IE+/IE- = 1.5, p = 0.30 Although it appears that the incidence of disease may be higher in the exposed than in the non-exposed (RR=1.5), the p-value of 0.30 exceeds the fixed alpha level of 0.05. This means that the observed data are relatively compatible with the null hypothesis. Thus, we do not reject H0 in favor of H1 (alternative hypothesis). 21

  22. Random Error (Chance) Take Note: The p-value reflects both the magnitude of the difference between the study groupsANDthe sample size • The size of the p-value does not indicate the importance of the results • Results may be statistically significant but be clinically unimportant • Results that are not statistically significant may still be important 22

  23. Sometimes we are more concerned with estimating the true difference than the probability that we are making the decision that the difference between samples is significant 23

  24. Random Error (Chance) A related, but more informative, measure known as theconfidence interval (CI)can also be calculated. CI = a range of values within which the true population value falls, with a certain degree of assurance (probability). 24

  25. Confidence Interval - Definition A range of values for a variable constructed so that this range has a specified probability of including the true value of the variable A measure of the study’s precision Point estimate Lower limit Upper limit Sever 25

  26. Statistical Measures of Chance • Confidence interval • 95% C.I. means that true estimate of effect (mean, risk, rate) lies within 2 standard errors of the population mean 95 times out of 100 Sever 26

  27. Interpreting Results Confidence Interval:Range of values for a point estimate that has a specified probability of including the true value of the parameter. Confidence Level:(1.0 – ), usually expressed as a percentage (e.g. 95%). Confidence Limits:The upper and lower end points of the confidence interval. 27

  28. Hypothetical Example of 95% Confidence Interval Exposure: Caffeine intake (high versus low) Outcome: Incidence of breast cancer Risk Ratio: 1.32 (point estimate) p-value: 0.14 (not statistically significant) 95% C.I.: 0.87 - 1.98 95% confidence interval _____________________________________________________ 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 (null value) 28

  29. Random Error (Chance) INTERPRETATION: Our best estimate is that women with high caffeine intake are 1.32 times (or 32%) more likely to develop breast cancer compared to women with low caffeine intake. However, we are 95% confident that the true value (risk) of the population lies between 0.87 and 1.98 (assuming an unbiased study). _____________________________________________ 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 (null value) 95% confidence interval 29

  30. Random Error (Chance) Interpretation: If the 95% confidence interval doesNOTinclude the null value of 1.0 (p < 0.05), then we declare a “statistically significant”association. If the 95% confidence interval includes the null value of 1.0, then the test result is “not statistically significant.” 30

  31. Interpreting Results Interpretation of C.I. For OR and RR: The C.I. provides an idea of the likely magnitude of the effect and the random variability of the point estimate. On the other hand, the p-value reveals nothing about the magnitude of the effect or the random variability of the point estimate. In general,smaller sample sizes have larger C.I.’sdue to uncertainty (lack of precision) in the point estimate. 31

  32. Selection of Tests of Significance 32

  33. 1. Nominal: Data do not represent an amount or quantity (e.g., Marital Status, Sex) 2. Ordinal: Data represent an ordered series of relationship (e.g., level of education) 3. Interval: Data are measured on an interval scale having equal units but an arbitrary zero point. (e.g.: Temperature in Fahrenheit) 4. Interval Ratio: Variable such as weight for which we can compare meaningfully one weight versus another (say, 100 Kg is twice 50 Kg) Scale of Data 33

  34. Which Test to Use? 34

  35. Protection against Random Error • Test statistics provide protection from type 1 error due to random chance • Test statistics do not guarantee protection against type 1 errors due to bias or confounding. • Statistics demonstrate association, but not causation. 35

More Related