1 / 57

ASW Process

ASW Process. World Languages, Arts Education, Health and Physical Education, AP & IB. Analysis of Student Work ASW 101. Cheryl Maney and Mark Propst Arts Education Department Kim Cooke Healthful Living Department Mara Cobe World Languages Parker Morse AP and IB.

jodie
Download Presentation

ASW Process

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ASW Process World Languages, Arts Education, Health and Physical Education, AP & IB

  2. Analysis of Student WorkASW 101 Cheryl Maney and Mark Propst Arts Education Department Kim Cooke Healthful Living Department Mara Cobe World Languages Parker Morse AP and IB

  3. A Little History and a Look into the Future • MSL = Measures of Student Learning • Small Pilot = 100 people across state Pilot Required by state Alternatives CMS Analysis of Student Work Feedback Form

  4. Analysis of Student Work ASW demonstrates a teacher’s contribution towards academic growth in the content area. Teachers submit student work which is rated by content experts in a “blind review” process. Contribute to Academic Success

  5. NC Professional Teaching Standards Standard I: Teachers demonstrate leadership. Standard II:Teachers establish a respectfulenvironmentfor a diverse populationof students. Standard III:Teachers know the content they teach. Standard IV:Teachers facilitate learning for their students. Standard V: Teachers reflect on their practice. Standard VI: Teachers contribute to the academic successof students.

  6. Overview of Standard 6 6 End of Grade (EOG) or End of Course (EOC) tests 6 Career Technical Education Assessment 6 NC Final Exams Contribute to Academic Success 6 K-3 Checkpoints 6 Analysis of Student Work

  7. Effectiveness Status NC Educator Evaluation System Contribute to Academic Success 1 2 3 4 5 6 Demonstrate Leadership Establish Environment KnowContent Facilitate Learning Reflect on Practice 3 Rating Categories 5 Rating Categories Not Demonstrated Developing Proficient Accomplished Distinguished

  8. ASW Process: Step 1: Teaching Context Sept. to Oct 15 and Feb AFs and APIs! Course and Teacher Coding!

  9. ASW Process: Step 2: Class Selection By Oct 15 And in Feb

  10. Class Selection The online platform will select the 5 classes in which the teacher must collect artifacts. Note: Teachers who are on a semester or 4x4 schedule will have classes selected for 1st semester. Classes for 2nd semester will be selected prior to 2nd semester.

  11. ASW Process: Step 3: Objective Selection

  12. NC Essential Standards: Clarifying Objective Selection • Looking at the NC Essential Standards, teachers will use the Strands guidance charts to select 5 clarifying objectives • one for each class selected by the platform.

  13. Arts EducationChoose one objective for each of the strands in your Arts Education discipline plus 1-2 additional objectives

  14. Healthful LivingChoose objectives based on Health, PE, or both depending on teaching situation

  15. World LanguagesObjectives encompass each of the 3 strands of World Languages and all of the Essential Standards that are part of your language program.

  16. AP/IB • AP Teachers will use the AP objectives posted on AP Central. • IB Teachers will use the IB objectives posted on the IB Online Curriculum Centre.

  17. Considerations for Teachers in Objective Selection • Realize that not all objectives link easily to the ASW process • Careful alignment between Objective chosen, instruction, assessment, and artifacts. • Focus on performance based assessment

  18. Principal’s Input Principal meets with the teacher to confirm that the 5 objectives chosen use the parameters in the Strands & Standards Guidance Chart Note: Teachers who are on a semester schedule will select for their first semester classes. After their second semester classes are selected by the platform, they will select their remaining objectives. AFs and APIs! Objective Selection

  19. ASW Process: Step 4: Timelapse Artifacts Oct. to Jan.2 And March- May

  20. Timelapse Artifacts • 5 timelapse artifacts are required • One timelapse artifact for each objective selected • Each Timelapse Artifact has: • 2 whole class work samples with context OR • 6 individual student work samples, two from each of the 3 students, with context

  21. Compile Timelapse Artifacts2 distinct points in time Time Teachers must choose two points in time to gather and harvest evidence of student growth on the clarifying objective chosen.

  22. Compile Timelapse ArtifactsIndividual Student Work Samples • Collect and keep 2 work • samples: • for each class member • for the objective • at 2 separate points in time

  23. Compile TimelapseArtifactsWhole Class Work Samples • 2 work samples that • represent the entire class • for the objective • at 2 separate points in time

  24. Assumptions?

  25. Compile TimelapseArtifacts: Methods to Harvesting Student Work REC Pre Test Sljdflkjdfsdfljsdfljdfsdflkjsdfsdflnksdflnsdfsdfllsdfsdflnsdfsdfklsdflkjffslflksdflkjsdfsdf Ljsdflksdf ;mf sdflmdfsdf;dfmsdf;sdfsdfmsdflmf, sdfmsd. Sdmsdf0 lsdjlkjsdflkjsdfljk Ljdflkjfljkdlkjsdftjtlkjltj ;jke;ljkw;jkw ;kw;lkwet ;w;jw ;jkw;ljkwklweljsdfljsdfsdljsdfljsdf Sljdflkjdfsdfljsdfljdfsdflkjsdfsdflnksdflnsdfsdfllsdfsdflnsdfsdfklsdflkjffslflksdflkjsdfsdf Ljsdflksdf ;mf sdflmdfsdf;dfmsdf;sdfsdfmsdflmf, sdfmsd. Sdmsdf0 lsdjlkjsdflkjsdfljk Ljdflkjfljkdlkjsdftjtlkjltj ;jke;ljkw;jkw ;kw;lkwet ;w;jw ;jkw;ljkwklweljsdfljsdfsdljsdfljsdf Sljdflkjdfsdfljsdfljdfsdflkjsdfsdflnksdflnsdfsdfllsdfsdflnsdfsdfklsdflkjffslflksdflkjsdfsdf

  26. AFs and APIs! TECHNOLOGY

  27. ASW Process: Step 5: Student Selection Early Jan and in June

  28. Student Selection Only for:Individual Student Work Samples Online platform will select 3 students The TAwill be compiled using the Individual Student Work Samples from these selected students. TA 1

  29. Student Selection Only for: Individual Student Work Samples If a student work sample is unavailable, that student will be reshuffled to create another sampling. TA 1 Principal is notified when a reshuffle is used by a teacher

  30. Student Selection • This step is not necessary for the classes where teachers have chosen to gather whole class work samples. • Even if the composition of a class changes, the teacher will still submit the whole class sample.

  31. ASW Process Step 6: Upload Artifacts By Jan 20 and in June

  32. Upload Evidence Context for 1st work sample in each Timelapse Artifact How does this artifact show where the student is in relation to the chosen clarifying objective? How does this artifact show where the student is in relation to the chosen clarifying objective? This artifact was created using an 8th grade Healthful Living Health Education Class containing 32 students before instruction on the objective began. In this video, the student did not show proper technique in the their performance of CPR in the following ways. 1. The students body position has him sitting on the victims waist. 2. The hands have been placed separately on the victims upper chest. 3. The compressions given are of insufficient depth and are given too slow. 4. The elbows are bending during the compression.

  33. Upload Evidence Context for 2nd work sample in each Timelapse Artifact How does this artifact show where the student is in relation to the chosen clarifying objective? How does this artifact show where the student is in relation to the chosen clarifying objective? This artifact was created using an 8th grade Health Education Class containing 32 students three class days after instruction began. In this video, the student shows proper technique in the their performance of CPR in the following ways. 1. The student has the proper body position, on his knees next to the victim. 2. The force of the compression is generated from the hips and applied in a vertical direction. 3. The hands are positioned with an interlocking grip. 4. The heel of the bottom hand has been placed on the sternum.

  34. Upload Evidence Context for Growth in each Timelapse Artifact Describe the growth that occurred between Points 1 and 2. Describe the growth that occurred between Points 1 and 2. CPR performed with the technique in video #1 was inadequate and would not have given the victim an opportunity to survive. The technique in video #2 would provide blood flow and oxygen to give the victim a chance of survival

  35. AFs and APIs! READING AND WRITING

  36. Upload Evidence 2 Timelapse Artifact Option 1 – Individual Student Work Samples with Context 1 2 1 Timelapse Artifact 1 2 1

  37. Upload Evidence Timelapse Artifact Option 2 – Whole Class Work Samples 2 1 Timelapse Artifact 1

  38. Upload Evidence All 5 Timelapse Artifacts will be uploaded to the online platformas the teacher’sEvidence Collectionfor the school year. TA 3 Student TA 1 Student TA 4 Student TA 2 Whole Class TA 5 Whole Class

  39. ASW Process Step 7: Blind Review Summer 2015

  40. Blind Review The Evidence Collection will be reviewed by 2 content area experts. E D M Reviewer #1 Reviewer #2

  41. Blind Review The platform sends the evidence collection to two reviewers who have been matched to the teacher because of their similar content area expertise. Reviewer #1 Reviewer #2

  42. Blind Review If the category ratings from each reviewer are the same, then the review process is complete and the Standard 6 rating will be posted for that year. M M Reviewer #1 Category Rating: Meets Expected Growth Reviewer #2

  43. Blind Review If the category ratings from the two reviewers are not the same, the Evidence Collection is automatically sent to a 3rd reviewer for an additional review to get a rating for that year. M E Reviewer #3 Reviewer #1 Reviewer #2

  44. Blind Review 2-Step ASW Process Review #2 ASW Quality Rubric #1Evidence Collection Checklist

  45. ASW Process Step 8: Receive Rating Fall 2015

  46. Receive Rating Evidence Collection Rating Form: • D = Does Not Meet Expected Growth • M = Meets Expected Growth • E = Exceeds Expected Growth D M M M E

  47. Receive Rating Synthesis table to determine Standard 6 rating

More Related