440 likes | 874 Views
Esophageal Cancer. Akshra Verma, MD, MS Dr. Sohail A. Chaudhry MD. Epidemiology. ~ 13,900 new cases each year (2003) ~ 13,000 deaths each year Seventh leading cause of death Risk increases with age Mean age at diagnosis 67yrs Lifetime risk 0.8% for men 0.3% for women.
E N D
Esophageal Cancer Akshra Verma, MD, MS Dr. Sohail A. Chaudhry MD
Epidemiology ~ 13,900 new cases each year (2003) ~ 13,000 deaths each year Seventh leading cause of death Risk increases with age Mean age at diagnosis 67yrs Lifetime risk 0.8% for men 0.3% for women
Changing trends • Until the 1970s • Squamous Cell Ca 75% • AdenoCa 25% • Past 20-30yrs • Incidence of SCC has decreased both in AA and Caucasian • Incidence of AdenoCa increased by 450% in Caucasian men and 50% in black AA men • In 1994 60% of all esophageal cancers were adenocarcinoma.
Annual rate of neoplastic transformation of ~0.5% NEJM 2003; 349:2241-52
Progression of Barrett’s Esophagus 4% per year 1% per year 0.5 % per year
Clinical Symptoms • Dysphagia • Odynophagia • Weight loss • Less often: Dyspnea, cough, hoarseness and pain in retro-sternal, back or right upper abdominal • Metastatic Disease: Lymphadenopathy (Virchow’s node), hepatomegaly, pleural effusion
Esophageal Carcinoma • Adenocarinoma : 75% in distal esophagus • Squamous Cell Ca: evenly distributed in middle and lower third • AT DIAGNOSIS: More than 50% have unresectable tumors or radiographically visible metastasis
Esophagogram Showing a Malignant Esophageal Stricture NEJM 2003; 349:2241-52
TransmuralAdenocarcinoma of the Esophagus Associated with Barrett's Esophagus NEJM 2003; 349:2241-52
Cancer of the Distal Esophagus with Metastasis to a Paraesophageal Lymph Node NEJM 2003; 349:2241-52
Predictorsof prognosis. • Staging of disease at diagnosis • Weightloss of more than 10 percent of body mass • Dysphagia • Largetumors • Advanced age • lymphatic micrometastases (identifiedby immunohistochemical analysis) are
Treatment Surgical resection is the standard treatment for early esophageal cancer : Stages I, II and some cases of III During the past decade, outcomes with surgery have improved resulting in a better 5 year survival due to: Better staging techniques Improved surgical technique Recent Data Rate of curative resection : 54 to 69% Rate of operative mortality :4 to 10% perioperative complications : 26 to 41%
Transhiatal ** Exposure is provided by an upper midline laparotomy and a left neck incision. The thoracic esophagus is bluntly dissected, and a cervical anastomosis created; thoracotomy is not required. Drawbacks: inability to perform a full thoracic lymphadenectomy, and lack of visualization of the midthoracic dissection. Transthoracic The Ivor Lewis esophagectomy combines a laparotomy with right thoracotomy, and produces an intrathoracicanastomosis. This technique permits direct visualization of the thoracic esophagus, and allows the surgeon to perform a limited lymphadenectomy. However formal dissection of lymph nodes is not performed Types of esophagectomies **Lower rate of peri-operative complications (mainly fewer pulmonary complication, lower incidence of chylous leakage)
Role of Radiotherapy • Radiotherapy : In pt with SCC of esophagaus and poor surgical candidates • Advantage: avoidance of perioperative morbidity and mortality • Not as effective palliative maneuver as surgery for dysphagia and odynophagia • higher probability of local complications like esophagotracheal fistula • Preoperative Radiotherapy: No survival advantage
Role of Chemotherapy • Preoperative Chemotherapy (Cisplatin and Fluorouracil) : possible small benefit • Preoperative Chemotherapy and Radiation therapy
Comparing Preoperative Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy with Surgery Alone NEJM 2003; 349:2241-52
Surgery alone Vs Combined modality therapy. Phase III study Median Survival: 11m 1 yr survival: 44% 2 yr survival: 26% 3 yr survival 6% Surgery N=55 Randomize N=113 Adeno Cis/5FU XRT Surgery N=58 Median Survival :16m 1 yr survival 52% 2 yr survival37% 3 yr survival 32% Two courses of chemotherapy in weeks 1 and 6 5 FU 15 mg per kg daily for five days Cisplatin, 75 mg per square m2 on day 7 Radiotherapy, 40 Gy, administered in 15 fractions over a 3-week period, beginning concurrently with the first course of chemotherapy. Walsh et al NEJM
Walsh et al Kaplan–Meier Plot of Survival of Patients with Esophageal Adenocarcinoma, According to the Intention-to-Treat Analysis. NEJM Vol 335:462-467
Walsh et al • At the time of surgery: • 42 % (23 of 55) of patients treated with preoperative multimodal therapy who could be evaluated had positive nodes or metastases versus • 82 % (45 of 55) of patients who underwent surgery alone (P<0.001). • 25 % of patients who underwent surgery after multimodal therapy had complete responses, as determined pathologically. NEJM Vol 335:462-467
Post op Chemo and Radiation • Role is currently undefined • No proven benefit in node negative patients • Node positive patients may be benefited and should be enrolled in clinical trials as there is currently no evidence of benefit. • Patients with incompletely resected tumors or positive margins should receive adjuvant chemoradiation if they can tolerate it, otherwise only XRT
Role of Chemotherapy Contd.. • Preoperative Chemotherapy (Cisplatin and Fluorouracil) : possible small benefit • Preoperative Chemotherapy and Radiation therapy • Post op Chemotherapy and radiation therapy offered to pt with incomplete resection • Non surgical Chemotherapy and radiation therapy: Long term survival in 25% of pts
Management of Advanced Stage IV Disease • Chemoradiotherapy for palliation of symptoms • Infusional 5-FU 1000 mg/m2 per day, days 1 to 4, and 29 to 33 • Cisplatin 75 mg/m2, on days 1 and 29 • Concurrent external beam RT (50.4 Gy in daily 2 Gy fractions) • Shrinkage of the tumor by atleast 50 percent may occur in 15 to 30% of patients whoare treated with fluorouracil, a taxane (paclitaxel or docetaxel),or irinotecan • Addition of cisplatin : 35 to 55 percent • Response to chemotherapytypically lasts a few months, and survival rarely exceeds one year
Future Directions • Cetuximab : Ab that blocks EGFR • Synergy with both chemo and rad therapy in head & neck Ca and colorectal Ca • Trastuzumab, targeted at HER-2/neu pathway in addition to cisplatin, paclitaxel and combined radiotherapy • Bevacizumab, targeted at VEGF ligand • Oral agents: inhibits tyrosine kinase associated with EGFR, OSI-774 and ZD 1839