260 likes | 494 Views
Overview of the current state of the research in Homeopathy. Dr Alexander Tournier BSc Cantab PhD LCHE RSHom. Aims. To show that science and homeopathy are indeed compatible To present evidence coming from different fields of science To present Homeopathy Research Institute.
E N D
Overview of the current state of the research in Homeopathy Dr Alexander Tournier BSc Cantab PhD LCHE RSHom
Aims To show that science and homeopathy are indeed compatible To present evidence coming from different fields of science To present Homeopathy Research Institute
Definition of ‘Science’ “Any system of knowledge that is concerned with the physical world and its phenomena and that entails unbiased observations and systematic experimentation. ” Encyclopaedia Britannica
Scientific discovery process Science of Homeopathy Observation Experimentation Theories Understanding
Unscientific argumentation “Homeopathy does not work … … because it cannot work” is not scientific, as it is not grounded in observation
Science of homeopathy Hahnemann built homeopathy following a rigorous scientific approach: Experimentation Provings Clinical experience Theories and concepts Law of similars Principle of dilution Concept of the vital force
Different scientific approaches Pharmaceutical model CAM model Screening Practice Mechanism Safety Trials of efficacy Effectiveness Effectiveness in practise Efficacy of components Safety Mechanism of action Adapted from Fonnebo etal BMC Med Res Meth 2007 11(7) 7
Homeopathy: a new science Number of scientific publications over the last 20 year Adhami H.R. , S.Shamloo D., Mesgarpour B., H.Tehrani S.A. “The trend of homeopathic articles indexed in pubmed and ISI” LMHI 2008
Scientific evidence in Homeopathy Materials sciences Molecular and cellular systems Animal studies Human studies
Evidence from Material Sciences NMR evidence (5/5 Hi-Qt* pub) Low temp thermoluminescence Raman and UV-Vis Spectroscopy Dielectric strength *Quality assessed using SAPEH scores, high-quality > 6 Review: C Witt etal J Alt Comp Med 2003 9:1, 113-32
Molecular and cellular systems Enzymatic reactions (7/9 Hi-Qt* pub) Cultured cells (5/9 Hi-Qt pub) Basophil degranulation(8/11 Hi-Qt pub) *Quality assessed using SAPEH scores, high-quality > 6 C Witt etal Comp Ther Med, 2007 15 128-38
Animal systems One review in 1998 (no access) One review in immunology in 2006 Immunostimulation (16 pub) Immunoregulation, inflammatory processes(20 pub) No systematic review in this area despite wide use and high number of experiments Effect of thyroxin on frog development
Human trials 134 RCT have been published 59 (44%) positive 67 (50%) neutral (small effect) 8 (6%) negative 23 systematic reviews 10 positive 8 non-conclusive 5 little or no evidence P. Fisher ‘Research in Homoeopathy: Who needs it’ LMHI 2008
Only one review up to 1995 More recent trials are of higher quality Need a review of the recent provings Need more trials Human provingsor Human pathogenetic trials
Human provingsA successful example Associated p = 0.0002 Adapted from H. Möllinger ‘Homeopathic Drug Provings between historical and scientific demand’ LMHI 2008
Meta-analyses *Included in UK DARE (Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects)
Conclusions based on comparison of 8 homeopathy vs. 6 conventional medicine trials, not 110 vs. 110 Criteria for selection of 8 high-quality trials were not given and no references were given Does not conform with QUOROM guidelines for systematic reviews Not classified as a systematic review by UK DARE (Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects) Shang etal 2005 Meta-analysis
Levels of evidence Level I meta-analyses and/or systematic reviews Level IIamultiple controlled, randomised experiments Level IIb some controlled, randomised experiments Level IIIa studies with multiple cohorts Level IIIb some cohort studies Level IV opinion of experts From Michel van Wassenhoven LMHI 2008
Levels of evidence Material sciences IIa+ (one systematic review) Molecular and cellular IIa+ (one systematic review) Animals IIIa / IIb
Levels of evidence for human trials Michel van Wassenhofen, ECH publication LMHI 2008
Conclusions A lot of scientific evidence exists However, a lot of it is still of low quality Need more studies, esp. animal studies Many questions remain Still need a lot of research
Homeopathy Research Institute Aims: To perform and promote high-quality scientific research in homeopathy To collate, clarify and disseminate the existing scientific evidence in homeopathy
Homeopathy Research Institute Scientific committee Dr Alexander Tournier PhD Clare Relton MSc Dr Robert Mathie PhD Dr Elizabeth Thompson BAOxon MBBS MRCP FFHom Prof. Kate Thomas Dr Lionel Milgrom PhD Dr Mike Emmans Dean PhD Dr Nagin Lad PhD Dr Natasa Peric-Concha PhD Dr Patti Bayliss MBChB FRCGP
Homeopathy Research Institute Current projects Curated database of research articles National survey of homeopathy practice Scientific expertise for new research projects Homeopathy use in breast cancer patients Membership scheme
Thank you For more information: alextournier@homeoinst.org www.homeopathyresearchinstitute.org