1 / 34

Rate Impact Task Force’s Updated Results for it’s Report to the SPP Regional State Committee

1. 11/30/2010. DRAFT. Rate Impact Task Force’s Updated Results for it’s Report to the SPP Regional State Committee. Updates Since Oct 13, 2010 Presentation. ATRR Zonal Cost Forecast Updated: New Costs (PP and BP, $327M total increases) Updated In-Service Dates

jolie
Download Presentation

Rate Impact Task Force’s Updated Results for it’s Report to the SPP Regional State Committee

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 1

  2. 11/30/2010 DRAFT Rate Impact Task Force’s Updated Resultsfor it’s Report to the SPP Regional State Committee

  3. Updates Since Oct 13, 2010 Presentation • ATRR Zonal Cost Forecast Updated: • New Costs (PP and BP, $327M total increases) • Updated In-Service Dates • Re-calculated BP Transfers: $64M/yr from $31.2M/yr • Costs Updated in Each Zone’s Results

  4. Differential Analysis of New v. Old Forecast2017Differential = Change - Base

  5. Differential Analysis of New v. Old Forecast2017Differential = Change - Base

  6. New Zonal Results Presented • Sunflower Electric Power Corporation • City Utilities of Springfield Missouri • Mid-Kansas Electric Company • Western Farmers Electric Cooperative

  7. Rate Impact Task Force Results • Four Types of Customers Considered • 1,000 kWh/mo residential • 4,000 kWh/mo small commercial • Actual average residential • Actual average small commercial

  8. Rate Impact Task Force Results, cont. • Monthly Incremental Cost Impact of Investment by Customer Rate Type Determined, 3% Straight Line Depreciation and Balancing Transfers Included • Selected Quantitative Monthly Benefits Impact by Customer Rate Type Used to Off-Set Costs • Monthly Rate Incremental Impact by Customer Rate Type Determined • Focus: 2017, Typical Peak Cost Year

  9. Detailed Results by Type • For Each Customer Type, “All-In-One” Graphs are Presented: • Monthly Cost Incremental to Current Bill (Red Bar) • Monthly Benefits Offset Cost (Green Bar) • Monthly Net Impact Incremental to Current Bill (Orange Bar with $/Month Value)

  10. Summary RITF 2017 Results, 1,000 kWh/mo Residential

  11. RITF 2017 Results, 4,000 kWh/mo Small Commercial

  12. RITF 2017 Results, Actual Average Residential

  13. Summary RITF Results, Actual Average Small Commercial

  14. Detailed View of Each Result • For Each Customer Type by Zone • 1000 kWh/mo Fixed Residential • 4000 kWh/mo Fixed Small Commercial • Actual Average Residential • Actual Average Small Commercial • Each Result by Zone • Cost • Benefit • Net

  15. Cost Results, 1,000 kWh/mo Residential

  16. Benefits Results, 1,000 kWh/mo Residential, Shown as Negative Costs

  17. Net Impact Results, 1,000 kWh/mo Residential

  18. Cost Results, 4,000 kWh/mo Small Commercial

  19. Benefit Results, 4,000 kWh/mo Small Commercial

  20. Net Impact Results, 4,000 kWh/mo Small Commercial

  21. Cost Results, Average Residential

  22. Benefits Results, Average Residential

  23. Net Impact Results, Average Residential

  24. Cost Results, Average Small Commercial

  25. Benefits Results, Average Small Commercial

  26. Net Impact, Average Small Commercial

  27. Differential Analysis of CWIP v. AFUDC • Base: AFUDC instead of CWIP • Change: CWIP • Differential = Change – Base • AFUDC revenue requirement calculated by multiplying the Average Annual CWIP balance by the Weighted Average Cost of Capital • CWIP revenue requirement calculated by multiplying the Average Annual CWIP balance by the Weighted Average Cost of Capital plus Taxes on CWIP • Note: CWIP is included in the cost forecast but did not effect the 2017 results because the last CWIP payment is scheduled in 2014

  28. Expected Results

  29. CWIP Cost Allocation per Year, 2009-2014As Reported by ITC and Prairie Wind

  30. Pat Bourne Director - Transmission Policy pbourne@spp.org 501-614-3249 Dan Jones, PE Lead Regulatory Engineer djones@spp.org 501-688-1717 Dee Edmundson Engineer I dedmunson@spp.org 501-688-1778 34

More Related