1 / 56

Regression with a Binary Dependent Variable (SW Chapter 11)

Regression with a Binary Dependent Variable (SW Chapter 11). Example: Mortgage denial and race The Boston Fed HMDA data set . The Linear Probability Model. The Linear Probability Model. Example : Linear Prob Model. Linear probability model: HMDA data. Linear probability model: HMDA data.

jon
Download Presentation

Regression with a Binary Dependent Variable (SW Chapter 11)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Regression with a Binary Dependent Variable (SW Chapter 11)

  2. Example: Mortgage denial and raceThe Boston Fed HMDA data set

  3. The Linear Probability Model

  4. The Linear Probability Model

  5. Example: Linear Prob Model

  6. Linear probability model: HMDA data

  7. Linear probability model: HMDA data

  8. Linear probability model: Application Cattaneo, Galiani, Gertler, Martinez, and Titiunik (2009). “Housing, Health, and Happiness.” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 1(1): 75 - 105 • What was the impact of PisoFirme, a large-scale Mexican program to help families replace dirt floors with cement floors? • A pledge by governor Enrique Martinez y Martinez led to State of Coahuila offering free 50m2 of cement flooring ($150 value), starting in 2000, for homeowners with dirt floors

  9. Cattaneo et al. (AEJ:Economic Policy 2009) “Housing, Health, & Happiness” X1 = “Program dummy” = 1 if offered Piso Firme.

  10. Cattaneo et al. (AEJ:Economic Policy 2009) “Housing, Health, & Happiness” X1 = “Program dummy” = 1 if offered Piso Firme Interpretations?

  11. Probit and Logit Regression

  12. Probit Regression

  13. STATA Example: HMDA data

  14. STATA Example: HMDA data, ctd.

  15. Probit regression with multiple regressors

  16. STATA Example: HMDA data

  17. STATA Example: HMDA data

  18. STATA Example: HMDA data

  19. Probit Regression Marginal Effects

  20. Probit Regression Marginal Effects . sum pratio; Variable | Obs Mean Std. Dev. Min Max -------------+-------------------------------------------------------- pratio | 1140 1.027249 .286608 .497207 2.324675 . scalar meanpratio = r(mean); . sum disp_pepsi; Variable | Obs Mean Std. Dev. Min Max -------------+-------------------------------------------------------- disp_pepsi | 1140 .3640351 .4813697 0 1 . scalar meandisp_pepsi = r(mean); . sum disp_coke; Variable | Obs Mean Std. Dev. Min Max -------------+-------------------------------------------------------- disp_coke | 1140 .3789474 .4853379 0 1 . scalar meandisp_coke = r(mean); . probit coke pratio disp_coke disp_pepsi; Iteration 0: log likelihood = -783.86028 Iteration 1: log likelihood = -711.02196 Iteration 2: log likelihood = -710.94858 Iteration 3: log likelihood = -710.94858 Probit regression Number of obs = 1140 LR chi2(3) = 145.82 Prob > chi2 = 0.0000 Log likelihood = -710.94858 Pseudo R2 = 0.0930 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ coke | Coef. Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval] -------------+---------------------------------------------------------------- pratio | -1.145963 .1808833 -6.34 0.000 -1.500487 -.791438 disp_coke | .217187 .0966084 2.25 0.025 .027838 .4065359 disp_pepsi | -.447297 .1014033 -4.41 0.000 -.6460439 -.2485502 _cons | 1.10806 .1899592 5.83 0.000 .7357465 1.480373 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  21. Probit Regression Marginal Effects

  22. Logit Regression

  23. STATA Example: HMDA data

  24. Predicted probabilities from estimated probit and logit models usually are (as usual) very close in this application.

  25. Logit Regression Marginal Effects

  26. Comparison of Marginal Effects

  27. Probit model: Application Arcidiacono and Vigdor (2010). “Does the River Spill Over? Estimating the Economic Returns to Attending a Racially Diverse College.” Economic Inquiry 48(3): 537 – 557. • Does “diversity capital” matter and does minority representation increase it? • Does diversity improve post-graduate outcomes of non-minority students? • College & Beyond survey, starting college in 1976

  28. Arcidiacono & Vigdor (EI, 2010)

  29. Arcidiacono & Vigdor (EI, 2010)

  30. Arcidiacono & Vigdor (EI, 2010)

  31. Logit model: Application Bodvarsson & Walker (2004). “Do Parental Cash Transfers Weaken Performance in College?” Economics of Education Review 23: 483 – 495. • When parents pay for tuition & books does this undermine the incentive to do well? • Univ of Nebraska @ Lincoln & Washburn Univ in Topeka, KS, 2001-02 academic year

  32. Bodvarsson & Walker (EconEduR,2004)

  33. Bodvarsson & Walker (EconEduR,2004)

  34. Estimation and Inference in Probit (and Logit) Models

  35. Probit estimation by maximum likelihood

  36. Special case: probit MLE with no X

  37. The MLE in the “no-X” case (Bernoulli distribution), ctd.:

  38. The MLE in the “no-X” case (Bernoulli distribution), ctd:

  39. The probit likelihood with one X

  40. The probit likelihood function:

  41. The Probit MLE, ctd.

  42. The logit likelihood with one X

  43. Measures of fit for logit and probit

  44. Application to the Boston HMDA Data (SW Section 11.4)

  45. The HMDA Data Set

  46. The loan officer’s decision

  47. Regression specifications

More Related