1 / 3

PREVENT, DETECT, MITIGATE, REACT

PREVENT, DETECT, MITIGATE, REACT. Swedish Defence Research Agency: Coordinator. FCT-11-2014 : Urban security topic 2: Countering the terrorist use of an explosive threat , across the timeline of a plot , including the detection of explosives in a flow. POCs

jontae
Download Presentation

PREVENT, DETECT, MITIGATE, REACT

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. PREVENT, DETECT, MITIGATE, REACT Swedish Defence Research Agency: Coordinator FCT-11-2014: Urban securitytopic2:Countering the terrorist use of an explosive threat, across the timeline of a plot, including the detection of explosives in a flow • POCs • Henric Oestmark, + 46 8 5550 4191 • Henric.oestmark@foi.se • Malin Kölhed, +46 8 5550 4197 • Malin.kolhed@foi.se • Hans Önnerud, +46 5550 4058 • Hans.onnerud@foi.se

  2. The call - The consortium • Specific challenge: This research should propose innovative approaches to develop methods/technologies able to fill existing gaps or greatly improve already existing along the terrorist timeline… • Scope: Proposals should address the full time line of a terrorist explosive plot. At each period of the time line, the project should assess the effectiveness of the supporting method/technology….. • Outcome:The outcome of the proposal is expected to lead to development up to Technology Readiness Levels (TRL) 7..... ENFORCE: Effectiveness of systems for countering explosive threats Tentative consortium so far: Research Institues • FOI (SE) • TNO (NL) • ENEA (IT) End Users • BKA (DE) • Swedish police (SE) Industry • MORPHO (FR) SME • ….

  3. Consortium & ideas • Review of FP 7 obtained results • Cost – benefit analysis • Identification of gaps and scenarios for technology developments • Integration and adaptation of existing techniques • Future perspective and roadmap • Cost-benefit analysis/effectivness study : 50 % • Technology adaptation/development: 50 % • Technology oriented partners, e.g.: • Fast imagingtechniques – targets in a flow • Radar, tomography, THz/mm wave • Dogs/biosensors – explosive focus • Sensor integration specialist • End users • Authorities/Police/Intelligence Additional partners needed

More Related