1 / 13

Impact Evaluation of Community Participation in State-Owned Land Registration: Case Study of Commune Makebuko-Burundi

This study presents the impact evaluation of community participation in the state-owned land registration process in Commune Makebuko, Burundi. It assesses the community's contribution, encourages their participation, and appeals to donors to finance private land registration. The study highlights the importance of community awareness and their contribution in discovering squatters and illegal allocations, facilitating mediation, and reducing potential land conflicts. It concludes with recommendations for promoting community participation and securing land tenure.

jorgej
Download Presentation

Impact Evaluation of Community Participation in State-Owned Land Registration: Case Study of Commune Makebuko-Burundi

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. IMPACT EVALUATION OF COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION IN STATE-OWNED LAND REGISTRATION PROCESS: CASE STUDY OF THE COMMUNE MAKEBUKO-BURUNDI Presented by Hermenegilde Rurakengereza On YARA conference in Cape Town, 6th february 2017

  2. I. CONTEXT • Traditional land tenure • Dual land tenure systems • Prevalence of landlord-tenant relationships • Abolition of landlord-tenant relationships • Enactment of the first land code • Actual land legislations

  3. II. OBJECTIVES • Assessment of community contribution • Encouragement of the community participation • Appeal to donors to finance private land registration

  4. III.METHODS USED • Interviews • Participative method

  5. IV. COMMUNITY AWARENESS

  6. V. COMMUNITY CONTRIBUTIONSV. 1. Discover squatters

  7. V.2. Help discover illegal and/or irregular allocations

  8. V.3. Facilitate Mediation

  9. VI. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONSVI.1. CONCLUSION • Community participation help increase the stock of state-owned land • It facilitates alternative dispute resolution • It considerably decrease potential land related conflicts

  10. VI.2. RECOMMENDATIONS • State should encourage the community participation • The community members to act as good citizen • Authorities should be abide by the rule of law • International donars to back up the program • International donars should finance the private land registration

  11. VII. BIBIOGRAPHY • Kothari C.R., Research Methodology, 2nd Edition, 2004 • Crousse B. &others, Espaces disputés en Afrique noire, Editions KARTHALA, 1986 • Mathieu P.& others, Démocratie, enjeux fonciers et pratiques locales en Afrique, Editions l’Harmattan, 1996 • Godfrin P, Degoffe M., Droit administratif des biens, 9ème Edition, 2009 • Thibo C., Histoire démographique du Burundi, Editions KARTHALA, 2004 • Le Roy E., La sécurisation foncière en Afrique, Editions KARTHALA, 1996

  12. END END

More Related