1 / 18

Distributable Threads – An overview

Distributable Threads – An overview. Venkita Subramonian Nov 20 2003 CS523 Fall 2003. Outline. CORBA and RTCORBA overview Dynamic scheduling in RTCORBA Distributable threads model Preliminary implementation. Overview of CORBA . Common Object Request Broker Architecture (CORBA)

jorn
Download Presentation

Distributable Threads – An overview

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Distributable Threads – An overview Venkita Subramonian Nov 20 2003 CS523 Fall 2003

  2. Outline • CORBA and RTCORBA overview • Dynamic scheduling in RTCORBA • Distributable threads model • Preliminary implementation

  3. Overview of CORBA • Common Object Request Broker Architecture (CORBA) • A family of specifications • OMG is the standards body • Over 800 companies • CORBA defines interfaces, not implementations • It simplifies development of distributed applications by automating/encapsulating • Object location • Connection & memory mgmt. • Parameter (de)marshaling • Event & request demultiplexing • Error handling & fault tolerance • Object/server activation • Concurrency • Security • CORBA shields applications from heterogeneous platform dependencies • e.g., languages, operating systems, networking protocols, hardware

  4. RTCORBA 1.0 • RT CORBA adds QoS control to regular CORBA to improve application predictability, e.g., • Bounding priority inversions & • Managing resources end-to-end • Policies & mechanisms for resource configuration/control in RT-CORBA include: • Processor Resources • Thread pools • Priority models • Portable priorities • Communication Resources • Protocol policies • Explicit binding • Memory Resources • Request buffering • Limitations of CORBA • Lack of QoS specifications • Lack of QoS enforcement • Lack of real-time programming features • Lack of performance optimizations

  5. RTCORBA 2.0 • RTCORBA 1.0 addresses static scheduling of resources • RTCORBA 2.0 intended for dynamically scheduled distributed real-time systems • Originally referred to as Dynamic Real-Time CORBA • Addresses the need to spread a real-time application across multiple physically dispersed computing nodes • Addresses end-to-end scheduling • Introduces a Distributable thread abstraction for an end-to-end computation

  6. What is a Distributable Thread? • Based on the "distributed (trans-node) thread" abstraction first introduced in the Alpha distributed real-time OS kernel • An Architectural Overview Of The Alpha Real-Time Distributed Kernel (1993) - Raymond K. Clark, E. Douglas Jensen, Franklin D. Reynolds • Also influential in the Distributed Real-Time Specification for Java, proposed in Sun Java Specification Request JSR-000050 • A programming model abstraction for end-to-end control flow • A thread that can execute operations in objects without regard for physical node boundaries • A program may consist of multiple concurrent distributable threads

  7. How is this relevant to CS523? • Extending concept of thread scheduling end-to-end • The distributable thread (not a local thread) is the schedulable entity • Pluggable dynamic schedulers • Scheduler interfaces standardized by RTCORBA 2.0 • Similar to the hierarchical scheduling framework in our project • Scheduling Parameter interfaces (some of them atleast) defined by RTCORBA 2.0 • Similar to concept of rms_attr_t, edf_attr_t (in our project)

  8. <GUID, TID> <GUID, TID> Distributed system model DT carries scheduling parameters with it Host 1 Host 2 RTCORBA 2.0 Scheduler RTCORBA 2.0 Scheduler DT Physical binding of a single DT with two OS threads

  9. DTs within a single node Scheduler invocation points • Programming model very similar to transaction programming model in databases begin_transaction() Do atomic stuff end_transaction()

  10. DTs spanning multiple endsystems BSS – begin_scheduling_segment ESS – end_scheduling_segment Application call Interceptor call Scheduling parameters serialized at ORB interceptor points for migration

  11. Distributable thread implementation • Vast area of research • Several issues to be addressed • Mutual exclusion and TSS semantics with same GUID mapped to two different TIDs • Scheduling parameter propagation • Heterogeneous schedulers • Focus of this discussion • Scheduler implementation

  12. GUID=1, importance=1 GUID=1, importance=1 GUID=2, importance=2 GUID=2, importance=2 Condition Variable based implementation Middleware Scheduler/Dispatcher bss uss broadcast Most eligible Condition variable wait bss

  13. CV approach - variation • Instead of a single CV, associate a CV with each thread • Each thread waits on its own CV • Only most eligible thread is signalled instead of a broadcast to the single CV • Less number of context switches • More resource (CV) consumption

  14. Priority based approach • Assign thread priority based on scheduling parameters • Scheduling algorithm determines eligibility criterion • OS dispatcher takes care of actual dispatching of threads • Middleware Scheduler just maps from scheduling parameters to OS priority • Only coarse mapping from scheduling parameter to OS priority • T1 Deadline = 100 ticks from now – Assign priority 5 • T2 Deadline = 95 ticks from now – Assign priority 6 • T3 Deadline = 90 ticks from now – What priority do we assign? sched-params Middleware Scheduler OS prio OS Dispatcher

  15. Solution – Use priority levels • Four priority levels • Scheduler thread runs at executive level • Active and Inactive levels to control thread execution based on eligibility • Blocked priority level to “park” threads that have blocked • This ensures that the thread gets a chance to be rescheduled when it unblocks

  16. Issues with Level based approach • Threads have to explicitly inform the scheduler that they are going to block • One solution is to write wrappers for each blocking function • Very cumbersome • Error-prone • Scheduler activation concept might be useful • Portability of middleware code an issue • Idea of a “Block Catcher” thread (something like an idle thread) • The “Block catcher” thread just signals the scheduler thread to wakeup

  17. CV vs Priority implementations

  18. Conclusion • Lot of concepts from CS523 found applicable to this implementation • Implementation done as part of Kokyu framework and made available as part of ACE/TAO source. • A fertile area for new research • Future work • Application in Real-world scenarios (DARPA PCES project) • Group Scheduling abstraction (KU – Dr. Doug Niehaus) • Useful Links • http://www.omg.org/technology/documents/formal/RT_dynamic.htm • http://www.real-time.org/realtimecobra.htm • http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/

More Related