1 / 42

Advancements in Cosmic Particle Detection Using Radio and Radar Techniques

Explore the utilization of radio and radar methods for detecting ultra-high-energy cosmic particles. Investigate radar studies of ionization columns and lunar satellite detection of Askar’yan radio pulses. The presentation discusses objectives, high-energy cosmic particle physics, and outlook on astroparticle physics applications.

josephhughes
Download Presentation

Advancements in Cosmic Particle Detection Using Radio and Radar Techniques

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Detection of Ultra High-Energy Cosmic Particles with the Use of Radio and Radar Methods December 7, 2005 Oscar StålPhysics in Space ProgrammeSwedish Institute of Space Physics, Uppsala Dept. of Astronomy and Space Physics, Uppsala University Supervisor: Bo Thidé Oscar Stål os@irfu.se IRFU seminarUppsala, 7/12/2005

  2. Outline • Presentation of objectives • Introductory high-energy cosmic particle physics • Radar studies of EAS ionisation columns • Lunar satellite detection of Askar’yan radio pulses • Discussion and outlook Oscar Stål os@irfu.se IRFU seminarUppsala, 7/12/2005

  3. Background and framework • LOIS radio sensor network and deep space radar projectInitiated by Bo Thidé, collaboration with LOFAR (Netherlands) • Provides new methods to study fundamental physics in space Can this facility or these methods be of use in astroparticle physics? • If not usable, at least it is necessary to quantify what radio/radar background to expect from UHE cosmic particles • Ultimate goal is low-frequency array on the Moon – LIFE (LURBO) Oscar Stål os@irfu.se IRFU seminarUppsala, 7/12/2005

  4. Objectives • Our objectives for this diploma work have been two-fold: • To determine, by approximate analytical methods, the radar cross section of the ionisation columns created by Extensive Air Showers • To investigate the feasibility of using a lunar satellite for in situ detection of Askar’yan radio pulses from cosmic particle interactions with the lunar regolith Oscar Stål os@irfu.se IRFU seminarUppsala, 7/12/2005

  5. Outline • Presentation of objectives • Introductory high-energy cosmic particle physics • Radar studies of EAS ionisation columns • Lunar satellite detection of Askar’yan radio pulses • Discussion and outlook Oscar Stål os@irfu.se IRFU seminarUppsala, 7/12/2005

  6. Cosmic rays • Charged particles: p,  • Steep decrease of flux with energy:~ E-2.7 E < 1015 eV~ E-3.1 E > 1015 eV • Flux extends to the highest energy ever observed (UHE) • Isotropic flux, B obfuscation • Sources of UHE particles not yet determined Oscar Stål os@irfu.se IRFU seminarUppsala, 7/12/2005

  7. Extensive Air Showers (EAS) • Cosmic particle interacts with constituentsof the atmosphere • Shower of secondary particles generated • Hadronic, muonic and EM components • Transverse scale given by Molière radius,90% of the energy contained within rM • For air, rM = 70 m at sea level andincreasing with altitude to severalhundred metres Oscar Stål os@irfu.se IRFU seminarUppsala, 7/12/2005

  8. Detection of UHE cosmic rays • Air shower arraysHaverah Park, AGASA, KASCADE, Pierre AugerDetects shower particles at ground level • Fluorescence telescopesFly's eye, HiRes Fly's EyeExcellent energy resolution, sensitivity Low duty cycle • Radio methodsPioneered in the 60's, now LOPESCoherent geosynchrotron emissionHighly polarised short radio pulses Falcke et al., Nature 435 (2005) Oscar Stål os@irfu.se IRFU seminarUppsala, 7/12/2005

  9. The Greisen-Zatsepin-Kuzmin (GZK) cutoff • For E > 1019.5 eV, cosmic rays interact with CMB photons • Pion photoproduction: p +  p0 + p p +  + + n etc. • Intergalactic medium no longer transparent over Mpc scales • Still, cosmic rays have been observed beyond this “cutoff” • A most interesting questionin astroparticle physics is why? Oscar Stål os@irfu.se IRFU seminarUppsala, 7/12/2005

  10. Ultra high-energy neutrinos • UHE neutrinos should be produced in the GZK process:++ +   e+ +e +  +  • More sources of UHE neutrinos suggested, but none confirmed • No magnetic field influence • Detection using optical, radio oracoustic methods • Best limits on UHE neutrino fluxobtained using radio methods Gorham et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (2004) Oscar Stål os@irfu.se IRFU seminarUppsala, 7/12/2005

  11. Outline • Presentation of objectives • Introductory high-energy cosmic particle physics • Radar studies of EAS ionisation columns • Lunar satellite detection of Askar’yan radio pulses • Discussion and outlook Oscar Stål os@irfu.se IRFU seminarUppsala, 7/12/2005

  12. Nishimura-Kamata-Greisen (NKG) model for EAS Longitudinal development parametrised by shower age: “slant depth” Total number of particles in the shower: Transverse distribution of shower particles: Oscar Stål os@irfu.se IRFU seminarUppsala, 7/12/2005

  13. Ionisation columns • Atmospheric ionisation yield calculated from transverse particle density and ionisation parameters for air • Ionisation over long distances, > 10 km • Evaporation timescale uncertain:20 s – 20 ms Oscar Stål os@irfu.se IRFU seminarUppsala, 7/12/2005

  14. Ionisation columns • Ionisation volume modelled as collisionless, cold, non-magnetised plasma with inhomogeneous density Oscar Stål os@irfu.se IRFU seminarUppsala, 7/12/2005

  15. Radar cross section and scattering width • The radar cross section [m2] is the projected area of a perfectly reflecting sphere giving a reflected power equivalent to that of the real target • In a two-dimensional problem, the cross section is replaced by the scattering width [m] Cross section (RCS): Scattering width (SW): Oscar Stål os@irfu.se IRFU seminarUppsala, 7/12/2005

  16. Inhomogeneous wave equations • To determine the radar cross section of the EAS ionisation columns, the scattered E and B fields are required • Wave equations for the spatially inhomogeneous medium derived from first principles (Maxwell): Oscar Stål os@irfu.se IRFU seminarUppsala, 7/12/2005

  17. Separation of the wave equations • For radially inhomogeneous n(x) it is possible to separate the wave equations in cylindrical coordinates • The Ez and Bz component equations decouple for infinite cylinderShower aging is effectively neglected, we treat only maximum • TM and TE mode scattering for normally incident wavem is the azimuthal “quantum number” Oscar Stål os@irfu.se IRFU seminarUppsala, 7/12/2005

  18. Scattering theory in cylindrical geometry The Sommerfeld radiation condition for n = 2 allows the total field to be written as incoming plane wave + scattered cylindrical wave: Asymptotic dependence of scattered wave is chosen consistently with plane wave expansion when there is no scatterer: The phase shifts m contain all information about the scattering: Oscar Stål os@irfu.se IRFU seminarUppsala, 7/12/2005

  19. Phase-integral approximations • How to obtain the phase-shifts? Usually by analytic matching if the inner solution is known. We use the phase-integral (WKB) method The general second order linear ODE of a complex z has approximate phase-integral solutions in terms of where q(z) is generated asymptotically from an arbitrary base-function, for order 2N+1 of approximation: Oscar Stål os@irfu.se IRFU seminarUppsala, 7/12/2005

  20. First order approximations to the phase-shifts • Phase-shifts in phase-integral method obtained from the asymptotics of the solutions • Connection formula used to cross the turning point from q2 < 0 to q2 > 0 • In first order approximation,it is possible to use a pathalong the real line Oscar Stål os@irfu.se IRFU seminarUppsala, 7/12/2005

  21. Choice of base function • The base function needs to be consistent with the physics, and this choice is in general a difficult problem. No generic method exists From direct transformation of the radial equations, we obtain for the TM mode equation By using instead the modified base function we reproduce the zero phase-shifts in the no-scattering limit,which is desirable. Corresponds to the Langer modification in a spherical problem and was previously studied by Berry et al. Oscar Stål os@irfu.se IRFU seminarUppsala, 7/12/2005

  22. Scattering widths – numerical results • Numerical integration of the phase-shift formula using the NKG refractive index for horisontal EAS at maximum development • Calculations of the scattering width for various shower altitudes, radar frequencies and primary particle energy Oscar Stål os@irfu.se IRFU seminarUppsala, 7/12/2005

  23. Longitudinal length scale and 3D cross section • Shower not infinitely long – what is the longitudinal length scale? • Scattering theory is formulated in the extreme far-field? • Consider the first Fresnel zone, the longitudinal dimension is given by inverting the far-field condition: • Affects the range of the radar system, and thereby the sensitivity to UHE particle showers. No simulations performed on this Oscar Stål os@irfu.se IRFU seminarUppsala, 7/12/2005

  24. Outline • Presentation of objectives • Introductory high-energy cosmic particle physics • Radar studies of EAS ionisation columns • Lunar satellite detection of Askar’yan radio pulses • Discussion and outlook Oscar Stål os@irfu.se IRFU seminarUppsala, 7/12/2005

  25. Background • Chandrayaan-1 Moon mission • India's first mission to the Moon • Scheduled for launch in 2007-08 • 100 km polar orbit • ELVIS instrument proposal • HF/VHF radio receiver of LOIS type • Can it be used for detection of UHEcosmic particles? Oscar Stål os@irfu.se IRFU seminarUppsala, 7/12/2005

  26. Detection principles 4. Rays refracted at interface 3. Coherent V-C radio emission 5. Detection by satellite or surface-based aerials 2. First interaction, shower initiated 1. Neutrino enters the Regolith Oscar Stål os@irfu.se IRFU seminarUppsala, 7/12/2005

  27. Radio emissions from particles in dense media • Showers very localised in dense media, rM ~ 10 cm • Wavelengths longer than shower dimensions meansemission becomes coherent • Ouput power scales quadratically with E, dominates optical output at UHE • Radio transparent material required • Ice, very dry rock, permafrost, giantunderground salt domes suggested Oscar Stål os@irfu.se IRFU seminarUppsala, 7/12/2005

  28. Coherent Vavilov-Cerenkov emission • Particle track is not infinite, so the output is smeared around the Cerenkov angle • Coherent radiation for higher frequencies closer to the Cerenkov angle qC • Long wavelengths means the shower radiates as a single particle, hence only the net charge contributes v > c/n cos(qC)=1/(nb) Oscar Stål os@irfu.se IRFU seminarUppsala, 7/12/2005

  29. The Askar`yan effect • Neutral shower gives no emission • The particles in an initially neutral shower will undergo scattering processes as they traverse the material... • ... and acquire a negative charge excess of 20-30% • This process is called the Askar’yan effect Compton scattering: + e-atom   e- Bhaba scattering:e+ e-atom e+ e- Annihilation:e+ e-atom    Oscar Stål os@irfu.se IRFU seminarUppsala, 7/12/2005

  30. Radiation properties • Zas-Halzen-Stanev (ZHS) Monte Carlo based on simulations of showers in dense media confirms the 20-30% charge excess Radio emission at Cerenkov angle well parametrised byn0 specific decoherence frequency, 2.5 GHz for regolithThe angular spread is given by a Gaussian:where the width is frequency dependent, decreasing with n E. Zas, F. Halzen and T. Stanev, Phys. Rev. D 45 (1992) Oscar Stål os@irfu.se IRFU seminarUppsala, 7/12/2005

  31. Radiation properties Oscar Stål os@irfu.se IRFU seminarUppsala, 7/12/2005

  32. Experimental confirmation • Experiment at SLAC using 3.6 tons Si target, GeV photons, total shower energy up to 1019 eV • The ZHS simulation results confirmed to a factor of two, radiation coherent and linearly polarised • D. Saltzberg et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 (2001) • P. W. Gorham et al., Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) Oscar Stål os@irfu.se IRFU seminarUppsala, 7/12/2005

  33. The Moon as an UHE particle detector • Moon opaque to neutrinos with E > 1016 eV • UHE cosmic rays of minor interest • Target (upper 10 m) is regolith: Si grains and tiny rocks • Dielectric properties depends on TiO, FeO contaminants • Radio transparency for n < 1 GHzif 5% contaminants assumed Olhoeft and Strangway, Plan. Sci. Lett. 24 (1975) Oscar Stål os@irfu.se IRFU seminarUppsala, 7/12/2005

  34. Threshold energy • Threshold determined from the ZHS parametrisation andthe minimum detectable signal • Using Chandrayaan-1 and ELVIS parameters: • Altitude h = 100 km Centre freq. n = 100 MHz Bandwidth  = 50 MHz Sensitivity Pmin = -135 dBm/Hz => Threshold neutrino energy becomes 5*1019 eV Oscar Stål os@irfu.se IRFU seminarUppsala, 7/12/2005

  35. Detection aperture • Detection rate is given by the effective aperture (“cross section”), determined through simulations • Sensitivity dependent on: • - Primary neutrino mixing and branching ratios • - Primary energy and neutrino-nucleon cross section - Dielectric properties, attenuation in the regolith • - Surface effects (refraction, reflection etc.) • - Distance from surface to observation point (geometry) • - Measurement frequency, bandwidth and minimum signal • Monte Carlo sensitivity simulation implemented in Matlab • Simulations performed for different primary neutrino energy Oscar Stål os@irfu.se IRFU seminarUppsala, 7/12/2005

  36. Simulation results 2pAmoonNdetected/Ntotal Oscar Stål os@irfu.se IRFU seminarUppsala, 7/12/2005

  37. Model dependent event rate • Using model for minimum GZK neutrino flux (Engel et al., 2001) • The event rate can then be determined from => 2.2 detectable events per year =) Oscar Stål os@irfu.se IRFU seminarUppsala, 7/12/2005

  38. Outline • Presentation of objectives • Introductory high-energy cosmic particle physics • Radar studies of EAS ionisation columns • Lunar satellite detection of Askar’yan radio pulses • Discussion and outlook Oscar Stål os@irfu.se IRFU seminarUppsala, 7/12/2005

  39. Discussion, part 1 • We have presented how an EM scattering problem in cylindrical geometry can be conveniently treated by the phase-integral approximation • The results have been applied to scattering of radio waves from EAS ionisation columns for determination of radar cross sections • The physics of the EAS has been modelled in a simplistic manner, which might put restrictions on the applicability of our results from this aspect • Applications of radio wave scattering in cylindrical geometry also exist for meteor trails, ionospheric striations and for lightning ionisation Oscar Stål os@irfu.se IRFU seminarUppsala, 7/12/2005

  40. Discussion, part 2 • We have considered observation of coherent radio pulses from showers induced in the lunar regolith by UHE cosmic neutrinos • A simple simulation program has been constructed for estimating the efficiency of a satellite experiment with this purpose • This program offers generous possibilities for further variation of different experimental parameters • Porting to a faster code (e.g. FORTRAN) is desirable before more extensive simulations can be performed • We believe that optimisation might further increase the 2.2 events to something really useful, although 2.2 yr-1 is still competitive (!) Oscar Stål os@irfu.se IRFU seminarUppsala, 7/12/2005

  41. THE ENDThank you for listening! Special thanks to everyone who has supported me during this work:Bo Thidé, IRF-UJan Bergman, IRF-UGunnar Ingelman, THEP, UUJohn A. Adam, ODU (Norfolk, VA)Fellow diploma students at IRF-U and elsewhereAll members of the friendly staff at IRF-U Oscar Stål os@irfu.se IRFU seminarUppsala, 7/12/2005

  42. Surface effects • Radio waves refracted at surface • Beam becomes wider  Better opening angle, but lower field strength • Total internal reflection, qTIR = /2 – c • TIR more important at high frequencies • CR detection supressed since all rays are down-going • Smooth surface or detailed topographic map Vacuumn = 1 '  Regolithn ≃ 1.7 Oscar Stål os@irfu.se IRFU seminarUppsala, 7/12/2005

More Related